Wow - clacher - have you seen how this thread has plummeted quickly into obscurity. I can wholly understand the sense of humility in your response which echoed my concise but polite post. But does it not aggrieve you slightly that we have yet again been proven right but have had no sense of recognition from the gang of bitter individuals who derided, chastised, abused, ostracised and attempted to ridicule and humiliate us earlier this year. As ever we had the courage and the reticence to stick to our principles and our right of personal opinion, even under constant barrage.
I like you agree that we should not respond in an infantile manner and stick our two fingers up at our detractors and shout " Fek yas - told yas we were feckin rite all along". That would be childhish and bring us down to their level. We should simply be happy that we were vindicated by CC himself and content ourselves with a mere smirk of satisfaction that we were rite all along.
LONG LIVE THE NEW CHARLIE CHRISTIE. :001:
You really have a deranged way of looking at things :017:
first off all, NO ONE said that Charlie wasn't going to struggle in his first season!
You and clacher's argument was/is that he is not the right man for the job, which you now have so radically changed to say how you were right to slag the 5hit out of him when he needed the support more than ever! Others and myself have always pointed out that CC's appointment is for the long term good of the club instead of having a big name for a couple of seasons and he obviously has the best interests of the club at heart.
You are either fishing for an argument (if so, well done) or you are talking absolute caak!