I think that's a little unfair Alex, and not entirely accurate. Yes, a couple of site users tired to use it as a "Stewards/Club are being heavy handed" line, but the majority of people who commented agreed that the lad was in the wrong and should face punishment. Discussion then went on to the punishment fitting the crime and in that regard the scenarios are very different.
If we lived in a world of Black and White, then yes, I would agree that both should expect the same treatment, but we don't....
- The ICT Fan didn't technically enter the field of play, he crossed the wall but never went on to the pitch, the Celtic Fan did.
- The ICT Fan did not approach any opposition players, the Celtic Fan did.
- The ICT Fan never laid hands on anyone, the Celtic Fan did.
For the record, I don't think the Celtic boy deserves a lifetime ban..a year or two maybe, but not life. We've all done things in life which we later regretted and would not repeat and I don't see why the law (and subsequent punishments) inside a football ground should be any different than that outside it.
The ICT Fan the other week deserves some kind of ban/punishment, but I don't believe his actions were in any way as serious so perhaps 6 to 12 months would be appropriate, not to forget the fact that such action can also lead to charges of Breach of the Peace so he may/may not have that to deal with as well.