-
Posts
2,259 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
21
Content Type
Profiles
Articles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Store
Events
Everything posted by MrCaleyjag
-
Me: Kelty @ 4.00 Caleyjag: Elgin @ 1.66
-
-
NAPs Competition Points Update - Week 32 - 2024/25
MrCaleyjag replied to MrCaleyjag's topic in Betting Forum
It was totally my fault, I didn't read your prediction clearly enough and scored it as a Jeanfield win over 90mins, sorry for that - I've updated the points above. The cup round being included was a one-off so won't need to worry about it again. -
NAPs Competition Points Update - Week 32 - 2024/25
MrCaleyjag replied to MrCaleyjag's topic in Betting Forum
Week 11 Mrs Gringo: 306.60 Jodie Carnie: 255.50 SOS: 252.200 Scotty: 242.30 TheCaleyOne: 232.00 MrCaleyjag: 200.20 Caley Canary: 199.50 Robert: 186.90 Caleyjag: 184.50 The Mantis: 180.50 CDN Girl: 177.30 Noho: 158.30 Gringo: 135.00 5/13 correct -
Me HT: 0v0 FT: 2v1 1st ICT: B Mckay 1st Opp: Pignatiello Crowd: 597 Caleyjag HT: 0v0 FT: 1v1 1st ICT: D Devine 1st Opp: M Shiels Crowd: 666
-
NAPs 2024/25 - Week 11 - Saturday 26th October
MrCaleyjag replied to MrCaleyjag's topic in Betting Forum
Looks like it's been updated Threave draw is 9.50, hope it doesn't come up as I never noticed it when I posted -
NAPs 2024/25 - Week 11 - Saturday 26th October
MrCaleyjag replied to MrCaleyjag's topic in Betting Forum
Me - Musselburgh Ath @ 3.50 Caleyjag - Livingston @ 1.75 -
My first initial thought was that it would be some kind of quick service/fast food style franchise that would work hand-in-hand with the stadium opening hours/business model that way appealing more to the type of service that would be easily achievable on a fast basis such as matchday. People don't want to be sitting about for food as such. If it is a sit-down fuss then I think I agree with your assessment above.
-
Ferguson gone, who is next (List of Admin cuts)
MrCaleyjag replied to tm4tj's topic in Caley Thistle
This Thank you to DF, GB and SG for their hard work and time put in at the club and wish them the best in the future. I'm sure they'll find equal if not better employment elsewhere within the football world. I'm not best placed at present to offer any further opinions especially on DF as it would be ill-placed and I've said a lot already. It's the hard workers behind the scenes that will find it harder and tougher in the coming days, weeks and months and are so often overlooked in these situations. It doesn't pay for the new outlets to focus on the unsung behind the scenes staff which is why they'll all gush about DF. -
I can't find odds for our game this weekend, on either McBookie, Betfair or Bet365, where I normally get odds from. No doubt due to us falling into administration. On top of that, as it's a Scottish Cup weekend the fixtures are reduced so I have taken the decision to break from the norm and include these ones. This is a one off, hopefully no one minds. Championship League 1 Scottish FA Cup
-
NAPs Competition Points Update - Week 32 - 2024/25
MrCaleyjag replied to MrCaleyjag's topic in Betting Forum
Week 10 Mrs Gringo: 282.60 Scotty: 252.30 Jodie Carnie: 247.50 SOS: 242.200 Caley Canary: 209.50 TheCaleyOne: 202.00 Robert: 196.90 The Mantis: 190.50 CDN Girl: 187.30 Caleyjag: 176.90 MrCaleyjag: 175.20 Noho: 168.30 Gringo: 145.00 2/13 correct -
NAPs Competition Points Update - Week 32 - 2024/25
MrCaleyjag replied to MrCaleyjag's topic in Betting Forum
Week 9 Mrs Gringo: 292.60 Jodie Carnie: 257.50 SOS: 252.200 Scotty: 245.70 Caley Canary: 219.50 Robert: 206.90 The Mantis: 200.50 CDN Girl: 197.30 TheCaleyOne: 191.50 Caleyjag: 186.90 MrCaleyjag: 185.20 Noho: 178.30 Gringo: 155.00 4/13 correct -
Me HT: 0v0 FT: 2v1 1st ICT: B Mckay 1st Opp: Maxwell Crowd: 1507 Caleyjag HT: 0v0 FT: 1v1 1st ICT: B Mckay 1st Opp: Green Crowd: 1333
-
NAPs 2024/25 - Week 10- Fri 18th / Sat 19th Oct
MrCaleyjag replied to Gringo's topic in Betting Forum
Me: Ayr @ 2.15 Caleyjag: Ayr @ 2.15 -
Sadly, the first employees to get let go are the hard workers behind the scenes who run the football club from day to day. The ones that everyone forgets about that need their jobs the most. Now I'm not saying that players, managers and coaches don't need their jobs, of course they do, but they have agents who can help them find further employment. They are almost always on the higher end of the payscale at the club and are somewhat protected by league rules and the Scottish PFA so are harder to oust. It must be an administrators nightmare knowing there's obvious outlays to reduce costs but the only way they can be freed is by moving them on or coming to a mutual agreement. Players and managers won't leave unless they have other employment elsewhere. Not as easy as making the receptionist redundant for instance. I suppose the biggest issue for a club our size is, where do those obvious cost cuttings come from as I can't imagine we have an abundance of staff behind the scenes. I hardly see DF as the type of person who'll step up and take strips home to wash or hoover the reception carpet when there's nearly no staff left and jobs to do.
