alimci

Just got an order in from here Chocolate fags and Spanish Gold are still fantastic :022:, but lucky tatties, wow - I guess when you're a kid you don't care about smashing all your teeth out and your entire face being covered in cinnamon.

What's not to believe? Good football and fighting performances under CC. Utter shyte under Brewster since January. Maybe we're watching different teams? :024:

pole-dancing. Unfortunately

Ice cream with ICT coloured sauces spelling out "I love Russell Duncan" in reedee's own unique spelling. Or she's sicking up really weird furballs.

after buying

The bad run under CC wasn't nearly as bad as the run we're having/have had (hopefully the latter) under Brew. When we were losing under CC, I still thought we were playing good football and were having a run of luck going against us rather than us doing anything wrong. I certainly wasn't going to matches and wanting to walk out after fifteen minutes, as I have done with recent away games.

of Sparta

of unwanted

:clapping03: :clapping03: That post-split run two years ago under CC seems like another century now.

I cruise to victory.... The End

breakfast, should

Jeez, glad I checked the sticky for once or I would have just strolled up to Tynecastle as normal :010:

(somewhat gingerly)

Butler Dinning Defender and midfielder - both pretty old

Aha...

Whose shirts are these? I'm so glad we aren't sponsored by a company with Recyclage in their name - sounds like a mixture of recyclable and sewage On the other hand, some of our players.... :015:

And why do we want players from a team about to relegate to the English fifth division anyway? :010:

psychologically scarred

One thing I have never been accused of is being a member of the sweety rustling PC brigade. I'm not sure I even understand why complaining about some jerk making irresponsible comments makes me one. But I guess I'll just be accused of being either lacking in true intelligence or having no sense of humour, neither of which is actually correct, so we'll have to differ on this one. Nice post and I will agree to differ on this one. The point I was trying to illustrate, for your reference, is that I find within Clarkson's sarcastic humour there is (more often than not) a very valid and well thought out point but he tends to wrap it up in comments aimed specifically at antagonising anyone who disagrees with him to great amusement of his fans. It is a very valid and effective way to argue as the person who you are in debate with tends to get flustered and angry losing all ability to debate the topic properly (a tactic used to great effect by a certain member of this forum) and since my attempts at drawing an argument from yourself using similar tactics have failed, I tip my hat to you sir. And me to you, sir :003:

One thing I have never been accused of is being a member of the sweety rustling PC brigade. I'm not sure I even understand why complaining about some jerk making irresponsible comments makes me one. But I guess I'll just be accused of being either lacking in true intelligence or having no sense of humour, neither of which is actually correct, so we'll have to differ on this one.

No, he doesn't tell it as it is. He talks a load of utter bullsh*t and people who don't know any better believe him. A few years ago he had a tirade about horses being ridden on roads and said that if people could afford a horse they could afford a trailer and a 4x4 to tow it, so they could take it some off-road location. There is so much stupidity and uninformed opinion in this single statement it is staggering. The man is a total tube. And probably contributed to dangerous driving around horses on roads because "they shouldn't be there".

Actually, I really liked these Bremen strips, maybe we could go for that in red and blue

Absolutely nothing :003: