I don't really see where your line of argument is leading RBC. Maybe you just need to let off steam (BTW, as I remember it from my schooldays, chauvinism means "excessive devotion to a cause").
The term 'junior partner' is in common use and has nothing to do with age- you've just inferred it (as if a few months makes any difference anyway. It's been reported many times that the date of Caley's formation could be 1885 OR 1886).
If you're going to come up with terms such as 'important' then you really have to define what it means, and in saying that I realise that the Jaggies were important to YOU! In the greater scheme of things neither club could be said to be important at all!
At a more local level, I think you'd struggle to get an objective measure of either club which backed up your case. Evidence to the contrary is easy to find: In 1993 Caley reportedly paid Thistle ?8500 for the services of Billy Skinner.
Caley's wage bill in (I think) 92-93 was ?130,000, larger than most clubs in the SFL div 2 at the time.
Finally, in looking at the relative size of the merger partners, it's obvious that any residual hatred is one-way.
Now just compare this to County - ICT (they hate us, we don't really care) and even Scotland - England.
The hatred's always one way...... why would this be?