IMMORTAL HOWDEN ENDER

Aye but it ran down ma leg and ma sock is fecked.

To be honest it would be just like Brewster to start him at Tynie, play him out of position and hook him.

I had slip ons yesterday and was about to take them off but Hairy Chibber told me not to and I shat maself. :018: :thumb04:

I was more than happy to keep my mouth shut because it was a heat of the moment thing betwen 2 fans who obviously care a lot about the future of ICT but you run over and ask one of my mates to step outside, shat it when I got involved, apologise for it and then come on the forum and start bitching afterwards ............. says it all really It was the Brewsters gay chants that he took offence to... he just didn't see what that had to do with anything And the abuse that Lady took from you lot for having a different opinion was disgraceful as I said emotions were running high and I'm sure the amount of alcohol drunk beforehand didn't help :018: ;) :015: :D :P :021: You always dive in head first ya bitch - Read my post ya **** - Your involvement did get my brain into gear (thanks!!) plus you are such a scary specimen of manhood - I did not, never would and never will join in the disgusting gay chant - I never even joined into the GTF chants - I did start and did join in to the "Brewster Out" chants. If your mate thought that it was me he was wrong - It is rather rude to point and tell somebody to "Shut up" - "You tube" followed - I was nothing but polite, albeit blunt, to the two ladies in front of me - I know them and they know me. But if your mate is such a supporter - why didnt he join in with the encouraging chants - of which there were many ?

It was quite evident from the body language yesterday that Ian was never going to get on the pitch but some fans - not surprisingly - perceived it as Ian not bothering. If it hadnt been fer Brew - Ian Black would have been our main man - and if he went we would have coined in the spondoolachs. It is yet another reason why Brew should be ousted. But as long as Brew is there - Ian will get the silent treatment. The way ahead fer Ian is to look as if he is playing fer the shirt and not that he is fecked off with Brew. The boy will play fer Scotland one day - perhaps - if things go as we want - his last game fer ICT could be at Hampden Park.

Were there two wummin wearing blankets with them ?

Maybe not an actual fact but the spat between Brew and Black is well known and many fans / players have openly talked about it. Ian Black is still an ICT player - there is no equal to him in the role of playmaker - he is feisty (and sometimes down rite stoopid) but he is young and still learning. The only reason that he isnt playing is becos Brew wants to belittle and humiliate him - Ian Black is a THREAT to God. BUT Ian Black clearly doesnt want to play for Brew and it frustates me that my fave player reacts on the pitch in the manner that he does - He should be breaking every muscle / bone in his body to prove Brew wrong. He is playing into Brews hands with his latest lack lustre displays. He is going to Hearts and in his heart he is half way down Gorgie Road already - in my heart he may as well be there. Why should a new manager even consider him if he isnt part of the future. Thanks for the memories Ian and goodbye.

Do you not think that one pompous, arrogant, grandiosed, self centred individual at the club is enuff without the prospect of cloning.

My sentiments entirely davie. I will be there as well and I will be backing the team - I reckon we may have a good chance - but if Brew fecks it up tactically - then I am giving him double barrells.

So I heard :thumb04: :018: ;) :015:

Sorry it just reminded me of DJS and ?

Fixed it Johndo

Well - 20 is more than we took to Berwick and QOS midweek - and 1 was me - who are the other 19 dudes who think that Brewster should be sacked ?

There are always exceptions to the rule.

Get a striker before the window closes and we will survive - Brew will change his pack but surely even his inept tactics would be overshadowed by the players. Somebody new is actually coming in to something promising.

I still have a lot of respect fer Grassa - He is Inverness born and bred, he played for the Sneck and I know that he has the club at heart. He is just becoming a "puppet" and he probably fears fer his job and toes the party line. It would appear that he has got too big for his boots and he should remember his roots.

Feck me - I am a role model after all ;) :thumb04: :018:

Wow - it must be bad - I am agreeing with peeple - but this is spot on. Lets be honest - You take a look at the match - You take a look at the conditions - you look at the opposition - there is a feckin heavy rain and gale warning - Who would you pick - Barrowman / Rooney / Wood / Morais ? Would you go 4-5-1 or 4-4-2

I actually believe that we are close to having a strong team / squad and I believe that we already have the passion to survive. We need a centre forward and we need to dump Brewster. I fear he will be targetting Tokely, Duncan and Munro next.

