Jump to content
FACEBOOK LOGIN ×

Scotty

08: Site Admin
  • Posts

    21,976
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    184

Posts posted by Scotty

  1. 13 minutes ago, old caley girl said:

    Personally I don't think having a Director as SLO is right. I'd prefer it was a fan recruited for the roll given its meant to be the communication bridge between fans and clubs. Exactly like it is at other clubs. 

    Don't care who it is provided they are responsive and handle the contact with supporters quickly and with fairness. 

    Also don't buy the "doesn't get emails" line. It is so simple to set up email aliases, groups and/or forwarders that can deliver or forward email sent to one generic address such as SLO@<domain> to one, two or a hundred other email addresses including personal or internal addresses.  

    • Agree 1
    • Well Said 1
  2. 9 hours ago, lizi said:

    Chairman Rae was an exceptional Chairman - always friendly, spoke to fans and held a few open meetings with fans if I remember correctly.  He replied to my emails, invited me to Boardroom, and to this day acknowledges and chats to fans whenever he’s around.   Our CEO would do well to do the same.  

    not my experience with Mr. Rae.

     

    • Sad 1
  3. Is Keith back? Thought he had moved to Brechin City last September? Although he does seem to have been tweeting about ICT in Apr and June. 

    He was indeed easy to deal with when I last spoke with him. 

     

  4. 27 minutes ago, STFU said:

    There's a significant number of posts on this forum from fans whom have tried to communicate with the club and got zero response.  Are some now suggesting we have to pay to join the trust to have any chance of receiving such a courtesy?

    nope, communication should not be dependent on membership of anything. However, if the trust can reach a tipping point where it has a significant membership, seen to be representative of the support then they really do need to listen if the Trust speaks with a representative voice. Whether they do or not is another question. 

    I would wager that many of those who don't get a response or who are grumbling may be shareholders. I for one would be happy to proxy my miniscule holding to the Trust for any meetings in future. If you have a few hundred more like that then you take the 10% voting share they already have and make it a little more. That just might be noticed. If we do manage to make it back to the premiership then it is also worth considering that our current method of communication - or lack thereof - may not stand up to UEFA club licensing criteria. 

    • Like 1
    • Agree 2
  5. 1 hour ago, big cherly said:

    Do the representatives selected (they are rarely votes in), truly act on the undiluted views of the fans, or is it a filter to present a set of guidelines their masters want them to work within!  

    Having been involved in the committee of the Supporters Club 20 years ago, and probably involved to this day in something other than just the website if I still lived in Inverness, I can say that if enough people came forward to want to be involved, then the supporters club/trust (or whatever name it went under) would typically relish the idea of having actual elections. The reality is you get a handful of people, mostly the same people, stepping up to get involved in these ventures. These are typically folk that do have the interests of supporters at the heart of things and are dedicated ICT fans so also try to do what's in the interests of the club. Over the course of a few years they do get questioned about motives and in some cases cant win - being regarded a certain way by both club and supporters alike. 

    I understand when some of these folks get jaded as you can only bang your head against a brick wall for so long, but they keep doing it because no-one else is coming forward. Would be great to see some representation from all parts of the ground and all age groups. I too have been lax in throwing my fiver in, but perhaps I should. 

    • Like 1
    • Well Said 5
  6. 7 hours ago, Andrew Morrison said:

    It seems idiotic that we have to keep saying this - but we have to stop this out of contract nonsense. We’ve been described as a ‘selling club’ in years gone by which is a fair assessment all things considered, but what good is it if you’re repeatedly holding onto your best assests, allowing then to depart on a free when they have hinted they want out a whole year before the fact…

    6 hours ago, forresjags said:

    2 best players off to Killie and County surprised that they both set the bar so low. Typically we don't get a bean for either of them, criminal how we let our prizes assets slip through our hands year after year.

    We cant force players or their agents to accept our contract offers, nor to negotiate them when they are coming to an end. The days of Jim McLean style contracts have been over for decades. Its a sad reality but given how we also lurch from year to year financially, offering longer term contracts is also not feasible whether we like it or not. Even if we were in a position to offer long term deals, if a player doesn't want to commit to that length of contract there's not a lot we can do about it. 

