Scotty

see first post in this thread .... same article, same player and same reason we are discussing it ....... you must need more beer HC :blah01:

Squad numbers dont have to be submitted to the SPL until sometime in July - any numbers shown until then are either last seasons or just BS. The provider of that stats program probably had DC listed as #7 for County last season and just switched his team without changing numbers ..... have patience, I am sure it will be updated when the players have actually got their numbers for this season !!!

If you shelled out £100 for a home kit then yes you have been ripped off especially if you ordered it yesterday after the new kit [or perhaps we should say old kit with new sponsor] was officially released !!! The away kit (black) hasnt been released yet so I am sure that the commemorative versions for those who did pay £100 will be bang up to date.

yeah - nervous but optimistic ....

thank gawd you didnt post it on here ..... someone already threatened us with legal action over a less 'offensive' picture .... this would have made them have heart failure !!! must echo what CCC said - that was very funny ..... network errors happen (to others ;) )... but praying i never get a wrong number :rotflmao:

It sounds like terms have been agreed with the player and agent (which is usually the major stumbling block) and we just have to dot all the i's and cross the t's with the club and it just so happens the people we need to speak to are out of the country on holiday. Doesnt sound like it will be a saga and from what I have seen so far, Charlie may well have pulled off a great signing. reading between the lines, it also sounds like the sponsorship of flybe might have helped here .... wasnt it mentioned that one of the things being discussed with the player was flights up/down the country .... hopefully flybe gave him or the club a sweet deal to sort that one out :021:

What you complaining about Richard .... didnt you get a grey one ? :015: :015: :015:

I love the guy already :021: Yes, thats a nice quote ... and having watched the youtube links, we may soon forget about Dargo ... that boy knows where the back of the net is and seems to be able to not only position himself well but also take a touch and belt it home.......

but you can't believe anything you read at the moment anyway...... sure they didnt miss out the OR between the 1 and 2 in 12 ??? ..... Motherwell and St Mirren Clearly he will be otherwise he would have signed our contract. not necessarily - there is also the whole "girlfriend" thing that made him want to go back south ...... or so we are told. However, absent friend is right .... " Craig Dargo is history - ICT is the future - Roll on the new season!"

The club change one of their two strips every year so this will happen every time the sponsor changes .... although I could see the point of synchronising it with the home kit. Having said that, I think the new away strip will be a huge seller and with it not changing for two seasons then buyers will get a full two years out of it before the sponsorship deal comes up for renewal.

looks like the structure will be at one end (outlined in red) with space for more if required ..... story here: Highland News Caley4life - to add a pic click on 'additional options when posting and attach a file !

It appears to be the same as last season with the exception of the new sponsor ... so its still great. Dont think anyone got "ripped off" considering ICT are one of VERY few teams who dont change both strips every year or issue a 3rd or even 4th kit. The design of each kit changes every two years but the addition of a new sponsor is a commercial issue .... would you rather turn down 500K ??? I still have and wear ICT tops that have Citylink, Scotrail, Sharp and OneTouch - far from being a rip-off, these "old" tops serve to show that I have been an ICT supporter for a long time (and still fitting into a top I bought more than 10 years ago is also very satisfying ;)) !!! Maybe ICT could produce iron-on sponsor logos for those who want to cover One Touch with FlyBe in the same way that they did when the Scotrail/Citylink change was made although personally I think that would look pretty naff !!!

Havent got one :002: :002: :blah01:

Give them a chance ..... they probably only got the tops in the last day or so and the press release likely went out as soon as the photographers had been at the stadium !!! When i first read the article, it appeared without a photo so that suggests that Fiona only got it this afternoon from the photographer. I am sure it will change very soon.

At the end of the day France SHOULD beat us. On paper, they are superior to us at every level. However, Football is played on grass and not paper and over 90 minutes anything can happen. ICT have shown time after time that form or perceived quality mean nothing .... wins over Celtic and Hearts while still a lower league club ... 7 points out of a possible 9 against Rangers last season ..... As Jimmy Greaves used to say every Saturday lunchtime ... "Its a funny old game ....." and Scotland CAN do it, the question is WILL they do it.

