Jay_7

I was under the impression that Yantorno requested to be released? :024:

Agree with Starchief. Black is definately not an attacking midfielder. Rankin and Cowie are attacking midfielders.

AFAIK they are not closed yet. That report is really just on the SPL holding "crisis talks" should Gretna go under.

I assume that's directed at me? It's no secret the players I don't really rate are Tokely, McGuire, Duncan and Bayne. Players I do like... Marius Niculae has been a breath of fresh air, he just isn't put to his best possible uses by Brewster. Cowie is an exceptional talent, as was Rankin and Dargo when we still had them. I don't "slag" players. I give criticism where it is due.

The fact that 9/10 times he couldn't hit a coo on the erse with a banjo?... Put simply, he's just not very good. Yes he's doing an unglamourous job and largely goes unnoticed, but look at how McBain performed put in exactly that role on Saturday...

Yes but saying he can GTF is a bit extreme. Black playing poorly still makes him 10 times the player Russell Duncan ever will be!

Interesting fact: I was once thrown out of and barred from the Jimmy Chungs in Dundee for "eating too much" Admittedly it was the Dundee Uni Rugby Teams post match meal... :015:

:017: Are you on something?... He's one of our most creative players!

The saga continues... More mentions of Denzil to prove himself yet no first team opportunities... :017: Clickage

**Cough** Iain Brines :017:

Not as far as I'm aware. If you're looking for a good quality Chinese takeaway, look no further than Milburn Takeaway :021:

Looks like Brewster reckons all is rosy now... :018: Also he's spoke out against the officials along with McGuire... Brewsters comments here McGuires comments here

I was just testing... :023:

I have to see Pendulum!! :crazy07: Annie Mac also playing will, or at least should be awesome!

Brown had 170 appearances I believe :024:

It's about fecking time we stopped playing him. Yes he gives a lot of effort, but effort does not win games. County next season I hope.

Second time this season we've conceded 4 to Aberdeen :007:

------------------Fraser------------------ Proctor Tokely Watt Hastings ------------------McBain------------------ Cowie-----------Black-----Paatelainen -----------Niculae------------------------- -------------------------Wyness----------

So were you covering your eyes every time a long ball was fired from defence? I lost count of the number of times Hastings, Munro and McGuire hoofed the ball up the park when under no pressure at all. Proctor did not do this once. Tokely being played in an attacking role, kind of worked this time, but I believe this was down to Aberdeen not expecting this. It'll probably not work again due to his lack of pace. As I've mentioned on the match day thread and the thread on confidence in Brewster, why leave it so f*cking late to subsitute? :008: That is not being tactically astute. Why not make all 3 substitutes when it was brutally aparent we were sh*t defensively?! Why play Paatelainen on the left?! From what I've seen, he's only got a decent right foot! Brew OUT! :008:

All that proves is that he wants them to do more :017: The fact he has no tactical knowledge makes him **** poor.

Well there went that rumour, Munro with captains armband on from the start... :024:

Todays result has not changed my mind about him. How did he do OK today exactly? Late subs, didn't use all subs, players out of position. Grade A pish from a pish manager. :008:

Just back in from a match I felt was very very even. Aluko ran rings round Tokely and Proctor for much of the first half. I really fail to see why McGuire has become so unreliable after signing permanently; I genuinely can't remember him putting a good shift in after the January transfer window. Looking at how the team was positioned, I genuinely couldn't see where our goals were coming from... Cowie doesn't really play his best in centre mid despite playing there for County. Imrie has yet to impress me, and I was sceptical about Tokely being pushed up to attacking right mid. What was Duncan playing at with his goal celebration? Funny as it was, there was no need for it at all! Then to top his performance off, he gets himself sent off for an act of idiocy. I said it before and it will take a lot of convincing to change my mind but he should never have been given a new contract :008: 2nd half and I felt Proctor and Hastings were really struggling. McGuire made more of a fanny of himself. Without Duncan it appeared McBain was orchestrating the midfield beautifully! A definite contender for MoM! Brewster as per usual, left it until the death to make a change. On came Richie Hart to a huge roar from the crowd and put in one his best SPL performances. Imrie recieved a standing ovation from a few in the North Stand which quite frankly beggars belief, I think he's mince. On came Paatelainen didn't really play to the best of his ability. Why was the 3rd sub not used?! :008: More tactical inability from Brewster, we badly needed to take McGuire out of the game and put on fresh legs at the back! If Duncan had not been sent off, our game badly needed a 2nd striker to play off Niculae, someone like Wyness. The game would have been very different but I doubt the Ego would have gone with that option. Positives from the game: Great overall team performance, the team as a whole looked hungry for the ball and had more passion in this one game than our last 10 put together! Fantastic individual performances from McBain, Niculae, Hart, Cowie and to an extent Tokely. Negatives: Duncan... Need I say more? His presence in the team is a negative IMHO, the mere fact that he was offered a new contract is a negative :008: McGuire... again need I say more? Grade A pish from him yet again. :008: Dougie MacDonald - Card happy ****! A sub-standard referee - Not even fit for the 2nd division! Brewster - Late substitutions and didn't use all 3 subs. When will he f*cking learn?! :008: Get him tae f*ck! :33: Long ball tactics... and again, need I say more?

Absolutely in terms of length, the signal will just end up interfering with itself... :010: Good gracious that sounds terrible... :015: I can appreciate the money is a limiting factor here with Fibre link not exactly cheap but after buying that cable he'll be more than half way to the cost of a complete Fibre link system anyway. As for the "Cable is only as good as its weakest link" I didn't mean literal links I meant as good as its weakest point. E.g. Cat5e cable that has been stretched ever so slightly too far so that one of the twisted pairs are not in the same twisted lengths as the other pairs, will only perform at Cat5 speeds because it will be unable to cope with broadband signalling. A parallel cable with one duff pin on one end will not be able to function well either. Mixing USB 1.1 and Fibre link will result in a maximum throughput equal to but not over what USB 1.1 is capable of. I can appreciate that the Fibre in this instance is to eliminate outside interferance and to overcome USB's limited cabling distance but if that is the case then surely the vastly more reliable alternative would be to use Ethernet for the signaling and get a good quality camera that has Ethernet output?