Leaderboard

We have bought a couple of week players......................they play for a couple of weeks and then get injured

Based on a (very) old set of accounts (2006) [as I dont have recent ones to hand] we had 1,891,681 'ordinary' shares issued at that time. We also had 600,000 'A' Ordinary shares, 300,000 'B' Ordinary shares and 3 'C' Ordinary shares. Each share had a nominal value of £1 so technically our share issue was worth a little under £2.8m I am not sure of the details, and someone will likely come along and explain it but I believe that the 1.9M Ordinary shares are the "voting" shares which shareholders big and small hold which give you the right to come along to AGMs and vote. A,B, & C shares are of the same value and although they allow you to attend AGMs etc they hold no voting rights. Think the "C" shares were Caledonian, Thistle, and INE (but could be wrong). However ... at the end of the day, the shares are worth only what someone is willing to pay for them ..... and a little over £1m would indeed buy more than 50% of the club .... would not be selling mine though .... its only 250 shares but its my own little bit of ICT that I will own forever and which I never expected any return on anyway. Cant really comment on the speculation about the offer until we know more details and who and what is involved. If its someone (or a group) with the long term good of ICT in their hearts then its definitely to be considered ... but if its a "benefactor" with no prior connection then I would be very wary.

Yes! But if it is denied ICT should demand an English panel of judges to review the evidence and continue to make a stink about it with a view to embarrassing all of these neanderthal dopes in Glasgow. The panel of judges could easily be drawn from Norwich because it ios a sleepy town on the East Coast where the word bias has never been heard of. Don't you think that cameras /video now have to be introduced into Scottish Fotball. ? Anybody agree with me on this pressing issue?

I sympthise with the refs. they got a difficult job. I have seen the incidents quite a few times now, and with both....i cant honestly say im sure one way or the other. In the Tokely instance....there are times when i do think it looks as tho he might have caught the player MILLISECONDS before the ball. The ref dont have the luxury of such facilities, he/she has to make a decision instantly. So in cases like this....i do feel sympathy toward the ref. Plaayers should be a lot more honest if you ask me

I'm shocked you think that. Seemed a great tackle to me. Bobby Moore or Alan Hansen class. Why do you think that? what game were you watching? Ross makes contact with Naysmith's knee before he gets the ball. Not much in it and a difficult call for the ref. Considering the fact there were other valid claims in the first half I don't think we should be feeling cheated at all. Onwards and upwards.