johnnykipper

Quality, nice one

he used to be boss of some conference team in england If he gets the job will he be announcing you as his assistant?

Rudolph? although is not just his nose thats a bit red these days its his whole face!

The present Chairman is just a spokesman for Mr Sutherland so what does it matter?

Maybe hes tied up McCormicks burd to stop her putting it about whilst he is inside.

East Fife v Raith Draw 3.60

I would prefer to see him demoted to car park attendant, surely even for a man of his intelligence it wouldn't be too taxing on the brain. Then again....

It appears that you are intimating that some of the money Pele blew on drink and gambling was not his own but from his employers, can't recall anything in the press about embezzlement but you appear to imply otherwise. Is this FACT too?

?10 per car is a bit steep.

Dunfermline v St Johnstone Draw 3.40

I will offer you ?1 for it, that appears to be the nearest offer so far, when does the bidding close and will you throw in delivery?

Has anyone ever seen JDM and Donaldinho in the same room together?

Ross County Draw 3.40

No I think it will come out before any individuals move on Maybe Marius will have a book out for Christmas.

Bet you drive about looking to follow that trail of water they leave on the road when they are rushing to one of their shouts. :thumb04:

This sounds serious, have you thought about getting the Police involved?

Raith v Ayr Draw 3.40 Dank je

Is it true that most of the existing fixtures and fittings from Millburn are being given away on a first come first served basis? No doubt most of the decent stuff has been snapped up by now.

Didn't most of the Superstar DJ's used to spin their vinyl on Technics before everything went digital, wouldn't surprise me if Sammy supplied a few of them. What did he do with the rest of his stock?

Get down Sammy Lee's for some Technics.

Your posting is either 1) a contradiction thus making no sense or 2) you know the reason why he is not being played but you know that this reason to be false and malicious. If that is correct then what you are saying is that he is being unfairly treated by both his Employers and Scotland. If you change the phrase " I do know the reason" to " I have heard a reason as to" then in my opinion your posting would make sense. My post makes perfect sense. It is one of the worst kept secrets in Scottish football, but because it cannot be proven, it is considered a rumour. There are some things that you hear that are false, and some that I know to be true. A few recent events in Glasgow involving footballers haven't exactly had the real truth revealed in the papers. I think you should look up the meaning of slanderous. You aren't quite getting this are you? I'll try once more. Tim liked having sex with small boys. Bob knew that Tim liked having sex with small boys but couldn't prove it. Regardless, Bob told the newspaper that Tim liked having sex with small boys. Tim denied it and sued the paper for slander against his character. Because neither Bob, nor the paper could prove that Tim liked having sex with small boys, Tim won. Note, the above story is fictional and is nothing to do with Boyd at all. Understand yet? Are you saying that you don't have any firm evidence to substantiate the reason as to why the named party is not played regularly but you do know it to be true as you have witnessed it?

Your posting is either 1) a contradiction thus making no sense or 2) you know the reason why he is not being played but you know that this reason to be false and malicious. If that is correct then what you are saying is that he is being unfairly treated by both his Employers and Scotland. If you change the phrase " I do know the reason" to " I have heard a reason as to" then in my opinion your posting would make sense. My post makes perfect sense. It is one of the worst kept secrets in Scottish football, but because it cannot be proven, it is considered a rumour. There are some things that you hear that are false, and some that I know to be true. A few recent events in Glasgow involving footballers haven't exactly had the real truth revealed in the papers. I think you should look up the meaning of slanderous.

Your posting is either 1) a contradiction thus making no sense or 2) you know the reason why he is not being played but you know that this reason to be false and malicious. If that is correct then what you are saying is that he is being unfairly treated by both his Employers and Scotland. If you change the phrase " I do know the reason" to " I have heard a reason as to" then in my opinion your posting would make sense.

Munro to sign a 2 year extension tomorrow.

Gringo = Draw Specialist, well done.