     

    2 hours ago, STFU said:

    Some people seem to have forgotten we just finished in the bottom half of one of the weakest Championship leagues in a long time!  The fact some are trying to spin it as a successful season shows the current level of our ambition!

    Unfortunately, I agree. As much as it sticks in the throat, players going to County or Killie is currently  an upward step. Higher wages, higher level of competition etc. We cant put that ridiculous situation right until we can get out of this division (in the right direction).

     

      

    • Agree 2
  7. Scotty

    • HT: 1-0
    • FT: 1-1
    • 1st Scorer ICT: Billy Mckay
    • 1st Scorer Celtic: Jota
    • Crowd: 52385
    • ICT anytime scorer: Henderson
    • Time of First Goal: 8
    • Yellow Card: Carson

    CDN Girl

    • HT: 2-0
    • FT: 4-1
    • 1st Scorer ICT: Henderson
    • 1st Scorer Celtic: Furuhashi
    • Crowd: 55880
    • ICT anytime scorer: Billy Mckay
    • Time of First Goal: 4
    • Yellow Card: Deas

    SOS

    • HT: 0-0
    • FT: 1-2
    • 1st Scorer ICT: Doran
    • 1st Scorer Celtic: Jota
    • Crowd: 54881
    • ICT anytime scorer: Billy Mckay
    • Time of First Goal: 51
    • Yellow Card: Allardice

     

    Play JOKER for any of us that have any left. I think we used them up though 😉

  8. I will review in the off-season. Its all about getting enough revenue to keep the site ticking over but not making it too annoying for users. The Vignette ads for some reason perform better than any other type of ads, not sure why. 

    • Thank You 1
  9. Thats likely the prize money but does it include the shared gate receipts for the semis and final? That might be where the numbers look wrong as the number floating around a few weeks ago was well over £1m impact on our income. 

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
    • Thank You 1
  10. Scotty

    • HT: 1-1
    • FT: 3-2
    • 1st Scorer ICT: Mckay
    • 1st Scorer Ayr: Maguire
    • Crowd: 2111

    **JOKER**

    CDN Girl

    • HT: 0-0
    • FT: 1-0
    • 1st Scorer ICT: Shaw
    • 1st Scorer Ayr: Akinyemi
    • Crowd: 2268

    **JOKER**

    SOS

    • HT: 1-0
    • FT: 2-0
    • 1st Scorer ICT: Henderson
    • 1st Scorer Ayr: Mullin
    • Crowd: 2765

    **JOKER**

  11. 58 minutes ago, IMMORTAL HOWDEN ENDER said:

    But perhaps a 17.30 kick off would allow more time for pre-match preparations ?

     

    54 minutes ago, RiG said:

    A late KO scuppers fans who may want to get public transport back north after the match.

     

    Aint gonna happen IMHO ... Police Scotland will quosh that idea citing public order concerns. Gives @IMMORTAL HOWDEN ENDER way too much time for all those Voddies. 

    • Facepalm 1
  12. 2015 FA Cup Final kicked off at 5:30PM ... obviously didnt want to be overshadowed by ICT -V- Falkirk game that kicked off at 3PM the same day. Managed to convert a few TFC & Arsenal fans to ICT that day 🙂

    image.jpeg

     

    The cynic in me says if there is money on the table (or under it) then it will be moved away from 3pm, especially as the FA has confirmed Man Utd -V- Man City as 3PM (assuming the proposed rail strike doesn't kybosh all of that). Logic dictates that they will go for the earlier kickoff for the SFA final as they never want to give fans too much time to get tanked up before the match. Time to set the alarm clocks folks!  

     

  13. On 4/30/2023 at 5:07 AM, TheMantis said:

    Watched it back via the bbc recording and the coverage was just as bad as we had heard with all the blackouts. Also my recording finished at 2pm with a few minutes to go so no interviews etc.

    Somehow my feed was from 'viaplay'. No cutting out, no lag, and no problems. very enjoyable watch with my (early) morning coffee. Saved the drams for later when book ending my day with a Toronto FC win against NYC FC.  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. : Terms of Use : Guidelines : Privacy Policy