Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
  • comments
  • views

Is 'E' really so popular?

Sign in to follow this  


I was watching a quiz show the other night when they asked the question "What is the most commonly used letter in the English language?". The answer given, and accepted as correct was the letter "E".

But is it really? Even setting aside the ever increasing use of text speak and it's tendency to drop vowels the ever increasing use of social networking sites seems to have brought with it new habits which would might mean the statistics might need a little revision.

For a start, the letter "X" which is currently ranked third from the bottom can be seen at the end of most communications...several times in some instances. Surely that would move the letter far further up the table than it is currently given credit for? Then you have "LOL" which seems to have a foot on both the TLA and Text Speak camps. Currently ranked mid table (11th place), you would think that the letter "L" must be due a promotion.

These are just examples that spring immediately to mind, I am sure others also exist....but nothing I can think of would suggest that "E" deserves to be holding the crown for most commonly used letter....certainly not if you take a true reflection of how the English language is communicated in this day and age.

I have no idea where the statistics are drawn from, but it would appear that currently used (and apparently accepted) tables are in need of a bit of revision.

Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Comments

Good pertinent blog. It will be a while until text speak is accepted. But language, like anything, evolves, if that means "see" becomes "c" or "are" becomes "r" so be it. It wasn't so long ago that "whom" and "thee" were commonly used, and i'm sure the literati back then bemoaned its fall. Language does not belong to any one time, only the majority.

Share this comment

Link to comment

Interesting blog CD. Did you know that there are 1,135 characters in the blog and 142 letter E's. So 12.5 percent of the blog is the letter E

Share this comment

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is what you get when you have the disastrous SFA in charge. They invented this tournament, for what purpose I'm not quite sure. Who is benefiting from it?  They don't promote it, they certainly don't care about the supporters or the clubs. Is it from TV money? There must be some reason they have for agreeing to play it on a sunday at stupid o'clock.  The late great Jock Stein was said 'football without supporters is nothing', and he is right. The atmosphere at the stadium on Sunday was terrible,  and only came alive when the handbags came out at the end of the game. I think we all know that the crowd would have been bigger had it not been on TV, but you can bet your bottom dollar that some of the '15,000 fans to Hampden', "the glory hunters", will be searching in their cupboards for their ICT scarfs and hats for the final, and then never seen again at the stadium.
    • With global warming getting worse,  and the predicted  outcome getting very realistic, then continuing to play during the wettest and most difficult months of the year, weather wise at least,   is unlikely to allow for  any positive change in the circumstances that prevailed before and  during this match. Winter matches are , IMHO, no longer a viable scenario. Unless they are played completely under cover. Nothing is going to change  in the near future weather wise and the predictions are for it to get wetter and wetter. Northern Arctic ice, just to quote one deteriorating  situation, is melting at a phenomenal rate (with the Antarctic ice platforms also receding faster than ever expected 20 years ago)  that will lead to flooding and mayhem in the not too distant future that you have never ever seen before. The question is....  what, if any, changes will be made by the beaks in Glasgow to counter this global phenomenon?  My feelings are that they will react as they have always done, with no supportive plan for contingencies that they might reasonably  have anticipated would  happen eventually and have a profound and negative impact on our national game and the venues these games are played at. What is left then? Just wringing hands and clubs simply going out of business--if the pitches are completely saturated and, in addition,  the fans don't want to stand outside in the freezing rain or cold etc., then what?  It's often a razor-thin line between solvency and bankruptcy.  As Mr. McCawber once said in one of Mr. Dicken's novels..." Income one pound, expenditure nineteen shillings and sixpence.....solvency."        " Income one pound,  expenditure one pound and sixpence......bankruptcy."         Income 
    • I've been to a few under 1000 the first time we were in the first division. Arbroath on a Tuesday night springs to mind.  Just checked that Arbroath game, it was actually over 1000. I did think there was a few around the 900 mark round about then though.
    • Let's also not forget that CJT holds 10% of the voting rights at a general meeting - and it has already been suggested that if CJT goes defunct, so do these voting rights, which represent something like the third or fourth biggest single source of influence within the club.
    • Dunno about home crowds - there were several in 3 figures during the first season - but in Montecatini during the pre-season tour in 2006, I was in an away crowd of something like 12.😱