On official site that the transfer of the stadium is finally complete and are looking also for new sponsors as tullochs have agreed to the removal of their name as part of it.

Also stating we should now be In a far healthier position financially.

Anyway what brands do people think would be good to sponsor the stadium now.

 

Old age trumps misunderstanding. -  You are wrong!

 If the poster  to whom I am  replying has not been adjudged to be off-topic then how can a direct reply to what he  or she has said be off-topic?  Because, to this point, the adjudicator has therefore clearly affirmed that the original poster's  remarks are within the tolerances of being "ON TOPIC and so any reply to what the poster has said MUST therefore also be within the realms of that poster's thoughts and statements and therefore must not be "off topic".

Effectively, in this scenario, the suggestion that replies are off-topic are actually a misjudgement or an attempt to curtail free speech because the adjudicator does not know what further thoughts  the person who is replying might have about then personally addressing the issue under discussion  more fully. And, in fact,  needs to say a few words  up front so that  everyone understands where he or she is coming from and what he or she sees as to what might happen in the future.

 

 

12 minutes ago, Scarlet Pimple said:

Old age trumps misunderstanding. -  You are wrong!

 If the poster  to whom I am  replying has not been adjudged to be off-topic then how can a direct reply to what he  or she has said be off-topic?  Because, to this point, the adjudicator has therefore clearly affirmed that the original poster's  remarks are within the tolerances of being "ON TOPIC and so any reply to what the poster has said MUST therefore also be within the realms of that poster's thoughts and statements and therefore must not be "off topic".

Effectively, in this scenario, the suggestion that replies are off-topic are actually a misjudgement or an attempt to curtail free speech because the adjudicator does not know what further thoughts  the person who is replying might have about then personally addressing the issue under discussion  more fully. And, in fact,  needs to say a few words  up front so that  everyone understands where he or she is coming from and what he or she sees as to what might happen in the future.

 

 

you'll be getting writers cramp mannie - beginning to ramble a bitty.