Pardon me if this has been picked up in another thread, but according to the club’s Wikipedia entry, Seventy7 is already listed as the “Owner” of ICTFC. Because Mr Makwana has said he doesn’t expect significant movement until the end of this month, I am taking this more likely to be one of these things that can happen on Wikipedia when an entry is made by an unofficial source, and that a “Citation Needed” should be in place. Or is it?
I imagine that Seventy7 would become “Owners” when or if the company legally acquires the 50.48% of the voting power that Ketan Makwana has said he intends to own…. if a narrow majority holding is considered to constitute ownership.
So has Ketan Makwana now paid for a majority shareholding, or is this simply the kind of misinformation that can occur due to the way Wikipedia works?
Pardon me if this has been picked up in another thread, but according to the club’s Wikipedia entry, Seventy7 is already listed as the “Owner” of ICTFC. Because Mr Makwana has said he doesn’t expect significant movement until the end of this month, I am taking this more likely to be one of these things that can happen on Wikipedia when an entry is made by an unofficial source, and that a “Citation Needed” should be in place. Or is it?
I imagine that Seventy7 would become “Owners” when or if the company legally acquires the 50.48% of the voting power that Ketan Makwana has said he intends to own…. if a narrow majority holding is considered to constitute ownership.
So has Ketan Makwana now paid for a majority shareholding, or is this simply the kind of misinformation that can occur due to the way Wikipedia works?