IMMORTAL HOWDEN ENDER

:D

:D Wouldnt waste ma feckin energy.

Said what mucker - I bet you an Ayrton Senna that me china plates in TW1 will have a rite bubble bath at your stoopid rabbit and pork. Me and my plates and dishes or me horse and cart have been dawn in TW1 fer a butchers hook and they all spoke the lingo.

I lost in interest in the Pars when Brewster left them! He arrived in Inverness a few weeks after I moved here - that gave me added incentive to go and watch them. Feck me :D :D :D :D

By which you presumably mean people in their 50s? :D :D :D No - I mean older people of any age who are intolerant of yoof, are disparaging of any feckin "fun" at a footie match, just feckin tut and criticise instead of joining in and constantly whinge - Me - i am an old fecker who doesnt give a feck and sings ma feckin lungs out fer the cause. Most peeple find that I grow on them - please tell me who you are and buy me a double voddie :D WE ARE SECTION G

I suspect that the sudden Mars Bar appearance on this thread was probably due to an unconscious psychological link with Heilandee - They both appear to be sweet, friendly and enticing but end up making ya want to boak. :D

Yea. I was thinking that. the ladies in the shop are lovely. They are very nice to my sis. They got her a McBain singed shirt :) Did she get it cheap cos of the iron pattern on the back ?

Totally agree - Most peeple come back anew / afresh / subdued / compliant after a ban. And things are looking up when birddog becomes a self acclaimed ersehole. Ersehole - another lubbly word.

I am a serious poster and I have no patience with banter, innuendo or sarcasm. :)

Better make shure that Pele doesnt use the same old invisible ink that he used fer ICT contracts :)

Hotchop is a prime example of what destroys a credible thread.

Never mind the BS - what does Section G mean to you ? Me - Although I am now a rare home attender it is always where I head to - because my mates are there - I am not and never will be a Main stander - that is where any chanting usually eminates from - that is where I get most of the craic and banter. It aint a Section B Airdrie or anything like that - it is camaraderie - Nowt wrong with going away and singing - "We are Section G" - its a feckin joke fer fecks sake. The "old gits" :) appear to think that it has a hooligan link - well let them have a go if they think they are hard enuff :32: B) Section G is the "womb" / the nursery / the breeding ground of the future. I fer one support the Section G mob - who often cannot put there feelings into the "old git" mentality or vocabulary. SECTION G TILL I DIE - and feckin proud of it.

I looked at this as being just another diddy cup final but a feckin good day out with the lads - Am I alone in now feeling that this Sunday has taken on a considerably higher profile and could even prove to be a defining moment in our season ? This is a real chance for the fans to unite, the players to perform - and give us a boost to move forward. Lets hope this feeling has moved on to the dressing room. BRING IT ON - Lets feckin rock Perth.

Gee Whizzzz Wow - that was a more monumental and thought provoking contribution than I expected.

We're down as the the away team in the Final. What schools did you two go to - turn the feckin scarf upside down - sorted.

*starts to read, sees word 'muppets', yawns and leaves* Thanks for your opinion and your intellectualism - you've been in Leeds too long :) :32: B)

A rather deep - but appropriate quote - from Jim Morrrison of all people for the Mods: ?I'm a word man. See, there's this theory about the nature of tragedy, that Aristotle didn't mean catharsis for the audience but a purgation of emotions for the actors them selves. The audience is just a witness to the event taking place on stage.? Personally I feel that this form of conflict resolution is healthy but I feel that some posters are at a danger of becoming self indulgent :) and still projecting the blame Tips to mange conflicts - The following are tips to avoid a situation from ballooning into a conflict: ?Be open with your feelings?be polite but firm, be assertive without being aggressive ?Be calm, cool and composed. Anger never won an argument. Besides there are more chances of your being heard if you keep your emotions in control and your voice down. ?Refrain from the blame game. Blaming one another will only add fuel to the fire. ?Remember the old adage, ?It takes two hands to clap?. Listen to the other person?s version of the entire episode. This may sometimes make you realize that may be you are at fault and the other person?s action may stand vindicated. ?Respect one another?s rights. Showing respect is a positive attitude and even your worst enemy may reciprocate it. When such a reciprocation of respect takes place, it is easier to resolve conflicts. ?Be genuine in your concerns and complaints. Do not feign emotions or make false allegations. ?Keep your line of opinion based on reason. Do not jump to impractical conclusions. ?Try to heal wounds rather than opening fresh ones. Do not add insult to injury. ?Opt for a compromise. If you force people to consider only your part of the problem you are sending the other party into a defensive position and virtually shutting out all doors to an amicable solution. ?Learn to forgive?most importantly learn to forget. I still feel that there is a definite "old git" flavour to this thread - not sure if some of the younger posters are not aware of the height of present emotions - whether they dont (or cant) express their feelings in a non-craic type manner - or if they foolishly believe that this will wash itself down the drain I wonder if some are concerned that they will be "picked on" - "bullied" - or "humiliated" if they respond in their own words. I have a feel of nepotism, agism and tribalism about all of this. The "old gits" appear to be projecting the blame on the yoof. My words of wisdom to the yoof - say what you want to say and lets see if ya can walk the walk and remember: ?You can only be young once. But you can always be immature.? :32: and Nobody cares if you can't dance well. Just get up and dance (or sing karaoke!!).? This is so much better than the weekly psychotherapy group that I am currently facilitating

