It's that time of year again, nearly half way through the season. Things are not going our way and the vultures are coming out.

I have noticed that there are some posters, who at the beginning of the season called for calm and time, are now becoming more vocal towards a shift in the personnel running our club. A video was posted by one member comparing a certain person to the worst dictator in human history, surely a breach of site rules.

Instead of all the small digs, and seeding of discontent, could I challenge all of those who feel a change in club management is required to post their thoughts here.

IHE is probably the only member of this site who comes out directly, without all the wee backstabbing digs or unwillingness to quantify his claims, to explain his thoughts.

I may be wrong, I may have missed your (any anti board campaigners) posts, but if you really do feel strongly that you need to convince us you could stop hiding your thoughts in other threads and post here, you could stop hiding behind second accounts and posting videos which are defamatory.

Personally I am not happy with what is happening at our club, I don't want to be supporting a mid table first division side but I can't really see any alternative to what we have, maybe you could point me in the right direction. I think if we end up having a sack the board campaign it will damage ICT more than the fiasco when the Trust delayed Brewster's sacking by flexing their muscles.

Convince me with rhetoric and not mind games, please.

Edited December 7, 200916 yr by Revbirdog

Don't forget the club received almost 500k Euros for him from Dinamo and almost 50k Euros for him taking part in the Euro's also not a bad years work

:D la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la

Is this case really about the money or is it a personality thing with a major shareholder? Can't help feeling this should have never been an issue in the first place.

Don't forget the club received almost 500k Euros for him from Dinamo and almost 50k Euros for him taking part in the Euro's also not a bad years work

:D la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la

Is this case really about the money or is it a personality thing with a major shareholder? Can't help feeling this should have never been an issue in the first place.

Sorry really don't understand what you are getting at with personality thing with a major shareholder

Edited December 8, 200916 yr by stevico1

If the man who reportedly recruited Marius been part of the decision to "let him go", I doubt that this fees mess would have happened.

It did happen so I blame the man who carried the DVD into TCS. :D

If the man who reportedly recruited Marius been part of the decision to "let him go", I doubt that this fees mess would have happened.

Yes I agree with that I am certain a compromise would have been reached between both parties if that had been the case.

It did happen so I blame the man who carried the DVD into TCS. B)

Cheers :D

Edited December 8, 200916 yr by stevico1

If the man who reportedly recruited Marius been part of the decision to "let him go", I doubt that this fees mess would have happened.

Yes I agree with that I am certain a compromise would have been reached between both parties if that had been the case.

It did happen so I blame the man who carried the DVD into TCS. :P

Cheers :023:

Wind-up, Stevico. Don't bite.

One says this and one says that...Meanwhile the folk who know the truth keep schtum while we bicker like rats.

The whole issue with signing Marius needs to be properly looked into. There's something not right about the way the transfer was conducted, from Savage allegedly buying shares in the club to fund the wages, to the fact that David Sutherland appeared in the press claiming we couldn't pay his wages to the fact that the board seemed to hawk him around club after club in a desperate attempt to sell him to the fact that we apparently have withheld payments to Marius that he is legally entitled to.

The entire affair is a shambles and isn't the way to run a club. To be honest, I feel sorry for Marius in the whole thing - he appears to have been royally messed around. Imagine turning on the news and hearing that your employer has been telling the media that he is unable to pay your wages; it's unacceptable.

Agree 100%, if there was no money for Marius' wage then where did the cash appear from for Barrowman?

pissup, brewery, etc., etc.

for those who cant work in euros (like me) €242,500.00 = ?211,918.81

I don't have the figures to hand but the 242,500.00 Euros would have been a heck of a lot less than ?211,918.81 if paid at the time of his transfer

Around ?165-170k I think - basically ?40k less...

for those who cant work in euros (like me) €242,500.00 = ?211,918.81

I don't have the figures to hand but the 242,500.00 Euros would have been a heck of a lot less than ?211,918.81 if paid at the time of his transfer

Around ?165-170k I think - basically ?40k less...

Maybe we're stalling until the ? rallies against the €

I always knew the board were a load of Merchant Bankers

Edited December 9, 200916 yr by HawkeyeTheGnu

Thank feck that Drachmas and Roubles werent still around !!

Sorry really don't understand what you are getting at with personality thing with a major shareholder

Our major shareholder has a personality? :D

If this is proved to be the case then it's a great pity it's a personality he has and not a bloody interest in football :(

Edited December 10, 200916 yr by Jay_7