Jump to content
DONT PANIC! - Site Upgrade in progress. Apologies for any downtime, broken stuff, or weird looks !
Posted

Apparently, Sky Sports is reporting that ICT are to have an emergency board meeting this weekend as a result of the financial implications of Rangers, or Sevco 5088 to give them their proper name, being voted to Division Three. Surely things can't be that bad.......can they?

  • Replies 218
  • Views 26.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • What I think is really sad is the fact that ICT were almost excluded from the SPL due to apparent self preservation. How we mumped and moaned about the attitudes of clubs that made up the SPL back in

  • Just in case you didn't see it in the other thread. Dear Mr Cameron. I feel your statement regarding newco Rangers admittance to Division Three was badly timed, poorly worded and a PR disast

  • gordieict
    gordieict

    No one has kicked rangers when they are down, Rangers went into liquidation the Newco applied for league entry and have been told to start where anyone else applying would, in fact they ar lucky they

Posted Images

Featured Replies

I agree - new firm derbies all over again :clapping:

Interestingly though why has the newco delegation turned up at the SPL AGM meeting this morning at Hampden and been allowed admission :ponder:

One of two things....

- NewCo & OldCo "delegations" are one in the same at the moment and the OldCo still hold a share in the SPL until such time as they are requested to surrender it by the SPL Board (i.e. Doncaster and Co, not the clubs).

- They've been invited along for the formal feck off farewell.

What a shame he did not say something like that on Friday. I am encouraged by this statement but it is disappointing that there was no apology for his PR Gaffe on Friday. Hopefully there can be constructive progress towards league reconstruction now.

It is important for all to understand that KC is just a front for "The Builder" and the poor chap is set up to take the flak. He has worked for our dear savior for many many years and he is one of the few who haven't been "let go" over the years. Let's not forget that Kenny's sporting background is very much shinty and far removed from what his position now demands but he really isn't a bad guy. The football business is not an honest one - a fact maybe Kenny is finding hard to deal with.

What a shame he did not say something like that on Friday. I am encouraged by this statement but it is disappointing that there was no apology for his PR Gaffe on Friday. Hopefully there can be constructive progress towards league reconstruction now.

It is important for all to understand that KC is just a front for "The Builder" and the poor chap is set up to take the flak. He has worked for our dear savior for many many years and he is one of the few who haven't been "let go" over the years. Let's not forget that Kenny's sporting background is very much shinty and far removed from what his position now demands but he really isn't a bad guy. The football business is not an honest one - a fact maybe Kenny is finding hard to deal with.

And who's puppet/frontman are you?

What a shame he did not say something like that on Friday. I am encouraged by this statement but it is disappointing that there was no apology for his PR Gaffe on Friday. Hopefully there can be constructive progress towards league reconstruction now.

It is important for all to understand that KC is just a front for "The Builder" and the poor chap is set up to take the flak. He has worked for our dear savior for many many years and he is one of the few who haven't been "let go" over the years. Let's not forget that Kenny's sporting background is very much shinty and far removed from what his position now demands but he really isn't a bad guy. The football business is not an honest one - a fact maybe Kenny is finding hard to deal with.

And who's puppet/frontman are you?

Certainly not the one that you seem to support. :moon:

Gatecrashed or Invited? :wink:

From STV News:-

Sevco Scotland Limited chief executive Charles Green and manager Ally McCoist are representing Rangers at the meeting, as the old company’s share in the SPL has not been relinquished.

Only thing I support is ICT.

Glad to hear we support the same cause but with different personal opinions. Let's just live with it. :drinking05:

Money is the string with which a sardonic destiny directs the motion of its puppets.

Very apt IHE

Good news - another useful revenue stream :clapping:

http://ictfc.com/new...-get-a-qleg-upq

Maybe something across the back next....always remember the austrian league teams used to be a little OTT though with the advertising on tops, shorts and socks....

AustriaVienna_h.jpg1441832_LARGE.jpg

Edited by Tichy_Blacks_Back

Orion sponsor front and back of shirt already.

Appreciate that may have been tongue in cheek (ewwww!!!) butt (I'm on fire) there's strict limits on where advertising can be placed.

From SPL ....... http://www.scotprem.com/content/mediaassets/doc/Playing%20Kit%20Sponsorship%20Regulations%20%28CURRENT%20Approved%20by%20Board%2017.05.07%29.pdf

The Shirt

A Club may also include a sponsor or advertiser on the front of the shirt. The space available to a sponsor or advertiser is a total area of 200cm2 on the front of the shirt, horizontally across the centre of the chest. Lettering used in this area must not exceed 10cm in height. No manufacturer identification, design or other elements may be incorporated in the lettering used.

A Club may also include a second sponsor or advertiser on the back of the shirt. The space to a sponsor or advertiser being a total area of 100cm2 on the back of the shirt, above the player name, horizontally centred between the shoulders. Lettering used must not exceed 5cm in height. No manufacturer identification, design or other elements may be incorporated in the lettering used.

A Club may have different sponsors or advertisers on its away shirt from those on its home shirt.

The Shorts

A Club may include one sponsor or advertiser on the shorts. For the avoidance of doubt this is additional to the Club crest (maximum area 50 cm2) and the manufacturer’s identification (maximum area 20cm2). The space available to a sponsor or advertiser is a total area of 75cm2 on the right hand side, from the perspective of the wearer, at the front.

The Socks

A Club may include one sponsor or advertiser on the socks. For the avoidance of doubt this is additional to the Club crest (maximum area 50 cm2) and the manufacturer’s identification (maximum area 20cm2). The space available to a sponsor or advertiser is a total area of 25cm2 on each sock. The same sponsor or advertiser must be used on both socks.

  • Author

A Club may also include a sponsor or advertiser on the front of the shirt. The space available to a sponsor or advertiser is a total area of 200cm2 on the front of the shirt, horizontally across the centre of the chest. Lettering used in this area must not exceed 10cm in height. No manufacturer identification, design or other elements may be incorporated in the lettering used.

Horizontally you say...

4809760130_cdb53d853a.jpg

Its horizontal when he is lying on the pitch.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. : Terms of Use : Guidelines : Privacy Policy