Here's a few Toronto ones I like - "all together" - used when the supporters groups are trying to get the various sections back into the same timing !!!! - "Its all your fault" - shouted at opposition keeper when we were 3-0 up in last home game - funny as fcuk at the time - he turned round and smiled & - cult hero Danny Dichio gets the treatment - thinking the same tune could be adapted to -Rossssssco- - same tune could be used for I-N-V ... E-R-N ... E double S spells INVERNESS ......

like it :015: :015: :015: how about ..... Caley - clap - clap - clap (repeat until fade) or Gimme an "I", Gimme an "N", Gimme a "V" ... etc etc (repeat until tired, finish at next home game :015:) seriously though - have a look through youtube, there are loads of good ones on there that could be adapted for ICT.

sorry - ok, back on topic - do we need to add an extra bit to cover admin fees if using paypal ? that question seemed lost in the off topic bits.

you should get it by the weekend ..... in the meantime here's a pretty picture :004: [attach=1]

Guzz .... When you say you have moved ... I hope you are referring to your move to Inverness and not a recent move within Inverness ? Are you still where you were when we last saw you ? There is something totally unconnected to this subject in the post as we speak ... and it was sent before you mentioned that little factoid :015: :015:

As CD says, there are many forms of EPOS so that in itself is no indication of what they are planning. I cant help thinking that the Toronto model might just work here ....... At TFC I have been supplied with my normal season tickets, each ticket has a barcode on it which is scanned when I get to the stadium gates. If I need to leave the ground for any reason I am scanned out and scanned back in again when I return. All of this is done reasonably quickly using a wireless handheld scanner linked to the ticket Db. When the scanner scans the barcode it either shows a tick or a cross. If its a tick I get in, if its a cross, I dont (fortunately never had a cross yet). This could work for the singing section if fans were scanned out of the main or north stands and scanned into the singing section. Because its all stored in a database, the club would also be able to pull data from the system to see which fans consistently went to that section and perhaps even give them priority for big games !!!! It would also serve to considerably speed up the entry into the ground at the turnstile bottlenecks !!! Now here is a clever part ..... TFC has linked with Ticketmaster (but ostensibly it could be done with anyone who has the technology) and after registering on the official TFC site I can view all my ticket information online. When online I have several options (up to 2 hours before kickoff). I can reprint tickets if I have lost or forgotten my originals or I can email them to any email address. When you reprint or email the tickets a PDF file is either downloaded or sent to the email address and this has a new barcode on it. You print out the PDF and either you or the person you emailed it to can show it at the gates for scanning. If you try to use the original ticket, it wont work as the validity of the original barcode has been cancelled. The "email your ticket to someone else" part of this scenario could work for a ticket exchange program ..... you organise online (on a special board on here perhaps as suggested earlier in the thread) for a ticket swap to take place and then using the system you each email tickets to the other ... hey presto the ticket situation is sorted.

please confirm total amount required if paying using this method ... it was £10 per share + £ ? to cover admin costs ?

As I posted earlier in the thread, I think its a good idea in principle, and one that everyone (club, fans, website(s) and stewards) could and should get behind to make it work. If asked, we will be happy to help in any way we can with the process. I have no doubt that the club have been working hard behind the scenes to try and get it up and running before the start of the season, especially as it has the full backing of the Chairman which is important. Whilst we can perhaps criticise certain areas of the plan for lacking some of the minutiae that will be required before launch, I have no doubt that the whole planning, costing and logistics that have been gone through so far have not been 5 minute jobs. The minutiae will come, and hopefully the launch will not be rushed and then prove problematic (or to be another PR disaster) but rather - as CD mentioned above - dot all the i's and cross all the t's even if it means it isnt in operation for the first home game of the season. I do agree with Caley D about the meeting however. Whilst it is admirable that both the Chairman and DoF attended and "openly answered questions", I cant help feeling that it was an opportunity missed in some respects as they had the opportunity to put this whole Dunfermline thing to rest by making a statement available prior to discussing what are very good ideas. Until the cloud hanging over the Dunfermline incident is lifted, any talk of the singing section is likely to have a number of "What if ...." questions attached to it and that could prove to be a cumbersome millstone. I am glad that those who attended the meeting feel that they had their questions answered as that is important, doubly so if they have been vocal on the subject as some have. For those that have been vocal about this and couldnt be bothered going to the meeting then sorry, you had your chance and the excuse that you didnt know what questions they would be answering doesnt wash. If you feel strongly, you go along and you ask your questions anyway. if they dont answer them then you ask them again until they do. if they flat out refuse to answer questions then you are free to have a moan and shout it from the rooftops. If you didnt go because you couldnt be bothered, then you have no real justification for being vocal on this subject any more. For those that couldnt go because of work, or because of geography (eg. myself, Caley D, IHE, Gringo etc etc) then we have to try and raise points on here in the hope that someone else can ask them or that the club might see them and consider them. I want to be positive about this whole initiative but I cant do that 100% until questions that were raised about an incident that happened 46 days ago, and promised by various parties to be answered in a reasonable timescale are addressed.

I have always remembered a particular customer's name from my time in retail ......... I think I only dealt with him once or twice but the name stuck in my brain .......... R.C. Poupard [think about it !!!]

As we have said on numerous occasions, we have always been happy to offer help or be a part of any process that assists the fans of ICT. I would have only one stipulation about any request of this nature (once they decide whether they actually want us to be a 'tool in the process' ;)) and that would be for the club to give us the courtesy of open, honest and full communication about any process we are asked to be a part of, something that has not always been the case.