Jump to content

DALNEIGHCALEY

03: Full Members
  • Posts

    3,647
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

Everything posted by DALNEIGHCALEY

  1. Nail on head . Agree entirely .
  2. Really hope the Duncan Ferguson rumour is false .
  3. The post was from a Partick Thistle fan
  4. That's absolutely awful , hope the poor wee mite manages to lead as normal a life as possible . The comments on the website blaming the parents are all you'd come to expect from Sun readers , scum .
  5. Stirling v Airdrie draw @ 3.60
  6. HT: 0 - 0 FT: 1 - 1 1st ICT: Hayes 1st Opp: McLean Crowd:3879
  7. Come on Huisdean this is caleythistleonline , half these posters dont have a clue !
  8. Are you seriously trying to blame Ryan Esson for our lack of clean sheets this season ?
  9. BBC are showing Dundee v kilmarnock As was posted previously by Alex MacLeod
  10. He was only 42 , such a shame . R.I.P.
  11. I know that young Rob, it's just that the article in the P&J completely vindicates the bar and licencee of any wrongdoing and explains all. cheers If that was the case then why does he have to turn the jukebox of at 22:30 when the pubs open til 01:00 ?
  12. HT: 1 - 0 FT: 2 - 1 1st ICT: Tokely 1st Opp: Stevenson Crowd:12676
  13. Livi - County draw @ 3.60
  14. We've become more paranoid than them and our manager is a bigger whinger than Lennon .
  15. He's a Ross County fan!!!111!! :irritated: :irritated: :irritated: Are you really that stupid ? He was talking about a " big team " .
  16. Simple explanation - he's ICT through and through (almost) but when ICT are playing your 'big' team, something has to give....... If only you knew the truth
  17. So who do you think the player is that Butcher was referring to ?
  18. I beg you to stop DC please, my sides are splitting with laughter Only repeating what the manager said at the time .
  19. Butcher even described it as an assault on Samaras .
  20. You really need to look up what constitutes violent conduct. Why was he red carded then ?
  21. He doesn't look to see where the ball is and leads with his arm . DC what are you on about ? this is your gawd knows how manyeth post justifying the sending off, and you are still wrong. Of course you are going to look and see where your opponent is before you jump to challenge him for a header - there's no point in challenging otherwise. You can even check again if you have time. If you can see where the ball has been passed from (or in this case lumped up the park from) as a professional you should be able to judge the flight of it, and where you/ opponent and ball intersect. Tansey did. As for your "interpretation" of the laws of the game, they are just that - laws. There is no interpretation. Law 12 (fouls & misconduct) lays them out perfectly well. The referee can only send Tansey off for either "serious foul play" or "violent conduct" There is no such offence as "leading with the arm" I can see no evidence of either of these offences in the highlights. He could only caution Tansey for "unsporting behaviour" which again there is no evidence of. He could have awarded a direct free kick for any number of described offences, including "jumps at an opponent" in a manner that the referee considers "careless, reckless or using excessive force" That is the offence that you have described, and that is the proper outcome according to the Laws of the Game. As my dad would say "gie's peace", but I won't hold my breath for you having the good grace to change your mind. When have I said there was an offence of leading with the arm ? Violent conduct pure and simple .
  22. He doesn't look to see where the ball is and leads with his arm .
  23. You need to learn the laws of the game I'm afraid. That challenge would not be construed as violent conduct according to FIFAs laws of the game. It would and does .
  24. I didn't give you a red dot. I'll ask again - what law of the game meant that it was a warranted red card for Tansey? Violent conduct .
  25. What law? The law that governs the game of football . For the 2 that red dotted my post why not come out and say why you deemed it necessary instead of hiding behind the pathetic anonymous dot system ? What is more pathetic is moaning about getting a red dot on a message board. Suck it up. Sometimes people can't be bothered replying to nonsense posts so just red dot it to show that its nonsense. Not that it was me who gave you one since I was banned from giving out green and red dots ages ago lol To begin with I didn't moan about getting a red dot and secondly why is my post nonsense ?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. : Terms of Use : Guidelines : Privacy Policy