Renegade

Odhiambo doo doo doo doo Odhiambo doo doo doo doo

There is a guy in Auckland on here at times, can't remember his name though. That's lower than Canberra I think.

-----------------------------------------Esson---------------------------------------------- --------Tokely----------Mihadjuks-----------------------Duff------------Djebi-Zadi----- ---------------------------McBain-------------------------Black---------------------------- --------Morais----------Odhiambo-----------------------Foran-------------Imrie--------- Subs: Fraser, Munro, Proctor, Rooney, Wood/Kerr, Hastings, Vigurs 4-2-4 formation (works great on my Football Manager demo) with Tokely and Djebi-Zadi moving forward in attack as wingbacks. Mihadjuks at centre-back and I'd like to see Duff move into the back four replacing Munro as I'd like to see what this back four would look like (probably the tallest ever at ICT). McBain and Black in thr midfield as the playmakers with Odhiambo and Foran up-front with Morais and Imrie on either wing but can move back into the midfield to create a 4-4-2, with Foran and Imrie being interchangable.

and what's that got to do with anything?

Falkirk beaten!

Richie Foran scores!

so who's joking you Renegade? You are

You seriously are joking yeah?

I wouldn't say that this forum was boring in the slightest. If it were it wouldn't have had over 160,000 posts in it. One thing I do find though, which is not dull, though rather boring are these bizarre posters who come on either to fight or to make a pig of themselves. Their username often displays a players name who they usually have an unhealthy obsession over and won't hear a bad word said about. They often display their views as being FACT or that any contrary view is just plain wrong. They often see themselves in a somewhat good vs evil contest. They also come out with somewhat bizarre rants at times either through out and out nastyness and at other times, when an issue is mainly agreed and they are of a contrary point, they lable the whole forum as "dull" or "boring". I for find them both boring and somewhat sad. We all know who I'm talking about here an can someone please put them out of their misery.

I think Mart Poom was linked to ICT at one point. About the time Brown went to Celtic IIRC.

Apparently she was about the time the baby was conceived she was in relations with eight guys. Don't know how she managed itas she sure is ugly. The double of Shannon Mathews actually.

Remember Black, Duncan, Morais and Barrowman are out: ----------------------------------Esson------------------------------------- ------------------Mihadjuks--------------------Munro------------------------ ---Tokely--------------------------------------------------Djebi-Zadi-------- --------------------Kerr------------------------Vigurs----------------------- ----------------------------------Imrie-------------------------------------- -------------Rooney------------Odhiambo------------Foran------------------ Subs - Fraser, Duff, Hastings, Byrne, Proctor, McBain, Wood

Not too bad a result.

Alright fair enough.

Nowt to do with it actually. I was actually going to post something earlier along with the McGuire one. The guy's a liability. I can pass better than him.

Do you believe Duncan is worth keeping at ICT? I don't rate him myself.

Duncan off. He's useless anyway.

Controlled perhaps. That diagrams the best I could find unfortunately. I wouldn't say myself that I believe every little thing that shows that 9/11 was not an inside job as I do have unanswered questions myself, but I can't see it being an inside job myself.

I had a gander for the passport thing and the best I could find was this: Crash-Proof Passport Hijacker's Passport and a Landing Gear Fragment Alone Survive Fiery Crash This illustration from Chapter 1 of FEMA's report shows what few pieces of aircraft debris passed entirely through the Towers. A charred fragment of landing gear on the intersection of West and Rector streets was the only piece they traced to Flight 11. According to ABC News and the Associated Press, the passport of hijacker Satam Al Suqami was found a few blocks from the WTC. 1 2 The Guardian was skeptical: "the idea that Atta's passport had escaped from that inferno unsinged [tests] the credulity of the staunchest supporter of the FBI's crackdown on terrorism." 3 Note the passport did not belong to Atta, as is commonly claimed. Satam Al Suqami was supposedly on Flight 11, the plane that hit the North Tower. In that collision, the building's core absorbed almost the entire airplane, which hit the northeast wall nearly dead center. I'll just ignore the contolly bit.

http://www.representativepress.org/BowingD...xplosives2.html Building that are controlly demolished don't buckle. It's often interesting that conspiracy theorists, will never give up no matter what evidence you throw at them.

The key word is melt. The only people who say that the beams melted are the conspiracy folks. They were really just weakened, thus the building collapsed.

No McGuire in the line-up again. Good.

"Melted" Steel CLAIM: "We have been lied to," announces the Web site AttackOnAmerica.net. "The first lie was that the load of fuel from the aircraft was the cause of structural failure. No kerosene fire can burn hot enough to melt steel." The posting is entitled "Proof Of Controlled Demolition At The WTC." FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800? to 1500?F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750?F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength--and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks." "Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100?F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800? it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat. But jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, notes Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California, San Diego, and one of seven structural engineers and fire experts that PM consulted. He says that while the jet fuel was the catalyst for the WTC fires, the resulting inferno was intensified by the combustible material inside the buildings, including rugs, curtains, furniture and paper. NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832?F. "The jet fuel was the ignition source," Williams tells PM. "It burned for maybe 10 minutes, and [the towers] were still standing in 10 minutes. It was the rest of the stuff burning afterward that was responsible for the heat transfer that eventually brought them down." Simple logic really.

Goallo Goallo