-
Totally agree and whatever personnel/players we do retain or have at our disposal, must be fully committed to starting almost from scratch and looking forward. On the pitch it starts with the manager and for me DF needs to go. We need someone who is forward thinking, someone who'll set out with an attractive forward thinking style of play, be open to progressing both personally and progressing players with a 2 season minimum plan in place. Whether we can avoid relegation or not, we need someone who portrays a belief that we can, not someone who outwardly states we can't simply just to save his own skin by being able to say at the end of the season 'well I told you so meaning I haven't failed' - he's already trying to save his own credibility, whether he has any left or not. If we survive administration in any form, it needs to be treated as a complete reset, a new starting point with measuring points 1, 2, 3, 5yrs down the line. A playing team, coaching staff included, that has no negativity what so ever. It should be about fighting for everything that's left this season and building foundations for being in League 1 with a League 2 budget. If we go down then so be it, we're already working to that budget. If we stay up, it's a bonus. Anything right now is a bonus but sadly DF is not.
-
Daily Mail - other than the Daily Sport is the lowest form of tabloid journalism going, on par with The Sun - not worthy of my time Scott Gardiner - lowest form of upper level management personnel in the market, serial liar, incompetent to the core, vicious, vendictictive and rotten through and through - not worthy of my time Put together - I wouldn't even read this is if it were on a roll of loo roll and I needed to whittle away the time in the toilet due to a bad bout of constipation.
-
Me HT: 2v0 FT: 5v0 Caleyjag HT: 0v0 FT: 3v0
-
That wasn't my point, I'm not doubting the above regards an accountant role. I'm asking if you know for a fact the club accountant didn't challenge the CEO? If you don't know that for a fact or only accept they may have, then you can't throw accusations around like your last statement. Blame the board and the CEO.
-
I'm presuming you know that this is fact and that they were as culpable? I'm also presuming you know as a fact that said person didn't challenge the CEO or others? If you do know that for a fact then I agree with your last statement. However, hearing the way that the CEO ran the club along with the complete lack of transparency of anything from within the club plus the cloak and dagger approach of the inner workings of the club, under the past CEO, is it not a more tangible thought that the club accountant was overruled, not listened to and told what to do? Or simply, those above the club accountant or similar position kept burying their heads in the sand. Maybe we shouldn't hang so many people so easily unless we know the facts. I know people want answers and the likelihood is they won't come but the blame falls firmly at the feet of the board members at the time and the CEO.
-
Why is there even a question over whether certain people (fans) have donated or whether the Supporters Trust have donated even being asked? Whether in jest or not, this is not the time to be singling out individuals and diverting attention from the actual cause and from those who are the only ones who the attention should be on and being questioned and that's the BOARD! Personally, I haven't donated for varying reasons but that doesn't mean I'm wrong in not doing so. Every ounce of anger and questioning and feeling of doubt and ill-feeling should be fully thrown at the board (members past and present) for allowing the situation to get this bad. Every single one of us, every single fan, has something to lose in some aspect whether it be financial or otherwise. The Supporters Trust, like every other shareholder, has something to lose so if you're going to question the Trust over funds or allocation of funds, where's your questions publically of every other shareholder that has a vested interested in the club? Or is it merely that the Supporters Trust is an easy target as at present, other that the board and AS, they are the most visible and therefore an easy target?! Be angry at the right people. Question the right people. The people who have caused this don't want that to happen, they want your anger deflected elsewhere.
-
Me HT: 0v0 FT: 2v1 1st ICT: B Mckay 1st Opp: I Murray Crowd: 1098 Caleyjag HT: 0v0 FT: 1v0 1st ICT: Brooks 1st Opp: R Dow Crowd: 999
-
Apologies also for posting fraction odds and not decimals
-
Me: Falkirk v Ayr draw @ 12/5 Caleyjag: East Fife @ 8/13
-