I think he means from the prime ministers, not you :015: :015: :015: :015:
I'm usually a believer in the '****-up' rather than the 'conspiracy' theories, but I make an exception here.
Under the 30 year rule, we're finally finding the truth of what happened in the 1970s, and the lengths the establishment would go to, when Scotland threatened to go it alone. We're sold this propaganda that only we (uniquely amongst all the world's nations) are too poor, stupid etc to govern ourselves. Yet the British establishment kindly hangs on to us just as a huge favour.
The truth is, there are two explanations why we have never been cut adrift to get on with it:
1) Labour would be unelectable in the UK without Scottish votes. And, more importantly:
2) The civil servants who really run the UK (regardless of which party is in power) are in thrall to the Americans, who in turn need Scotland for strategic reasons, eg Holy Loch and all the early warning stations further north. Not to mention pioneering nuclear power at Dounreay and such like.
Like Charles I have a healthy contempt for politicians, even the ones I will probably vote for, but the people have a duty, once a particular set of numpties have been voted in, to make them accountable (eg the recent expenses scandals).
And I'm afraid the current set of numpties have had it coming for a long time: at least 30 years, since I was old enough to go to the local working men's club with my old man and see these corrupt, arrogant councillors in action, fixing things for anybody willing to buy them drink.