Yngwie

3-1 ---

Indeed, but it would have been even better if the penalty had been like Barca's the other night. (Apologies for the commentary!)

Our league record currently stands as W8, D8, L8, F33, A33!

Terrific result, one which I was hoping for but not daring to expect, even though we've had the better of them this season. I wonder how many more of our players have just been added to Aberdeen's summer transfer target list?!

Tansey's agent?

How about "farce recognition" systems!

I see Foran was in charge for the game, because Duncan Shearer had somehow managed to get a touchline ban!

P&J reporting that Foran has now torn his calf in training.

This balls thing is a cock up not a stitch up, but one of those butterfly effect or Sliding Doors scenarios where so many things will now go on to be very different to how they would have been if the initial draw had been completed. Different draw = different semi-finalists, different winner, different losers, different budgets for next season, impact on contract extensions or otherwise for players and managers etc etc.

I see Lubo Moravcik is the one tasked with pulling the warm balls out. Surely Celtic will have briefed him not to match them with us again, after we've put them out 3 times since the millennium. Indeed, Moravcik was playing on the first of those occasions and was wrongly credited with Bobby Mann's goal.

Nah, must be lower than that. 1 in 105?

Has Storey been officially credited with our first goal then? As far as I can see he was merely in the vicinity of the player who did put the ball into the net, and Storey didn't even celebrate as if to pretend that he'd got a touch. He'll be glad of it though, as his 1 goal in 10 games is a pretty grim stat for any striker.

GongXiFaCaiGoBallisticCelticAreAtrocious

Can't believe how close that score was. Just imagine what might have happened if Celtic had been facing all of Kilbride instead of just the East part!

Stupendous, audacious strike from Roberts. Goal of the day, however, has to linlithgow's at County. I'm referring of course to their second one, a great team goal, but their first is worth watching a few times as well!

He's communicating with team mates, inspired by beach volleyball I suspect. Just in case anyone doesn't know what I mean, or needs reminding:

I think the ICT tweet caught the moment much better - "I think a little bit of wee might just have come out."

Our last 4 Scottish cup ties have comprised one being won in a replay and 3 being won right at the death! Cup wins don't come easy.

Well you should have! January transfer window thread a month ago:

"It's just a flesh wound!"

Thankfully we can look back laugh about it, and I hope he can too. Who knows, we might not have won if it had stayed 11 v 11. Glad to see he's staying with us for at least another season, and it gives him a chance to demonstrate to our fans that Greg Tansey is not actually "the only decent things to come from Liverpool".

Danny Williams and Carl Tremarco have been offered contract extensions. https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/sport/football/inverness-caledonian-thistle/825755/undefined-headline-1561/ Note also the comment by Hughes about some of our players being reluctant to sign up, preferring instead to keep their options open (ie find a better offer), which is understandable.

There's a lot of ill-informed, wild speculation on this saga........so I'm now going to add to it. There was much press/twitter comment on deadline day about Tansey's release clause being "ambiguously worded". Let's run with that. There's a clause that refers to a £200,000 minimum fee being required to release him from his contract at ICT, but the actual wording doesn't oblige the club to sell him there and then. Just for example, "Should a transfer offer of no less than £200,000 be received in writing by the employer within a transfer window, the Player will be granted permission to discuss personal terms with the club making said offer." So, everyone thinks there is a release clause, but it can be argued that there isn't really. Due to the lack of time to find a replacement for such a key player, ICT decide with some reluctance to enforce the strict wording of the clause, rather than the spirit of it, call Tansey in and apologetically point out that whilst he is now entitled to speak to Aberdeen, it would be pointless because ICT are under no obligation to sell him and have no intention of doing so. As a sweetener, though, they will agree to let him move on in the summer, perhaps even for less than £200,000, to keep him motivated. Tansey then has a choice. Consider his contract to have been breached, walk away and get into a lengthy legal battle about how the ambiguous contract clause should be interpreted, with only a chance of success. Agreed to ICT's proposal. He therefore "elected" to stay at the club, happy to see out the season, but having little choice really. And shortly afterwards, he publicly disassociates himself from the agent who failed to secure the release clause Tansey was assured was in place. Wild speculation, as I said, but I'm pretty sure it's an awful lot closer than the "loyalty" explanation. Football's a short career and no player at our level chooses to earn half his market worth. You'll also note that there was nothing in the statement that said anything along the lines of "Greg looks forward to seeing out the remainder of his contract". I don't think I'm being "negative" here - perhaps a bit cynical, granted, but most of all, realistic.

Whilst we'd all love to believe that he'd rather be here than earning double and potentially challenging for the league title, I can't help thinking that ICT's statement is cleverly worded and somewhat economical with the truth.

Apparently his agent thought he could get him out if it, but it wasn't as straightforward as he thought..... But seriously, well done Greg, business as usual please.