CaleyD

Brewster must be away topping up his tan or resitting his exams as Malky seems to have been doing all the talking this last week or so....and making a right royal erse of it by the look of things :015:

With predictions like that you could usurp IHE as the resident Psychotic

?10 :015:

I didn't want to win anyway.

The way you change the rules as you go along....you could get a job with the SPL.

What's even funnier is that they won the Clydesdale Bank Award for "Best Hospitality Package"......must have been given for the added value of the bugs in every meal :015:

"Last" I win....next game :015:

What's the prize?

[attach=1] redblueballposter.pdf

Yeah, he's taking a few days off to go skiing in Whistler.

Since we're being pedantic it's actually UEFA :016:

The E.mail from the club said that all tickets are ?12 so I'm assuming that is the case.

Oh come on Hamish...your an educated man, surely you know that not all the information provided to support the theory of a hoax comes from conspiracy theorists. Personally I don't care whether or not they put a man on the moon 40 years ago and if I was pushed to give a decision as to whether I thought it happened or not then I would be very hard pushed to decide one way or the other. However, whether they did or not, there's very little doubt in my mind that at least some of the footage being passed of as being shot on the moon is faked.....and this only serves to add weight to the hoax theory. As with any two sided argument based around an alleged hoax it is always far easier to dismiss/discredit the hoax hypothesis over the apparent real hypothesis. We see it happening just about every day on this forum where you have one group who are quick to dismiss every rumour through lack of evidence or credibility of source, and the same happens whenever you have more than one source for information as opposed to a single outlet. In terms of the Moon Landing, we have NASA's Hypothesis which comes from a single source and never waivers which is pitched against an abundance of Hoax Hypothesis from many many different sources. In order to discredit those claiming a Hoax and defend the alleged "real" scenario you will very often find that they totally ignore much of what an individual says and instead focus on how one may differ, even in the minutest fashion, to another. In effect you end up pitching all the Hoax Hypothesis against each other and remove all focus from your own...thus removing the pressure of having to prove anything. NASA have never done anything to prove their version of events other than churn out an endless stream of "experts" to say "It's real" and until such time as they invite some of the Hoax Theorists to look first hand at the evidence then the conspiracy claims will continue. If I, and the many others who think the same, are right in saying that much of the footage/evidence produced is faked....then it matters not a jot if they put a man on the moon unless they admit to that fact and have other irrefutable evidence to support the claim. However, we all know it would be cause major meltdown in the USA if NASA were to turn round and say...well we kinda lied to you all these years about the footage and stuff we showed you, but honestly we did put a man on the moon. There's nothing to be gained from proving it one way or the other so why bother? What's important is what we are capable of doing today and in the future and how that serves mankind, not what might or might not have happened 40 years ago when the Americans were having a **** measuring contest with the Russians.

If you watch the image real close you can see Brew giving Malky lessons on how to tap like a pro.... [attach=1]

Duncans goal from 30 yards out against Falkirk in September has to be a contender.

I hope your doing more than pies for your wedding!!!

The thing I find amazing is the people who say "don't believe everything you read on the internet"....the phrase which has taken over from "don't believe everything you read in the press". I have only one question for these people.....for your argument that it "did" happen....where did you get your information. Unless you were there to witness the event then your sources are no more or less credible than the others in all honesty.

The sooner ICT add the word "Streetwise" to their dictionary the better.

What magical entity is preventing TCS disappearing into the aquifer?

Tickets are available by contacting CaleyD or Gringo Jnr via the forum or e.mailing [email protected] Forum Members can reserve tickets and pay for them on the night. A Pay Bar will also be in operation on the night. Men and Women both welcome. Watch this thread for further information on how you could get an opportunity for a bit of revenge on one of the site Admin :029: Any Questions then Please Ask

L_G mentioned this recently on another thread. That is NOT the way this deal has been presented. A number of people from the club from Brewster to Grassa have talked about "the chairman picking up most of Marius' wage". If that's not the case then it's yet another example of our board treating the club's fans and players with total contempt. As has been said by several people over the season....the next set of club accounts could make for very interesting (and revealing) reading for many people.

Another member of the "old boys club".....just what we need :029: Don't think so Caley D. He is very much his own man which probably wouldn't suit the Tulloch Yes men. I have no real problem with a Tullochs "Yes Man". It's people like Sutherland who got us where we are and built the stable platform on which the club now rests (or as stable as you get in football these days). So long as a decision is made one way or another then people at least know where they stand. No point in taking in someone who is their own man and then tying their hands and not allowing them to get on with things, just as much as there's no point in taking in a "yes man" and then expecting them to make big decisions off their own back. And above all else, we shouldn't be taking someone in just because they're "one of the lads". They have to be able to perform whatever duties they are charged with. Be that following the instructions of someone else or being a leader in their own right.

My message to Marius would be an apology for the way in which so called "professional businessmen" have fecked up so badly when it comes to the basic principles of management and turned your signing into a bit of a circus. - They failed to control fan expectations by touting you as the man who would single handedly take us to the top 6. - They failed to manage the changes with the rest of the squad which resulted in your signing being seen as undermining their worth to the club. - They have failed in their attempts to spin the whole wage issue. You've done nothing wrong, you get on well with the vast majority of the squad, your liked by the vast majority of the fans and you've kept your head down and got on with doing your part as a player. For that you should be applauded.

Take money out of the equation and I certainly think Niculae was a worthwhile signing. Anyone with an ounce of knowledge about the game can see that he's a step up from anyone we've ever had playing in an ICT shirt in terms of class. Has he been value for money? I don't think he has been worth ?5000/week to ICT, purely on the basis that I think we could have retained the services of an on-form Dargo for less than half that price and very likely have achieved the same outcome for the season. I don't buy the whole "Orion paying half his wages" line either. As I understand it the only money to come directly to the club from Orion is a ?275,000 invest for a 12% shareholding.....that's not player sponsorship, that's the purchase of a stake in a football club. So, although the investment perhaps made the signing possible, it is ICT who are paying 100% of the wages. You trying going into a shop, buying ?10 worth of goods and telling them to stick your tenner in the charity tin on the counter instead of in the till!!! All that aside though, I don't think it's the money that he's being paid that has caused the majority of the issues. I think it's the way it was done and the fact that existing squad contracts were all but ignored last summer when we were chasing after Niculae. The whole thing smacked of "you're not important we'll deal with you later". I worked in Change Management and the first thing you learn is that change, whatever it is, unsettles people. Fact...more people leave perfectly good jobs which they have been happy in for years during periods of change due to uncertainty than for any other reason...even when the changes will have little to no impact on them. If you want to avoid that then you have to remove the uncertainty, if you want to remove the uncertainty then you have to show/tell/demonstrate to key employees that they are valued and will still be a part of whatever comes after the changes. For a footballer that's all about contract length, wages and bonuses. Had the club taken the time to review the contracts of our key players 12 months ago then I don't think we'd be seeing half the issues we are now. ICT showed some welcome ambition when they signed Niculae but they made the big mistake of taking existing player loyalty for granted and I think that's the reason they are now paying the price and it has very little to do with whether or not "Niculae was worth it" A prime example of some people ignoring the fact that "It's not what you do, it's the way that you do it".

How much is road tax for a horse these days?