I'm not a fan of Brew by any means but this thread is dominated by anti-Brew comments. How about the rest of us at least limit our criticisms to a max of one response to a pro comment? Otherwise the thread's pointless.

I start with this quote from starchief just because it summed up my feelings of a thread... and it really does sum up my feelings now about coming on this forum, as I'm getting sick of reading thread after thread about Brewster and why he should/shouldn't go! We all have an opinion and we all have our chance to voice that on here but the arguing has gone to far and I think we should draw a line under it. We all know that arguing amongst each other on here will not change anything in reality FOR EITHER SIDE. So I propose this just so everyone knows where each other stands and thats that. You can call this a stupid idea or what you will but I don't care.

One vote each, NO extra information or arguments for your vote, just YES OR NO!

I'll start... Should Brewster go? YES

Edited December 14, 200817 yr by CaleyD

Brew in Highland News talking about Inces sacking saying he was sacked after 5 months what is the game coming to.

Yes brew its shocking that at some clubs a manager has to win games to keep his job.

Brew in Highland News talking about Inces sacking saying he was sacked after 5 months what is the game coming to.

Yes brew its shocking that at some clubs a manager has to win games to keep his job.

If I was to channel the mind of IHE for a minute, I would say something like:

Reading between the lines, there could be some pressure on Brew here and he can sense it. He has obviously noted that the fans are discontented and this is his way of telling us to **** off. Possibly also, he could be sending a message to the board saying that he has only just started in the job.

Or something similar.