Joonya

They Scored We Didnt We didnt score they did They Scored We Didnt ................ They Scored We Didnt Whats missing........

Has anyone on the board thought why brewster is being called for the exit by over 90% of fans. This is the first time in our history fans have called for a sacking. CC left before it got that far. Pele and robbo were scouted out, as was Brewster the Player/Manager. There is only one reason fans want him out.... BECAUSE HE'S RUBBISH AND STILL NO WORD from ANY of the Pro-Brewster camp... WHY??

Technically, we didnt go back.... Brewster 1 was a player as well as the manager and continued to lead ON the park where it mattered. Brewster 2 is only a manager who shows vertually no knowledge, sense or emotion during matches or interviews.

If someone has any spare time tomorrow, can they try and see how many times this and other very similar comments have been made in the last 3-4 months (and longer in some cases)... Why, if so many fans are voicing the same opinion, do the board not sit and take notice...

I swapped my weekend off from work to be able to make this match, and that i exactly what I am going to do. I will be sat there (at this rate on my own as no-one else will probably turn up) and wave my brewster out flag with pride that ICT are and always will be my team, and Brewster will surely be shown the door hopefully sooner rather than later. should brew be gone by next week, I shall have a new banner reading 'THANK FECK' lol

... or indeed win promotion A96. they were after all the only winning team in division 1 today and have ad some good results of late... I would love for just 1 of the 5 people who say brew should stay, to back up their argument. Surely they dont comment as they are all embarrased to be in support of the most inept manager to grace the SPL...

I was so damn close with my prediction on his comments. I have almost literally pi55ed myself laughing at his first comment.... "They scored a penalty and we didn't score, end of story. " :018: ;) :015: :D Hey craig - :thumb04: :P :021: :D :D Did you see him 'jump' for the ball last week... it was nearly as hilarious as brewsters after match comments today. lol

22 games played - 17 points... less than a point per game. We've 0 points from 21 possible on this streak... to think if we'd won these we would have gained more points than from the previous 15 matches... Also we'd be sitting in 3rd place had we won all these matches. If games finished at half time these last 7 league games, we would only have 2 points. 16 conceeded in those 7 games - 40% of which scored within 5 minutes of the re-start. 3 league goals scored... rooney with 2 of them yet he doesnt get a start, and a defender (rosscoe) with the other. We have scored more than 2 goals in just 1 league game this season. Home, Killie, 27th September, 3-1. We have Conceeded 3 or more goals in 5 matches this season, 4 of which in the last 6 league games. Our last clean sheet, in the league, was 9th August 08, whereas we have failed to score in 45% of games. This time last season, we had 31 points (motherwell, aberdeen and rangers the only sides we hadn't beat in that time) Strikers' league stats this season... Rooney, started 7, scored 5 Wood, Started 10, scored 2 Barrowman, Started 12, scored 2 Now - if ANYONE thinks that the above makes attractive reading and thinks that brewster should remain at the helm, do please, enlighten me........

I posted this 'predicted brewster comment' on the matchday thread not long ago... "we lost by just one goal, and to a soft penalty. we didnt get the luck and they did. they scored and we didnt which lost us the game in the end. I am not worried that falkirk are fighting against bigger teams whilst we sit back and do nothing. we will come good because it is the 20 fans' fault for not supporting the team these last few months, not mine for being totally unable to provide tactic ethics. On the plus note, the lads are smiling in training"

I can just see the after match comments from brewster now "we lost by just one goal, and to a soft penalty. we didnt get the luck and they did. they scored and we didnt which lost us the game in the end. I am not worried that falkirk are fighting against bigger teams whilst we sit back and do nothing. we will come good because it is the fans fault for not supporting the team these last few months, not mine for being totally unable to provide tactic ethics. On the plus note, the lads are smiling in training"

lucky for us rangers pulled one back against falkirk. Else if the score there stayed one nil, we'd be 4 points adrift with Utd, Hearts and Celtic coming up...

