Why would Savage want to win our support? He is history and doesn't need support from anywhere. This is all a personal battle between Sutherland and Savage and as I have said previously, this is not the first battle Sutherland has fought and won (remember Doug McGillvray). Sutherland, by his own admission is very democratic but only if you agree with him.
So long as Orion Group hold 12% of ICT then Savage is not history.
Perhaps I'm just a very cynical person, it comes from years of seeing power struggles and takeovers in business. and the effect that has on people, but Orion have a 12% stake in the company. They could increase that with the right offer to the right people. Collectively there's between 10 and 15% of stock held in small amounts by a fairly large number of fans. I believe that around 43% is held in some form by the Sutherland empire, either in personal stock or held through various companies, so there is a majority holding possible.
After all that has happened, if you can't see that Savage is history then continue to live in your little dream world of business power struggles and takeovers. Remember Ian Fraser, the man who put the money in at the birth of the club - not Sutherland as per yesterday's P&J. Sutherland made life so horrible for him he eventually sold his shares to Sandy Catto. You must also remember that the sale or transfer of shares needs the approval of the board so Savage has absolutely no chance of increasing his holding as Sutherland now has an even stronger say on the board. As much as Sutherland is applauded my many, if you don't live by his word - forget it.