Sign in to follow this  
tm4tj

Player Of The Year - St Mirren

POTY Voting  

35 members have voted

  1. 1. Which player would you award 5 points ?

    • Mark Ridgers
      0
    • David Raven
    • Carl Tremarco
    • Gary Warren
      0
    • Coll Donaldson
    • Joe Chalmers
      0
    • Liam Polworth
    • Iain Vigurs
    • John Baird
      0
    • Jake Mulraney
      0
    • Connor Bell
    • Riccardo Calder
      0
    • George Oakley
      0
    • Charlie Trafford
      0
  2. 2. Which player would you award 3 points ?

    • Mark Ridgers
      0
    • David Raven
    • Carl Tremarco
    • Gary Warren
      0
    • Coll Donaldson
    • Joe Chalmers
    • Liam Polworth
    • Iain Vigurs
    • John Baird
      0
    • Jake Mulraney
    • Connor Bell
    • Riccardo Calder
      0
    • George Oakley
      0
    • Charlie Trafford
      0
  3. 3. Which player would you award 1 point ?

    • Mark Ridgers
    • David Raven
    • Carl Tremarco
    • Gary Warren
      0
    • Coll Donaldson
    • Joe Chalmers
      0
    • Liam Polworth
    • Iain Vigurs
    • John Baird
      0
    • Jake Mulraney
      0
    • Connor Bell
    • Riccardo Calder
    • George Oakley
      0
    • Charlie Trafford
      0
  4. 4. Referee Performance (John McKendrick)

    • 1 (Terrible)
    • 2 (Poor)
      0
    • 3 (Average)
      0
    • 4 (Good)
      0
    • 5 (Excellent)
      0
  5. 5. I confirm I was present at this game and therefore eligible to vote

    • Yes, I was there.
    • No, I am a numpty, please ban me from all polls !
      0


Recommended Posts

*** VOTING IN THE POLL ABOVE IS FOR PEOPLE WHO WERE AT THE MATCH ONLY ***

If you were at the match, please use the poll above to vote for your top 3 players.
As a bit of fun, we have also added an option to rate the referee ....

Please make sure you vote for 3 separate players.

If you make an error, let us know so we can fix it.

PLEASE ONLY VOTE ABOVE IF YOU WERE AT THE GAME

Anyone caught trying to cheat the system WILL be banned from voting in ALL site polls...this is your only warning.


**NOT at the game ?**

As a result of requests received, we have made a slight change to how these threads work for site users who watched the game on TV or listened to the full game live on the radio .......

You too will now be able to cast your votes, but should do it in the thread below, and NOT in the official poll above. Just list the three players of your choosing and award 5,3, or 1 point(s). You can give the ref a mark if you want too !

These votes will NOT be counted in the official total, as we only count votes from those who where actually at the game, but it IS a way for you to participate in the process .... which many people asked for .... a happy medium we hope !!!!!


 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed the sponsors MOTM was Connor Bell.  He wouldn't have been my choice.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Renegade said:

I noticed the sponsors MOTM was Connor Bell.  He wouldn't have been my choice.

They were probably drinking Bells in the warmth of hospitality.

Mind you, to be fair, I thought Connor did pretty well.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For future polls can we replace the terrible option with John McKendrick? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an additional category we need.  We have had a few that were terrible but McKendrick was something else.  He was no where near as good as terrible.

  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In MLS, I coined the phrase "The Gantar scale" on the photoblog I run because that ref is just so poor (consistently) ... although after the recent playoff round against NY Red Bulls, I temporarily replaced it with the "Penso Index" !!!  

I will change the template before tomorrow .... does this sound about right ....

  1. Excellent
  2. Good
  3. Average
  4. Poor
  5. Terrible
  6. worse than John McKendrick !!!
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This work better ? 

 

2017-11-27_14-32-48.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Second version looks good!  It's good that "average" isn't there.  "Average" doesn't mean you are  half way between good or bad, it is where you are relative to others.  Sadly, the reality is that the average ratings of referees has been somewhere between poor and terrible.  

Edited by DoofersDad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  1. Did your job well
  2. Had a pretty good stab at your job, but room for improvement
  3. Some development required
  4. Report immediately for retraining
  5. Go home mate, this isn't for you
  6. Are you John McKendrick?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Strangely enough, when I was creating the poll and came to the referees name, the only thing that stopped me putting in Coco the Clown was I didn't know how to spell Coco.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking we could put a referee's name for each choice ... but sadly I could not come up with any names for items 1-4 !

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.