Simply not true: wing backs tend to have a defensive midfielder to back-fill for them when the attack gets turned over and the opposition hit on the break. With the purely attacking-holding midfield we play just now you're bound to get caught out now and then. Do you really believe Ross would be doing what he's doing and still getting a start if the manager had told him not to? If you see gaps in defence, you need to target your criticism a bit higher up the food chain, and take a pop at Brew for being too attack-minded... On ye go :016:
I've highlighted the important part of my post there. Take Hastings in that game as a prime example. After tearing Gretna's defence a new ersehole, and narrowly missing a goal. He got back in time enough, to be able to pick up who he was marking and be ready for the goal kick to be taken. The same cannot be said for Tokely. He was found out against Aberdeen and he'll be found out in games in the future. Now is the time to drop him to the bench (Note I am not calling for his head) and used as a super sub for Cowie, or used as a centre back.
As for Brew, it looks like I'm one of the those people who will have to accept I may have been wrong to criticise his appointment and I have no intention of having a pop at him for encouraging attacking football. It's just a pity he's not spotted this weak point in our team.
And I've highlighted the important part of my post there: if Brew's happy to see that gap without a McBain dropping back to fill it, then so be it. He must know fine that Ross isn't going to get back in time, but he lets him carry on and still plays one holder and three attackers in midfield. Or perhaps Brew just has the ludicrous expectation that attacks might end in a goal, a corner, a goal kick or a throw, instead of us throwing everyone upfield and then losing the ball through sloppy passing - because that's what we're really talking about here. Either way, don't blame Ross.