Skip to content

World Cup

Apologies for posting this in the main forum ...

Ryan Christie, Ryan Christie, Ryan Christie ... there we go, now its ICT related πŸ˜„

Do users want a separate sub forum for the World Cup (and by extension the Euros in a couple of years time hopefully) or should we simply stick with the "Other Football" category? A separate forum would allow us to keep it all in place and not get lost with other stuff, keeping it in the general football category could also be done if we just prefix every world cup thread with a tag of "world cup".

I am not bothered either way as neither is a huge task.

  • Replies 66
  • Views 9.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • culduthel
    culduthel

    Am I the only one thinking that the visual of the USA supporters in the stadium at their game looks like a "Where's Wally" puzzle !

  • luddite
    luddite

    Are they in a studio in blighty? If not how the f*** did he manage to get in with his record?

  • bishbashbosh
    bishbashbosh

    Sorry, its just me. I have no intention of watching Scotland games therefore can’t possibly chat about them.( might have a look in now and again see what you are all saying though πŸ˜€) This sums up Scot

World Cup Forum or not? 9 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you want a separate World Cup subforum?

    • Yes - that would be handy
      55%
      5
    • No - we can make do with the general football forum
      44%
      4

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

I’m sure I wasn’t the only one to be delighted at only being 1-0 down at HT! Looked somewhat out of our depth initially, but had a much better 2nd half and competed well. I fear only scoring 1 v Haiti will be our downfall in terms of qualifying, but you never know.

  • Author

Man - what a shitty ref! 2 penalty claims that could and perhaps should have been given and a clear last man challenge early on. Seemed to let a lot go but then not consistent. Definitely favoured Morocco. VAR ref I notices was also one of the worst refs in MLS so I knew we would get no benefit or consistency there either.

On the plus side, Gannon-Doak was good when he came on and I thought Christie also had a good game. Might have preferred Shankland to Dykes.

Definitely robbed of at one pen. Never really in the game until the last 20 mins or so. Hopefully you'll get an unlikely point against Brazil who seem to be turning on the style right now...even it was Haiti.

  • Author

As it stands right now, 3 points might be enough. There's a spreadsheet someone created that works it all out in real-time.
https://hermann-baum.de/excel/WorldCup/en/

Scotland sitting 2nd in the 3rd place team table after last night's results. Calculations show a predicted last 32 game against Germany in Boston although results in all the other games will likely change that situation.

As one of the sides to play their 3rd game early, Scotland are at a bit of a disadvantage. Teams in the later stages will have a better idea of what is needed to get through. For instance, a team playing later on having, like Scotland, won one and lost one, might see that some teams finishing 3rd had less than 3 points and will know the goal difference of those finishing with 3 points. They will know whether they need to get at least a draw or whether a 1 or 2 goal defeat would still see them through. Scotland won't have that luxury. If they concede to Brazil, they will be in a dilemma of whether or not they push hard for an equaliser at the risk of conceding again and making their goal difference worse.

What a shambles up to half time.

Why the *%(Β£ are we playing the ball back and across our own box constantly.

It's an absolute horror show.

Sadly outclassed tonight, and how the BBC commentator thinks we still have a chance of qualifying, goodness knows.

We can’t gift rap goals like we did on Friday and tonight.

If Scotland was a dog you would have it put down to end its suffering.

Please god don't let us proceed any further in this competition with this farce of a team.

1 hour ago, Yngwie said:

Plenty of effort but not enough quality and too many mistakes.

I think that just about summed it up. Scotland certianly gave it more apparent effort than England did on Tuesday night, but then I suppose Brazil didn't just park the bus.

I do hope that the other results mean Scotland can get through. It's still eminently possible, but equally results could go the wrong way (who'd have thought South Africa would beat South Korea) and there are too many variables to predict at the moment.

It is absurd that Scotland might not know whether they are through or not until the early hours of Sunday morning when Austria and Algeria will play, knowing that a tame draw will see them both safely through. Meanwhile, the team will have to train assuming that they will qualify whilst fans continue to pay money hand over fist to continue staying in the USA in order to support their team in the event of results going their way.

I think Scotland will go through. Four of the teams above them still have games to play and could drop below them with defeats, although probably by a couple of goals or more. And realistically, I can only see Belgium and Congo moving above them. In Belgium's group, if they beat New Zealand and Egypt beat Iran, then Iran would go 3rd with just 2 points.

It looks like a nervy 3 days.

  • Author
1 hour ago, Yngwie said:

One of several disappointing aspects of this tournament is that our (supposed) big name stars simply did not shine. Perhaps the only player whose stock went up is Lewis Ferguson who was consistently impressive.

I would add Gannon-Doak to that list. Always looked lively.

What's disappointing is that you see Curacao, Cabo Verde, or Haiti, or Panama or other teams fancied to finish 4th and they are clearly putting 100% effort into everything and leaving nothing on the pitch at the end. We, by comparison, looked lethargic in all our games. I am sure they are not, but too many players looked disinterested out there.

If we scrape in, we look to be playing Mexico (currently) but let's be honest, we don't deserve to scrape in.

The big winners here seem to be the Tartan Army who have really been the story more so than the team.

The big winners here seem to be the Tartan Army who have really been the story more so than the team. It looks, for all intended purposes the tartan army has supplanted the Scottish football team as the main feature of any tournament the team manages to qualify for. ie A friendly, colourful, noisy engaging mass of people that party on the whole with the residents of the city or area they base themselves. They have become an extension of presenting our country much better than any political office.

I did not watch any our the Scottish matches, primarily due to the time they were televised. That said my views on our nation football team, manager and those running our game have been mostly critical as we continue to fail that great support. The SFA appears incapable of having the whereabouts to address the malaise and slow decline that afflicts our game. Maybe I (we) have to accept we are unable to copy equivalent second tier European countries in raising the standard and quality of our national team performance?

We may scrape through by some mathematical formula having dispatched the mighty Haiti, but it would be a hollow success in my mind. We would most certainly loose (possibly badly) against strong opponents.

It would also just plaster over the shortcomings in our game IMO and allow the SFA blazers off the hook, ie they would claim it as some sort of improvement by the first qualifying national team (even though it is easier), and simply continue the status quo.

I do feel for all the small children, mums and youngsters that dressed up sporting the Scottish strip and other garb. Certainly they and the Nation got full behind the team. The tartan army turned out in strength and for the most enjoyed the occasion and presented our nation and people in its best light.

I just wish our team could have given them more to recognise the super level of support they had.

Maybe next time.

bc

Edited by big cherly

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 1

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. : Terms of Use : Guidelines : Privacy Policy

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions β†’ Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.