For or Against the Split?

[Guest stigofthedump]

Or a smaller one say 10 teams 2 home 2 away 36 game season, yes 4 leagues of 10, but that means 2 teams must go hmmmmm think about it the timings perfect livi and the arabs, feed them to the fish.

Alternately the old firm

FTOF

[Guest Rebelwithoutaclue]

On the wrong side of the split again but as long as were in the mix we'll eventually end up with the "rich" boys and a share of their dough. Once we're in the pot will we be so keen to give it up. Stick with the split and have faith!

[Kingsmills]

While the split generates some temporary interest for a game or two for mid table teams such as ourselves, I'd much rather see the back of it.

[Scarlet Pimple]

Against the split.

Leaves end games meaningless and not much to play for.

What we need is more teams --16 sounds good. It's boring playing the same teams over and over.Keep the excitement going to the bitter end .