Yngwie

He’d be a football creditor and would have to get paid every penny he is due, otherwise the club is finished.

Unfortunately it seems more likely than ever before. But it’s what the fans want…

Oh dear is not good news at all, if that is the £300,000 RM alluded to on the podcast then it sounds like we would have been depending on that to be a going concern. A bit unlucky for the club that this buyout happened, I guess.

Morrison still believes the Kelty plan is the best option for the club so there was no chance of sacking its architect.

It was increasingly clear that Morrison wasn’t the right person to take us forward, but what we really wanted was an orderly transition to someone with a better plan and the money to do it. I fear we don’t have that in place and could descend into further turmoil, if that were possible.

I see the 2023 accounts still aren’t available at Companies House. No idea what is actually happening there but a possible explanation is that IF they filed paper copies, which they are entitled to do, then provided they were received by the specified deadline the club would have met its obligations. With paper copies, it usually takes Companies House about a week to scan and upload them.

Yes he did, taking his loan balance to £1.5m apparently.

But they didn’t, did they. Directors seem to have stopped making unconditional donations to the club a long time ago. The battery farm project created an asset, a risky asset, that they could purchase and provide the club with significant funds it would not otherwise have had.

Annan v ICT 13 July Euros final 14 July. Potentially a bit awkward if any of our players get a late call up.

There definitely some good years in the middle but from memory I think they were mainly our years in the top flight, where incomes are so much higher, and as an added bonus players can be sold for significantly higher amounts (£1m between Christie and Niculae being our best ones)

My first phrase was that the projects failed miserably, and I’m not disputing how damaging they have been in various respects. Just pointing out that they have made significant financial contributions to help te club’s finances. So you could say they were catastrophic and I would agree, but they were absolutely not financially catastrophic. Let’s not be in denial that they actually made us a lot of money, which is simple fact.

Both project failed miserably in terms of meeting their targets, but I’m not sure you are right that they were actually catastrophic financial failures. I know it’s not what anyone wants to hear, but these Gardiner projects seem to have made significant non-footballing contributions to ICT. RM stated last week that the club’s interest in the battery farm was recently sold for £250,000, and in the previous year or two there were statements that the club rented the stadium and provided other services to the concert company for sums that would surely have been well into 5 figures. So it seems to be the case that these crazy, failed schemes have actually generated more income than a year’s worth of season tickets.

Might be that, no idea, but £300,000 rent for a car park? SG is CEO of the century if he’s negotiated even a small fraction of that amount for us for renting out a bit of wasteland!

Billy Dodds chipping in too, and confirming that he is still on our payroll.

Mike Edwards and Stevie Riley on radio Scotland right now.

Proceeds from the club selling its soul? The buyer is certainly not someone who can be trusted to pay promptly!

One of the many interesting revelations in the RM interview on the pod was that an receipt of about £300,000 expected in April had not come in yet (did I catch that right?). What could that be? The only sums of that magnitude I can think of would be monies from the football authorities, a transfer fee or sell on clause from another club, or perhaps a tax/VAT refund but I’m not sure what could have given rise to that, or any of them really. Any ideas?

I’m sure I’m not the only one hoping you have made a fortune in the USA and are looking to invest in ICT!

Iain Vigurs (now 36) released by Cove, having played just 29 minutes this season.

I see that a vacancy arose today at Rangers for a CEO. Just imagine if they want our very own Scot Gardiner. What should the transfer fee be?!

Anyone who steps forward can just get rid of Gardiner themselves, if they think someone else could do a better job!

Or Spotify.

As others have said, fair play to RM for offering to do this and well done to the pod guys. The Chairman provided a lot of interesting info and came across as very open and honest, no attempt to spin things, just telling it like he sees it, and I think we can all appreciate that even if we don’t agree with him. I thought, however, that he did a very poor job of explaining/justifying the Kelty move, when he had an opportunity to sell to fans exactly why it is needed or beneficial. He’s not a great communicator, as we already knew. The interview also highlighted that he is not a hands on, close to the detail type of chairman. He clearly relies heavily on others like the CEO, which is unsurprising as he has his own businesses to run full time. He also confirmed what to me has apparent for a long time, that he would happily step aside if someone else stepped forward. He was basically inviting them to do so.

Not sure about that - if the battery farm proceeds and generates a huge lump sum after administration, the proceeds would go to Ross Morrison who has security over it. So it would not be in his interest for the club to have sold it on the cheap. The directors buying it have taken a huge gamble, there is a fair chance it is worth zilch, time will tell. Another observation - the battery farm project has generated £250,000 income for the club, which whilst a lot less than was intended, means it has been very worthwhile, vindicating the decision to pursue it?

IF Fife Council have any right to veto the arrangement because it is not in line with the community usage intention for the pitch, that still doesn’t necessarily mean that they would - they would have to decide if they want a load of extra income for absolutely no effort, or whether they are so rich they don’t need it.