Jump to content

ictchris

03: Full Members
  • Posts

    2,709
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    62

Posts posted by ictchris

  1. 16 minutes ago, CELTIC1CALEY3 said:

    Technically we are not out of administration and whilst Paul has agreed a 12 month extension we do not what constraints the Club is still under for signing players. If anyone is more up to date than me please advise.

    We will agree it and then sign when we are officially out of admin.  It's all been agreed, it's just waiting for it to pass through the legal process.

  2.  

    Quote

     

    It is vital that the joint-administrators can present a clear proposal to creditors. In particular, the purchase of the lease in respect of the land surrounding the stadium, which involves a splitting of the lease, requires a legal agreement involving the club, current leaseholders and Highland Council as head Landlord.

    All parties are fully engaged and the joint-administrators thank Highland Council for their swift and pragmatic approach to this.

    “As a result, and to ensure a proposal is presented to the creditors without unfulfilled conditions, the CVA meeting will now be held on June 5. The relevant documents have been sent to creditors today [Monday 19 May].

    “The joint-administrators would stress that they are confident that a successful outcome is achievable.

     

     

  3. 45 is no age, what a terrible thing.

    I'm sure he was our youngest ever player for a few years.  I remember him making his debut in a derby game, although I might be wrong about that.

  4. We can just build the stadium where the battery farm was going to go, we own that land anyway, or David Cameron does, and all the goodwill we've built up with the people around there and the council we'll sail through the planning process.

    • Funny 6
  5. Reading stuff about building a new stadium really makes me worry about what is going on.  We need a buyer for the club but haven't had a bid, now we are talking about a new ground?  That will cost millions and would put any buyer off.

    I think things are very  bad and liquidation is probably the most likely outcome at this point.

  6. I'll echo what's been said by others about the game.  We played really well for an hour, moved the ball well, looked threatening and were the better team.  A couple of bad errors, losing a ball in themiddle of the pitch for the secondgoal and leaving a man at the back post for the third goal, saw us go down.  It'll be a lesson learned and I think that we'll benefit from having Danny Devine back in the middle.

    Positives are that I thought Longstaff and Bray had good games, particularly in the first half.  It's probably the best I've seen Longstaff play for us.  Both faded when they were switched in the second half though.  In midfield, the structure was good with Allan dropping deep and MacKinnon and Thompson ahead of him.  Think Thompson might have been a bit match rusty.

    The negatives were that we might have had a lot of the play but we didn't score when we were on top, we didn't press home our advantage.  We also didn't force their keeper to do much - he had one save I think in the second half that you thought we might have scored but nothing beyond that.  We really are lacking in attacking over - our only centre forward is Billy Mckay who is getting on.  We don't even have anyone to play up front from the bench.  Chatter before thegame was that Adam Brooks was one of our highest earners, up to £1000/week, so from that viewpoint I get why he was made redundant but it leaves us very thin up top.

    Thought our fans were great, good to see a healthy travelling support who mainly stayed to the end.

    • Like 4
    • Agree 1
    • Well Said 2
  7. We would have been in administration within the 12 months.  We'd have had massively reduced income from supporters and sponsors if the move had gone ahead, the situation would have been unsustainable.

    That little spiel from Ferguson actually makes me think far less of Ross Morrison.  He was prepared to fund the club for twelve months if we moved to Kelty but people didn't want to move to Kelty so no funding?  I don't blame him for not funding the club anymore, it's burning money really, but he would ONLY fund it if we moved football operations 140 miles away?  Seems a bit of a tantrum.

     

    • Like 2
    • Agree 5
    • Well Said 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. : Terms of Use : Guidelines : Privacy Policy