Renegade

Woman have every right to play football No they don't. Football is a man's game, like chopping wood and building sheds. Women's place is in the home, cooking, cleaning and so on.

I'm not so sure, I think folk were a bit quick to knock off poor wee Ossie. His style could've been beneficial to ICT, especially when t come to keeping the ball on the deck. What kind of style does Ossie play anyone know? I was only 3 years old when he was in england at Spurs Apparently his big on the diamond shaped/polo formation, which I think is roughly 1-6-3, with most of the players on the wings. He went with 5 up front for Spurs a few times as well.

so do/did you class stuart garden a good goalkeeper?? i certainly dont Don't know, I don't think I ever saw him play.

I take it that it was Ricky Villa then. I'm not so sure, I think folk were a bit quick to knock off poor wee Ossie. His style could've been beneficial to ICT, especially when t come to keeping the ball on the deck.

Maybe for a goalie coach it would be good to have someone who was at least decent at goalkeeping.

Celtic are in Europe every season . Yes cause they play in a mediocre league, which is what they play in week in week out with the odd European game here and there, which usually ends rather quickly.

It seems one poster loves Brewster so much, he's replied to the thread 55 times! Just as well to me as his posts say the same thing:

I think I speak for most if not all ICT supporters when I say that next season, these rubbish long ball tactics have to thrown into the Caley Stadium skip. These tactics were the downfall of Brewster, and seemed to be Butcher's tactics as well last Saturday when Tokely got sent off. It was mentioned on here as well a couple of days ago that these could well be Butcher's tactics for next season as well, and if that's true then promotion will be near impossible. ICT's tactics at home at least should always be keeping the ball on the deck the vast majority of the time, using the width of the midfield to play the ball to the wings. ICT are not now, and have never been a team that benefits from mindless hoofs forward. In fact I would put that as one of the reasons for relegation, with Munro's punts constantly puting the opposition in possession. What does everyone else think of the long ball? Should ICT continue with it, or punt it, so to speak? Discuss.

I think it's sickening that these games are even taking place. A women's place is not out on the open space of a football field. It's a man's game. Women's place in the home, cooking, cleaning and doing other household chores. Everyone knows that. :015:

What do you mean how did I rate their support? In what way? Did they contribute to his downfall there? The way I look on it is, Dundee United should have sacked him IF he got them relegated. He didn't therefore imo he should have stayed. Their fans acted the same way ours did and were wrong at the time. (again imo) :015: I take it under that logic then that if your house is on fire and it's clearly going to burn to the ground, you should stay put just in case it doesn't. Even though it's clear what's going to happen. And how anyone could say that Brew was a good manager is just laughable. Brew's loyal army of two on here must of got sexual pleasure from the long balls, and amazing excitement of seeing David Proctor playing centre-half. I know I did.

Is that not Tony Bullock's lot Montrose?

I think Jim Hamilton is an on/off poster on here at times. I think his username is "Richard Fairbrass" or something.

Oh yeah suppose it would

The same way you read it on the back, with the help of decent sized letters.

I'd rather be in the English Premiership and try to make something of it than be in a diddy league week in week out, with an occaisonal struggle in Europe.

Whats the point in putting names on the shorts? We have bigger fish to fry. So you can tell who's who's if you don't know. Whats the point in putting names on the shorts? We have bigger fish to fry. Ignore him and he might go away , hopefully :P

No, in the first division you CAN have names but there's no point because it's gotta be 1-11. Players could just put there names on their shorts and have only number on their shirts. As far as I know there is no rule against having names on the shorts.

So what? Doesn't meaning anything now, with Scottish football gradually getting worse and the English Premiership being one of, if the best comeptition in football, he'd be a fool to leave Burnley just now.

The way Denzil's been playing for the last few years, he needs all the help he can get!

http://sport.scotsman.com/sport/Morais-wei...ions.5309645.jp Sounds like Morais is away.

Hardly mediocre !! Remind me , who were the first Brittish team to win the European Cup ? Who cares if they were the first British team to win the European Cup, that was years ago.

Oh Jesus, if I have to watch any more of that punting nonsense at the the Tulloch Fun House, I'm going to get very angry.

I could live with Juanjo back actually. Apparently he aint as good as he used to be but he'd still probably be quite good.

Could they put names on the shorts?

Since it's SFL next season, will ICT go back to numbering everyone 1-11 in every game, or will they stick with an individual number for each player? I know most if not all SFL teams I've ever seen seem to go with 1-11, with nameless shirts. Will ICT be doing that next season? And here's the other thing, is this nameless shirts wih 1-11 an SFL rule or do the clubs do it voluntarily, if they wish to stick with the individual numbers?