:D :) :blah01: There is a response but I would get banned !!

Visit My Website

'Female Viagra' discovery claim The drug works directly on the brain's pleasure zones - A drug that failed tests as an antidepressant is being hailed as "Viagra for women" after surprising but not unpleasant side effects. In three separate trials, the drug flibanserin did wonders for women's flagging sex drive despite doing nothing to lift mood. :) The accidental discovery is akin to Viagra's - it was originally designed as a heart medicine but failed. The US work was presented at a sexual medicine meeting in Lyon, France. :blah01: Lead researcher Professor John Thorp, of the University of North Carolina, told the European Society for Sexual Medicine: "Flibanserin was a poor antidepressant". It's essentially a Viagra-like drug for women in that diminished desire or libido is the most common feminine sexual problem, like erectile dysfunction is in men - Professor John Thorp who led the research said: "However, astute observers noted that it increased libido in laboratory animals and human subjects - So, we conducted multiple clinical trials." (which produced multiple orgasms??) The women in the studies who took 100mg of the drug once a day for their low libido reported significant improvements in their sexual desire and satisfactory sexual experiences, he said. The trials were funded by manufacturer Boehringer Ingelheim and involved 2,000 women in the US, Canada and Europe. Some doctors are sceptical about the need for pills to boost female sex drive. For some, reduced sexual interest or response may be "normal", says Professor Irwin Nazareth or University College London. Others say relying on a pill could stop couples talking through underlying issues. By the way - I am a Non Medical prescriber - Stop me and Buy One :D

Feckin brilliant :) :blah01: Mind you - if he came on this site he would be one of the feckin milder posters. :D

It is old and it is beautiful and its colours they are fine but it is not what you are thinking of, its the Buckfast Tonic Wine Buckfast lifts court case threat The fortified wine is popular with young and underage drinkers - The makers of Buckfast have lifted a threat of legal action against Glasgow City Council. The tonic wine producer J Chandler & Co presented a petition at the Court of Session, claiming it was discriminated against by the city's licensing board. It said some retailers had been told not to stock the drink. But the licensing board has now given a legal undertaking that no such policy exists. Legal action against South Ayrshire Council was ongoing, the firm said. The drink, which is produced at Buckfast Abbey in Devon, has been highlighted in debates in Scotland on alcohol abuse. The fortified wine has an alcohol content of 15% and is popular with young and underage drinkers in the west of Scotland. :) :blah01: J Chandler & Co said minutes of Glasgow's Licensing Board meetings provided proof that officials had negatively singled out the product. The company said it was due to call a retailer as a witness who would give evidence that the board wanted to make it a condition of his license that he would not sell the product. :D However, the case was settled before it was heard by judges, with Glasgow Licensing Board providing a written agreement. It said "an undertaking is hereby given that it does not operate a policy or practice of seeking undertakings or of imposing conditions relative to the stocking or selling of Buckfast Tonic Wine in licensed premises or prospective licensed premises, not is there any intention of doing so in the future". It also said it agreed that underage drinking and alcohol misuse was an educational, not a product issue. A spokesman for the board said: "There has never been a policy of discriminating against this or any other product, and neither is there any intention to have such a policy. "We were happy to confirm this in writing to the pursuers in this case, and on that basis they dropped their legal action." Jim Wilson, spokesman for J Chandler & Co, said: "We're happy that they've realised we're not the problem." He claimed previous undertakings made by the licensing board through solicitors had been broken, and added if this legal undertaking was breached the board would be in contempt of court. When the court action was launched in March, the company said it was targeting South Ayrshire Council, as well as the Glasgow authority. Mr Wilson confirmed that the action against South Ayrshire was still going ahead. :025: :025:

I can confirm that you were psshed.

Would ya feckin adam and eve it ? An invite to get your bacon and eggs down to the battle cruiser fer some Tommy Tupcker, have a bubble bath and get Brahms and Liszt of yer boat race.