ICTFCkev

What about if you already had this other job before you signed a contract for him, and he as part of you signing his contract, there was a clause on it allowing some time off to do this job you had previously, so long as you had someone, I dunno, an assistant maybe? Who could step in for you while you were away? Some people need to get a feckin grip.

Dont kid yourself. Kids have soo much to do these days they dont know where to start. They would rather mump and moan about having nothing to do. Ad love these kids to sample a little of my life growing up in the 70s, make em appreciate exactly what they do have! If you have money theres plenty to do , not so much if your skint . Couldn't agree more.

Slowly creeping up that list Renegade..

If any of my mates are chucked out for singing or standing, and are not being abusive or out of order, then yes I would walk out aswell. But up until something does happen then I will continue to support the team. Bit daft calling for a boycott for this game, when nothings even been done to the fans really... Yet.

Doesn't matter where your ST is lad, it's not a league game.

What sort of behaviour is "descently" behviour? Is the behavour of the majority going down ? Sorry. Spelling not my strong point. Decent = behavoiur of most ICT fans. Descent = what behavoiur in Section G seems to be doing. :D What's behavoiur?

Don't blame the stewards as they are only doing what they are told by their bosses in the background, and most of them are okay about things which they do realise are pretty daft, the odd few however will be complete erse holes about it. It's whichever f*dd in the background is telling them to inflict these daft rules. It's all very well for them sitting back and saying 'Aye do this, do that' but had it been a different group of people rather than a relatively small group of young lads they are trying to intimidate, the stewards could be in for a lot more stick than they are because of them. No one at the back of Section G is trying to be racist or foul and abusive or whatever, and if they were I'm sure the lads that are up there on matchdays would be some of the first to tell them where to go if they were. This is out of order though, threatening Police action if anyone mentions the word, or is standing next weekend. Bang out of order.

Who's all going then? I'll be there in Section Gypsy + a fair few. :)

6 foot according to Wiki.. Maybe DornochJAGGIE or someone could edit it so we're defnitely right..

This genuinely could be the final straw in me supporting the team. Had it to the back teeth with that jobsworth f*dd Mike Smith, and this 'situation' has gone beyond a joke. They are slowly but surely killing off what little atmosphere is at this club. We'll see what happens on Sunday.. Would be handy if the Trust, or even Smithy for that matter (not likely though), could put out a statment so we know where we stand. I don't even know if I'm looking forward to this game anymore.

:lol: Excellent.

I kinda think that section G is to be targeted no matter what the other parts of the grounds sing/shout. Kinda get that impression aswell, but f*ck it, why should we back down to the PC Brigade? Anyone saying the lads in Section G are targetting and racially abusing the C*unty fans really need to get a grip. It's merely football banter, and should be IMHO, part and parcel of the game and rivalry between the teams. Roll on Sunday.

When some of the lads said they wanted a meeting after the game, they were told to stay where they were then, and they would be taken to Smiffy's office post match. They did so, and when they were taken up someone else turned up and told them they wouldn't be able to talk to him, but to leave contact details and they'd arrange a meeting through the week. Dunno if anything more came of it though..? Game against the Gypos this Sunday could be very interesting.. :)

:029: It's by the Beach Boys chief. :022: Never even realised that, a couple of voddys before posting that last night is defo getting the blame :019:

Really doubt it.. What source? Brew had to go a 7 game unbeaten run before the BoD decided enough was enough.

Yes. Oh really, Cox is a RB... Thats what we all thought he was here for..... No one mentioned Cox playing RB.. Starchump mentioned Stratford playing there against C*unty, that would be a disaster I think..

Very much doubt it. Brewster should of been gone long before he was. Many would probably argue he shouldn't have been able to return in the first place. We may still be in the top flight had this been carried through, suppose we'll never know though. I don't see any problem with them appointing Butcher, it was clearly between him and Robbo. Maybe Robbo never got it because of issues between himself and the board/shareholders, whatever, I don't know much of the background details to be honest, but some people out there do, and fair play if they don't post it on here, that's entirely up to them. I think Terry and June will be gone at the end of this season though after seeing out their contracts. that would/will never happen. Clearly.. With the benefit of hindsight we can now say it wasn't the right decision. I think it was a choice between Butcher and Robbo. THe board had already made a huge boob appointing a manager who had previously been at the club, and it failed miserably, should they have done it again and Robbo wasn't successful, then they would have got pelters for making the same mistake twice, and people would be saying we should have appointed Robbo? Or is what I have just stated above a convenient excuse to hide a not-so-secret personal fall out? :024:

Very much doubt it. Brewster should of been gone long before he was. Many would probably argue he shouldn't have been able to return in the first place. We may still be in the top flight had this been carried through, suppose we'll never know though. I don't see any problem with them appointing Butcher, it was clearly between him and Robbo. Maybe Robbo never got it because of issues between himself and the board/shareholders, whatever, I don't know much of the background details to be honest, but some people out there do, and fair play if they don't post it on here, that's entirely up to them. I think Terry and June will be gone at the end of this season though after seeing out their contracts.

Yes.

What would be your back four then if no Bulvitis and Proctor, plus without Tokely, Duff and possibly Golabek? Djebi-Zadi partnering Munro in the heart of defence with Shinnie and, who, McBain or Stratford as full-backs? Is that an improvement? To be fair, I don't think Georgie realised all that or took it into account before he posted. It is inevitable that Proctor and Bulvitis will start this game IMO.

And that would be the team that's currently bottom of the league, and proved more than a match for us last weekend. Infact had the result been a fair reflection of the performances, we would be the only team in the league with no wins at home.

Or just not wanting to get his account suspended for a week or two?

The midfield also needs an anchorman playing in behind them and I believe Duncan would be most suitable for this position. Put question marks beside Golly aswell.. Anyone know why he wasn't included today? Is he injured or what?

Yeah I've noticed that over the last couple of days aswell :) Thought it must of been the injury table or something.

I definitely wouldn't have Balvitis in mine either. :) I don't know would I go with Rooney upfront or Barrowman. Barrowman should know what this derby is all about and won't need much more motivation than to get one over on his old team. Sanchez defo benched. He didn't seem to have a clue where he was last time we played C*unty. Never know though, coming on from the bench, he may be able to make the difference should it be required.