I really like the one on the left there, where the white has seperated the blue band from the black... best part is, i dont think it looks rangers-esque at all... the back making sure of that

Really like the one top left there thekarl. Can you try that one again with blue 'piping' underneath the black band? I really think that blue and red need to be included to identify Caley Thistle, and not caley OR thistle.

Indeed - many many congratulations to the growing family. Brilliant news!!!

It's good too see that talks are continuing with Don Cowie. Despite all the rumours about rangers, leeds etc etc, I think this is some good news and I seriously hope they secure him on at least a 3 year extention.

I'm starting to like the band on the shirt coming up the ide and accross the chest. By changing the colour scheme slightly, this looks more like an away shirt when black replaces red... Perhaps some of my ideas/adaptations would look better on the proper formats rathe than a 'paint' template. lol

Looking back on the designs already, I think we are all agreed that mostly red and white with a hint of blue and black is the best choice? I also think that Scotty's last effort was pretty good, but too much red. So I have adapted it slightly to incorporate a bit more blue and black...

I admit some of mine are naff, but they're only ideas for something different. I have though come up with a better effort IMO. Not soo sure on the red and black designs that have zero blue... I tried this one with a hint of yellow in it too, but it didnt come out as good as i hoped.

Perhaps I am getting a weeeeeee bit carried away with this, just like i did on the New Kits thread. ;) Some pretty good designs appearing, but even I admit that some of mine are naff... :018: :thumb04:

starting to run out of ideas now....

A few more designs from myself... wish i knew how to do these desgins on the proper formats, but my knowledge of PC's stops at the power button Some of the designs are looking really good btw.

Well done to all involved indeed May I be the first to offer the first drafts on this topic, and add a wee comment... Designing a mostly white kit has proved rather hard so far, as whatever I come up with tends to looks rather 'rangers'-esque, and I've deleted a few designs already. anyway - heres my first offering - i've not got any knowledge of the programs specified, so i've used my old templates from the 'New Kits' topic.

not as such no, but the fact they have up to 10% of the ICT shares certainly does. EVERYONE on here IS behind ICT, and I am greatful for the fact the supporters trust has acted on behalf of over 80% of the fan base to get answers from the club that need to be answered. It doesn't matter if 60 people turned up for the meeting or 6000. The point is, the trust held the meeting to come up with a legitimate statement for the club to answer, and for the fans to finally be heard because quite clearly, especially since brewsters re-arrival, the club seem to think they can survive without their customers. If they were basing their legitimacy on their shareholding, why arrange a meeting via press release? Where do you get the figure of them acting on behalf of 80% of the fanbase from? They were acting on behalf of their members and those who attended that meeting. Members are fans so therefore putting the viewpoint forward from the fans. There was nowhere in the statement from the supporters trust that said they demand brewster be sacked - the statement came from discusions between those in attendence to get a fair and justified balance of opinion for the club to answer their questions. The 80% of which I refer to comes from any voting poll for the fans opinions of craig brewster.

i was just thinking the same thing BBB... the way I see it you have come on here to ruffle peoples feathers and have not, so far, come up with a decent post about WHY people should be getting off brewsters back. I have said it before and I will say it again - everyone is entitled to their opinion, yourself included, but to slate people personally and brand all those who think a change is needed as the 'lynch mob' does not, IMO, bring any sort of decent argument to the debate on wether CB is the man to guide us to safety. By all means, enlighten me!

not as such no, but the fact they have up to 10% of the ICT shares certainly does. EVERYONE on here IS behind ICT, and I am greatful for the fact the supporters trust has acted on behalf of over 80% of the fan base to get answers from the club that need to be answered. It doesn't matter if 60 people turned up for the meeting or 6000. The point is, the trust held the meeting to come up with a legitimate statement for the club to answer, and for the fans to finally be heard because quite clearly, especially since brewsters re-arrival, the club seem to think they can survive without their customers.