Everything posted by cif73
-
Morton -V- Inverness CT
Agree with all the comments above. Well done for an excellent team display. They certainly did their part convincingly today and it could have easily been a bigger score. Also a massive shout out to our fans today especially the singing section who sang and drummed enthusiastically throughout and afterwards ... long after it was known how the Dunfermline game was progressing. We've a great range of songs now ... it's moved on a bit from the "give me a c" days.
- Livingston -V- Inverness CT
- Livingston -V- Inverness CT
- Inverness CT -V- Dunfermline
- Inverness CT -V- Dunfermline
-
Inverness CT -V- Dunfermline
OK, now looking back at highlights that's probably a fair point. The incident that led to Dunfermline's free kick is strangely not on CaleyJags TV highlights but it is on the Pars TV extended highlights. Stupid (possibly tired) challenge from Tremarco that gave the ref a decision to make.
-
Announcement
... Only a lighter note CaleyD, are you thinking about changing your profile from "Erse Licking Happy Clapper"?
- Inverness CT -V- Dunfermline
- Inverness CT -V- Dunfermline
- Inverness CT -V- Dunfermline
-
Inverness CT -V- Dunfermline
Sick and tired of referees directly affecting football results. Soft free kick led to equaliser. Dunfermline is another street-wise central belt team that: 1. foul and get away with it and 2. fall to get the free kick. Just feel like there is almost systemic bias against us sometimes.
- Inverness CT -V- Dunfermline
- Inverness CT -V- Dunfermline
- Inverness CT -V- Dunfermline
- Dumbarton -V- Inverness CT
- Dumbarton -V- Inverness CT
- Inverness CT -V- Falkirk
- Inverness CT -V- Falkirk
-
Special General Meeting
The Companies Act only applies to limited companies. Unless Caley Jags Together is a limited company, then the rules codified in the Companies Act don't apply. If it is a society, it should be governed by its society rules and society legislation. At least the people involved seem to be trying to take things forward now. After all this period of apparent inactivity, if we're going to be pompous/critical about their strict adherence to rules, then let's at least know ourselves which set of rules are to be followed.
-
Inverness CT -V- Brechin City
He was unusually cautious going forward. Defensively ok though obviously not really tested. Numerous times i was shouting for him to make a run down the flank ... as he has done in the past. This was the night to do it but seemed a bit lacking in confidence, almost as though he was calling for the ball but not really wanting it. That said, unlucky not to score at the back post from a tight angle a bit Ravenesque in Scottish Cup semi.
-
Inverness CT Loyal Army
Fair enough ... asking him/her if he/she was 8 was what got me blocked I think
-
Inverness CT Loyal Army
This was the post inviting comment ... "If I was a Inverness Thistle fan then I definitely wouldn't be a Caley Thistle fan or "Caley" as they are always called."
-
Inverness CT Loyal Army
Yes. Thankfully, at least regarding the original admin post, common sense seems to have finally prevailed and it has come off FB. In a comment to that post, I expressed surprise and disappointment that it went on FB so, as you say Cableguy, my comment was deleted by admin. I put it on again and asked how old admin was. I promptly got blocked thereby preventing me from following a page which often has decent content. All in all a pretty disappointing episode.
-
Inverness CT Loyal Army
Anyone know who runs the admin for this Facebook page?
-
Inverness CT -V- St Mirren
Looking back at the ref's performance, i just cannot fathom: 1. The 2nd St Mirren penalty award 2. The free kick award that led to St Mirren's 2nd goal 3. Our lack of penalty award (especially Doran's claim ... and especially with their previous soft one ... sometimes ref's will "even it up") Completely mystifying ... and sadly nowhere near the first time this season that we've had genuinely serious complaints at home.