Jump to content
FACEBOOK LOGIN ×

Jagman

03: Full Members
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jagman

  1. 22 hours ago, Row S said:

    I agree with Scotty and Ronaldo - too much sniping and bickering for daring to express an opinion on the performance of the team. I wasn't the only one who came away from the game feeling as if we'd lost after the effort of some of the players. We still struggle in defence and we have a few players who just don't do enough to justify a place in the starting line up. Glad we moved off the bottom though, but amazed how we are still in touch having failed to take more than 1 point from so many games.

    The support was great today but can those kids stop acting like casuals and start behaving themselves? There was no need for their antics at half time in the toilets and snack bar area, and certainly lying not along Longman Road towards the railway station after the match. About time they learned to show respect for the police and their own fans or someone is going to take away their sweeties and give them a lesson they won't forget.

    Agree 100%, they are embarrassing the club, there is no place for this "Casual" behaviour in 2017.

    Are they the same bunch that misbehave in Elgin a few weeks back?

    If they are your kids, have a word in their ear and sort them out.

     

    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 1
  2. 5 hours ago, old caley girl said:

    I realise the club are on warpath re the issues last week but totally agree with today. One steward in particular seemed to be permanently in their faces all second half and the kids he was picking on were about 13 or 14 years old. All they were doing was standing singing. The number of stewards round them kept increasing probably due to the the aforementioned stewards behaviour. 

    Just seemed totally unnneccessary. 

    The club are on warpath re the issues last week !

    The point!, the hang along, day trippers, spoil it  for the rest.

    Doubt if the kids today were involved in last weeks activities.

    End of the day there is no place for hooligans in football, the authorities will not tolerate it.

    The people responsible for last weeks carry on, they have been involved in ridiculous behaviour in other places.

    ( Hint! Have the club have been tipped off? make sure your fans behave at ALL VENUES!)

     

     

  3. 4 hours ago, PerfICT said:

    Dougal - Vigurs was a passenger for 95% of his time on the field in the derby. His passing was appalling and when he loses the ball he makes no effort to retrieve it - unforgivable. He made 1 positive contribution when he tracked a run in the second half...so he can do it, just chooses not to. I will continue to single him out until he shows the necessary effort to match our predicament. I don't doubt his talent or his lack of confidence, but right now we need guys willing to run through walls for the cause and Liam Polworth is streets ahead of Vigurs in that department. Richie needs to start showing faith in guys who really want it.

    Vigurs has family in Dingwall.

    Hopefully his mind is not there.

    Worst case, if they think he is that bad, get rid of him in the transfer window.

    Looks like Aberdeen will come sniffing for Tansey, again!

    On the transfer market, is there funds to bring in players? doubt it, therefore looks like getting money for Tansey and any other, could help strengthen the squad.

  4. 2 hours ago, Kingsmills said:

    The cynic in me notes that a full strength Hearts side were fit enough this evening to come from a goal down to beat Aberdeen and effectively confirm Celtic as league champions...

     Sickness on Tuesday?

    Could not make it to Inverness.

    AYE! RIGHT!

    Hoodwinked.

    • Agree 1
    • Disagree 1
  5. 54 minutes ago, DoofersDad said:

    Seemingly he lost a contact lens and couldn't see straight.  He appeared to be indicating to the bench that he needed to come off but they weren't having it.  It was a farcical episode but I think the fault for that must lie with the bench rather than Oxley.  Unless they had a spare lens readily to hand then they should have substituted him.  To have a keeper with blurred vision on the park puts other players at risk as well as the obvious risk of losing a goal because the keeper can't see!  I've no idea whether a referee can insist on a substitution in such circumstances but I'm sure someone will know.

    Of course, if it was all an act by Oxley then he should have been sent off.

     

    Pretty certain the rules are!

    If a player is considered a danger to himself or the opposition, then he can be removed from the field of play.

    Therefore the referee can insist on a players removal.

    Examples are, a player walking on with normal prescription glasses, the referee would ask him to remove them, or leave the field.

    A player smelling of alcohol, (more for amateurs?) if the referee got the impression there was a smell, then he could ask for the player to removed.

    Apart from that not a great night for players, manager.

    But calls for Yogi to be replaced by Foran?

    Foran has no management experience.

     

    • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. : Terms of Use : Guidelines : Privacy Policy