STFU

I genuinely admire your positivity, Robert...but no way was that a fair result. We stole a point today!

Dodds told press that anything other than a win wouldn't be good enough, so I look forward to him totally ignoring that fact and spouting the same old in his post match drivel.

I'm sure we'll find out in the next of the club's regular communications

I sit in the main stand, but chose not to attend due to the pricing

Not like the amazing atmosphere they're creating over there is having any positive impact on the pitch either!!

On this occasion, I actually think the club are right not to have commented. Until the SFA decision is made, there's no need for us to get involved in the drama. Keep focus on this weekend's match.

Maybe get them all a bus shelter to huddle under....the same as fans in wheelchairs are made to do

There's nothing motivational in being awarded a 3-0 walkover for a match in where the quality of play would have seen us struggle against the local primary school. If Queens have broken the rules, then they should be punished. If we benefit from that, then we need to show a bit of humility, not got all Billy Big Baws about it.

Yeah, make us replay the fixture so we can be beaten again

I really despair at those who think fans should just hand over their hard earned and expect nothing in return. The club have not delivered on a single promise, on or off the park, for a long time. When things don't pan out, they're either ignored/conveniently forgotten or it's everyone elses fault. The very least fans should expect is to be entertained...otherwise what's the point? I'm not having a go at the players, I don't boo players, I clap them onto and off of the park. They can only do their best and we don't often see players not trying. However, if they are set up to olay boring football, then the best they can play is boring football. That's not on them.

We could win every game between now and the end of the season and I don't think it would make me feel any different. ICT has become a hollow, soulless club. The football is not entertaining, the feeling of being a part of things has gone and watching so many people off the pitch stealing a wage is unbearable.

Did Scot Gardiner not tell us on the podcast that we were all too stupid to understand the position that Robertson held, so there was no point trying to explain it?

We failed to capitalise on other results, but people will still be satisfied because we maintain an unbeaten run which means nothing and didn't lose. Honestly think I'm done with this season...anyone want to use what's left of my season ticket?

Nobody from the club directors, ceo, director of football or manager gives a flying f*ck what fans think....has that penny not dropped yet?

Pathetic or not, that's their choice and if the club choose to ignore them, then

So what you're saying is that the club should ignore these people and accept the financial hit?

Interesting comment from him about his departure

So the club should just ignore the fact that some fans will not attend because of the decision? To be clear, not saying those fans are right/wrong, just highlighting the situation.

That's precisely the discussion I'm trying to generate....is it appropriate? "Because it's always been done like that" is the kind if thinking that would have us all still living in caves and wiping our erse with leaves. All I see is a lot of assumption that it's a financial decision and that it saves the club money....how many other things do they do/have they done which don't make obvious financial sense? If we can open/use the West Stand every other game because Kindergarten 94 help generate an atmosphere that really helps the players...then does this decision mean we're willing to forego that for some matches? Most attendances for the last few seasons could be accommodated in the main stand, so why are we opening other stands for so many other games?

Pretty sure we don't heat the North stand

I ask because if we're talking a couple of stewards for a couple of hours and a couple of turnstile operators for an hour and a bit of electric, then it's low hundreds of pounds. If that decision causes some people not to attend, and comments in various places suggest this is the case, and/or it further erodes fan affinity, then is it really financially prudent? You can argue that it's ridiculous fans would take that stance, but it doesn't change the fact that they do and it shouldn't be dismissed, especially when every penny is needed. If there are other cost savings and we start getting into larger numbers, then I totally get it.

What are the actual cost savings from closing North Stand?

Apparently players are covered by the PFA if they end up out of contract while injured. We gave him another contract to keep him at the club, so nothing moral or otherwise in the decision.

I'd settle for the club having a single toe in reality right now

I'd hope we had some certainty with Sutherland given the fact we extended his contract after he got a long term injury!