It appears we all missed something yesterday in Perth which could change the outcome of the game! According to this report Richie Foran scored 2 goals, therefore we won 4-3 :P

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/football/cups...86908-21842989/

just read that and how on earth have they fecked that up big time?

i couldnt resist making a comment :004:

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/football/cups...86908-21843321/

The ratings weren't much better. They bear no relation to either the game or the comment associated. If Nauris was so good, how come he gets the least marks? If it all went wrong for Duncan, how come he's up there with most of the rest?

Ryan Esson 6

No chance with any of the goals. Safe pair of hands otherwise.

Ross Tokely 6

Lucky to get away with second-half slip.

Nauris Bulvitis 5

Thundered into challenges from start. Decent distribution from back too.

Grant Munro 6

Skipper led by example but couldn't prevent second-half collapse.

Stuart Golabek 6

Played as though this would be his last final albeit his efforts were in vain.

David Proctor 7

Calm and composed in holding role.

Danni Sanchez 6

Caused Dundee defence all sort of problems. Fast and tricky.

Russell Duncan 6

Fought tooth and nail to gain Inverness a foothold before it all went wrong.

Richie Foran 8

Too much for Dark Blues defence early on. Took both goals expertly well.

Adam Rooney 7

On fire in first half and worked socks off.

Jonny Hayes 7

Got off to a flier and pinpoint crossing caused chaos in opposition penalty box.

Subs:

Lee Cox - did fine for last 20 minutes, 4.

Dougie Imrie - sent off for foul on Clarke, 1.

Eric Odhiambo - failed to conjure up late equaliser, 1.

If you think that's bad you should of seen the rating from Tuesday's Courier. Hayes got six, Sanchez got five, while Duncan got eight!

Edited November 27, 200915 yr by Renegade

If you think that's bad you should of seen the rating from Tuesday's Courier. Hayes got six, Sanchez got five, while Duncan got eight!

No way! Was this only in print or on the website?

I saw it in the paper itself.