I think the TV said:

Esson

Tokely Munro Proctor Hastings

Cowie Duncan Black Vigurs McBain

Barrowman

Cowie playing off Barrowman.

So the inevitable questions: if we must change strikers, why Barrowman rather than Rooney? Why Proctor in the middle again after last week rather than Duff? Imrie dropped rather than McBain? Have we finally found the winning formula?...

I think the TV said:

Esson

Tokely Munro Proctor Hastings

Cowie Duncan Black Vigurs McBain

Barrowman

Cowie playing off Barrowman.

So the inevitable questions: if we must change strikers, why Barrowman rather than Rooney? Why Proctor in the middle again after last week rather than Duff? Imrie dropped rather than McBain? Have we finally found the winning formula?...

iam convinced if brewster wants to make a change he as has been said picks a name out a hat :thumb04: rooneys done more than barrowboy eve rhas,why change if leaving rooney out would of been better sticking with wood

Just cracked open another bottle of voddie.

How can he play Barrowman up front after the way he has cossetted Wood and Rooney.

Proctor was clearly to blame for not attacking crosses last week and is not a central defender - bet Botyd is licking his feckin lips. - what the feck ?

Royster gets the old school nod again - Imrie is better when Vigurs is there.

Although I agree with it why does he all of a sudden take back Vigurs when the lad should have been on from the start last week.

The defence is there for the taking !!

It now all depends on Cowie and Black !!