Leaderboard

No Preview required Happy Days Changed my mind. Here's the Preview. The game is off!

Following our Board Meeting on Tuesday, our members have been sent this update by e-mail today: ICT Supporters Trust: Update to Members If any member has not received it, please let us know by contacting us at [email protected]. If anyone is able to volunteer to assist in Bar 94 on occasions, please let us know. We are grateful to all our members for their continued support, and we would welcome new members. Joining is easy (and only £5 for adults and £1 for under 16s). Just follow this link: https://www.ictsupporterstrust.org/join-us

I'm confident there will be life after administration, and what it will look like has very little to do with the current public perceived car park scenario. As I said before, I'm not hopeful that we'll get to a point of agreeing a CVA with creditors, regardless of the car park situation, because there's still the hurdle of shareholding/control for any new investor. We're being fed the line that the car parks need to go back to the club to improve the likelihood of a sale, but if liquidation is the more likely scenario then it all being under one company (the club) increases the likelihood of a buyer with more interest in developing the area than developing the club being interested. RM and DC have already said they would be willing to do a deal with/speak to any new/potential owner or investor, so it's not really an obstacle to a sale in terms of cost to them, it just means less money to the club and less for creditors (and who are the main creditors?) from CVA/Liquidation. It does also mean that they (RM & DC) are not hindered by having to accept the highest bid and could (maybe) ensure the lease doesn't end up in the hands of someone not interested in the club. Is it possible they're all just being cnuts and looking out for themselves? Yes. However, there is also a possibility that they are also looking to try and protect the clubs future. Just because they may be at odds with the way AS is doing things doesn't make them the bad guys...and vice versa. Knowing all parties involved, I don't believe any of them want to screw over the club, but as has been the frustration since the club came into being (and before), we would be so much better off if they could find a way to work together.

Who did RM appoint as CEO and still defends him? Who did RM try to sell the club to, then reintroduce once in administration? I still hope that they might be easy to deal with, but I also hope they have zero say on how, as RM would have it, Inverness Kelty is run. They messed up. They racked up the huge debt. Profiting on the back of this is not being a supporter. They need to do the decent thing and pay for their own failings.

Game now scheduled for 18th January. Moved forward one week, hope the thaw thtarts thoon... Annan bus 18th leaves stadium 8.30. Picking up in Aviemore and Pitlochry. £20 a seat. Book through Facebook or on 07462218717

The game on 15 February is now a 1400 kick off as the 30th anniversary dinner dance is that evening.

Nobody's mentioned the Clach park, with a capacity of 3000 or so. Could a groundshare deal be done between Highland League and Scottish League that would be mutually beneficial to both clubs? Certainly more accessible to many by foot than some others being mentioned.