Haven't seen anything on here about the ongoing turmoil in the SFL. Eight of the ten First Division clubs have held a meeting discussing their options for a breakaway league, perhaps aligning itself to the SPL in a SPL2 development. The SFL has no sponsor, no television coverage and the First Division next season only contains one club with a 'significant' travellling support (Partick Thistle). Our chairman has spoken on the issue, offering his support to the idea of an SPL2 for full time clubs outside the SPL.
Here is the story from today's Daily Record:
EXCLUSIVE: SFL REBELS IN BREAKAWAY
Exclusive
By Hugh Keevins
FIRST DIVISION clubs were last night on the brink of revolt with a plan to break away from the SFL and form a new competition called the Scottish Championship.
A proposal has been drafted and will be put before clubs at a meeting on Friday. Those who vote in favour will formally present their notice to quit the Scottish League.
Clubs who decide not to go with the breakaway movement will be left behind and their places will be offered to Second Division clubs until a group of 12 is formed.
A two-year period of notice to quit the SFL is in their constitution but this will be ignored and a legal battle will be mounted if necessary to bring about the new set-up in time for the start of next season.
Consultation will also take place with the Premier League board to seek their backing for what will effectively be an SPL 2.
It is intended to have the names and aims of the Scottish Championship in place before he SPL's strategy meeting in June and in time for consideration at the SFL agm in the close season.
The SFL, led by president John Smith of Stirling Albion, are sure to resist the idea of revolution and a legal fight could be set in motion.
But a meeting of the dissident clubs will take place at Clyde's ground on Friday to draw up battle lines.
The SFL has lost Bell's, its sponsor, and there is growing concern that unless something radical is done to address financial worries some clubs will face the prospect of going under.
It is the biggest crisis football has faced since the SPL was brought into being in 1995 but the ultimatum from the First Division is on its way.
Pearse Flynn, owner of Livingston, who have just dropped out of the SPL, said: "Clubs involved in this movement are passionate about the need to help themselves.
"I've discovered that the difference in earnings made by the top team in the league and East Stirling, the bottom club in the Third Division, was just £15,000 in the year gone by.
"It isn't good enough and the clubs that formed the idea of the Scottish Championship can't wait to fulfil a two-year notice period to quit.
"We need to do something now."
The SFL will shortly lose commercial wizard Bill Wilson due to retirement and the running of that department will be left in less experienced hands.
This has helped prompt the idea that a breakaway is the only answer to protect clubs who want to hold on to full-time football.
Lex Gold, SPL chief executive, has held informal talks with worried clubs but told them to discuss their plan with the SFL before getting back to him.
Now the interested parties have taken the first step towards forming an organisation beneath the SPL that will be attractive to sponsors and TV.
Friday's vote will test the resolve of the clubs involved in the battle for their own survival. Eight have already given assurances they will do whatever is necessary to move forward.
The rest now know that if they resist they will be left in limbo.
It seems that the 'big' clubs of the SFL see themselves as being held back by the 'smaller' clubs and think they can attract sponsors, TV deals etc better on their own. They would also be able to keep the profits of these deals for themselves rather than share it with the other sides.
I think that creating more division and governing bodies in football is wrong. If these so-called big clubs were offering a superior product then sponsorship woudl be forthcoming, but it isn't.
Haven't seen anything on here about the ongoing turmoil in the SFL. Eight of the ten First Division clubs have held a meeting discussing their options for a breakaway league, perhaps aligning itself to the SPL in a SPL2 development. The SFL has no sponsor, no television coverage and the First Division next season only contains one club with a 'significant' travellling support (Partick Thistle). Our chairman has spoken on the issue, offering his support to the idea of an SPL2 for full time clubs outside the SPL.
Here is the story from today's Daily Record:
It seems that the 'big' clubs of the SFL see themselves as being held back by the 'smaller' clubs and think they can attract sponsors, TV deals etc better on their own. They would also be able to keep the profits of these deals for themselves rather than share it with the other sides.
I think that creating more division and governing bodies in football is wrong. If these so-called big clubs were offering a superior product then sponsorship woudl be forthcoming, but it isn't.