I wouldn't argue at all with that, but I would just say that IMO the BBC news is negative about pretty much everything, it seems to be a rule with their editors. To give a non-political example, a few weeks ago they announced with an air of doom and gloom that "Only 10% of British adults have taken up sport as a result of the London Olympics". Let's turn that around. 4 millions adults have taken up sport as a result of the Olympics. Phenomenal!
The typical BBC news headline is "EVERYTHING IS JUST RUBBISH.........according to a new report published today."
Now, had that report said the exact opposite, it probably wouldn't get a mention at all, but if it did, the story would be "Critics have poured scorn on a report which says everything is just great!"
You could be onto something there. However even allowing for my personal bias, I thought that suppressing the hacking of emails story was scandalous - far more sensational, or rubbish as you put it, than the story they used that a YES supporter was commissioned to write a pro- Indy article for £100.
Also, the recent story about the Latvian authority who was quoted as saying that Scotland would need to seek entry to the EU. He said that rUK would need to do likewise, but BBC Scotland never bothered mentioning that.
It was getting so predictable that I would read up on a story during the day, then see what spin BBC Scotland put on it at 6.30.