Perhaps the rain got in my eyes ? He had relatively little to do - he was effective enuff - and looks good - but rarely ventured forward or showed the urgency of Munro or Tokely.

Shocking but I now have a clear diagnosis: Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is a personality disorder defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the diagnostic classification system used in the United States, as "a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and a lack of empathy." [ DSM Criteria A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:[1] has a grandiose sense of self-importance is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love believes that he or she is "special" and unique requires excessive admiration has a sense of entitlement is interpersonally exploitative lacks empathy is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

Yeah.... But he's used to that! He feckin love it - ask his wife and her whip _ where is f***ballers wife ? And as fer the handbag clash - the cheeky **** behind me said it would have been a case of Evander Hollyfield and a featherweight. :018: ;) :thumb04:

My mind travelled back to the Tartan Army days - the days of Berti Vogts. Ya went to a game dispirited, with little belief of actually winning, sang yer hearts out - We'll be coming" - and then after fantastic pre match bonding - you stand / sit there for a couple of hours and you have to watch the direst garbage imaginable. You say / sing / state yer resentment and then rejoin yer peers in drowning yer sorrows. Well I loved the Hamilton trip - apart from the period between 14.50 and 17.50. As fer the game I may surprise you by saying that the second half perfomance had positives and gives me hope of survival. The first half was wholly spoiled by Brewsters tactics but we deserved a point at least by the end and you could see that there was no lack of passion, determination and/or spirit. Hamilton were AWFUL and they beat us !! ESSON :015: :D :P Had relatively little to do but showed a sense of urgency from the first touch to the very last - regularly bantered with the fans and applauded at the end. ROSSCOE :021: :D :D :D :D My man of the match and now a TRUE LEGEND in my eyes. The man epitomised the old spirit. He gave his feckin all and how I wish he had scored late on. At the end he stormed off to the dressing room. I suspect he may have been a bit mad at the Brew chanting - on top of everything else - but he gave 110% yesterday and he showed that he is passionate about this club - RESPECT MIHADJUKS :D :D :D Looks good fer the future - Clearly not match fit - so why was he started ? MUNRO :D :D :D Best game of the season - Appeared to be relieved / released by the fact that he wasnt partnering Bambi or Maguire. Again made a B line to the support at the end - RESPECT HASTINGS :D :D One question - why did he start ? ROYSTER :D :D A bit of an invisible day - but why was he played wide, wide rite fer the first twenty minutes before being put back in to partner Duncan COWIE :D :D :018: One question - same one as the last ten smileymometers - Where was he supposed to be playing ? I tried to keep an eye on him and from my perspective his position changed FIVE times in the first half - and none where he had an influence - why didnt he start wide, wide rite instead of Royster ? DUNCAN :D :D :D Usual sturdy performance - unsung hero - and did he look cheesed off at being hooked or what ? VIGURS :D :D ;) So we have a young man who is capable of taking over the playmaker role from Ian Black - so why play him on the wide, wide left - even putting Royster in central midfield before him. MORAIS :D :D A bit Niculae - esque but that is not a bad thing. He isnt match fit and the conditions didnt suit either - he is not exactly the first pick for a relegation battle in a gale and driving wind. One for the future without a doubt BUT why did he start ? BARROWMAN :D :D :thumb04: Personally I would have given Rooney a run before him but AGAIN - one look at the conditions and I would have had Barrowboy and Morais sitting it out and sent on the two battlers - Wood and Rooney - from the off - especially with a howling gale behind us in the first half. SUBS - Why Wood first ? Why Rooney too late ? Imrie was dire - he spent more time trying to communicate with the fans. OH - and did anyone else notice that FIVE players - albeit surreptitiously - responded by a clap, a nod, a thumbs up or wink to the Brewster Out chants. So why didnt we win ? CRAIG BREWSTER