Jump to content
  • Signup for more content

    Our main forums are visible to guests along with a few other features. Login to access more content.

  • tm4tj
    tm4tj

    Season Tickets + Resignation Confirmation

     

    The Board of Directors at ICT would like to thank the fans for their patience at this difficult time :hiding02:

     

    Copy-of-Copy-of-Colorful-Student-CampaigFirstly we can confirm the resignation of our Chairman and Board member Ross Morrison. He leaves with our sincere thanks for the dedicated service he has given to the Club and we are indebted to him for his passion, tireless effort and crucial investment in the Club.

    We can also announce that our CEO Scot Gardiner has tendered his resignation, which has been accepted by the Board. Scot is now serving his notice and will be continuing to help the Club get through this difficult period.

     

    FULL STATEMENT CLICK HERE




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    29 minutes ago, Jack Waddington said:

    *Physical for a fiver extra

    That's only for new season ticket holders. No charge for people renewing as last years ticket uploaded for this season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, Starscape said:

    How much money has SG brought in? Which schemes have worked? Has he paid for his own salary?

    Genuine question.

    Nothing I can think of. No project he's been involved with has been successful that I can recall and by virtually any metric things have deteriorated on and off the pitch over his tenure. Has anything improved since he arrived? Nothing except his business' bank balance and his ego. 

    Of course, it's not only Gardiner's incompetence in the mix, others have contributed. 

    • Agree 3
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Approaching Duncan Ferguson, who had just five months of experience at Forest Green Rovers as a full-time manager, and in those months saw him manage 18 games with only a single win and 3 draws, and leaving in July 2023 was incredibly suspect.  

    Giving him a three-year contract in Sep 2023, for a reported £5,000 - £7,000 a week according to The Times Newspaper, shows how much blatant disregard the board and CEO had/have for ICT.

    The other many failed ventures were rank incompetence and hubris, but the appointment of Ferguson stands out as an appalling act.

    Gambler has not made the club money, it is quite the opposite!

    • Like 1
    • Agree 3
    • Well Said 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Starscape said:

    How much money has SG brought in? Which schemes have worked? Has he paid for his own salary?

    Genuine question.

    Things he could put on his CV.

    - significant cost cutting when he first came in

    - £3.4m income from battery farm project which was initially approved by planning but overturned by unusual manoeuvres by the council, but which may still get approved on appeal

    - 99% of our interest in the battery farm was apparently then sold for £250,000 - this generating more cash than a year’s worth of season tickets?

    - 2 sell out concerts in 2020 would have been very profitable but then Covid hit. That was unlucky.

    - further attempt at concerts actually made an unspecified but significant amount money for the club from stadium rental and provision of other services to the concert co

    Obviously he wouldn’t mention the negative aspects of these things!

    Edited by Yngwie
    • Thoughtful 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    18 minutes ago, Fraz said:

    No changes until he gets a proper look at the situation does make sense I think. 

     

    Back in Europe in 5 years though 👏

    This is more concerning to me, the guy clearly doesn’t really understand

    • Funny 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, Fraz said:

    Might it not be better if he retained statements like this until after he produces confirmation that he is the legal owner of the 50.48% of the shares that he has pledged to acquire?

    Edited by Charles Bannerman
    • Like 1
    • Well Said 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, Fraz said:

    No changes any time soon according to the prospective new boss. 

    Well, no changes before the deal completes. And then he needs to speak to everyone at the club and work out what’s working and what’s not. That might not take long!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    49 minutes ago, Charles Bannerman said:

    Might it not be better if he retained statements like this until after he produces confirmation that he is the legal owner of the 50.48% of the shares that he has pledged to acquire?

    I chanced across something today that he wrote about a Yeading and Hayes match.  It was "we" this and "we" that, written as though he was the owner. 

    And we all know how that turned out.

    • Thoughtful 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Charles Bannerman said:

    Might it not be better if he retained statements like this until after he produces confirmation that he is the legal owner of the 50.48% of the shares that he has pledged to acquire?

    Yes, but we’ve had so many moaning on here for him to come out and talk.

    • Like 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, ICTPaisley said:

    Yes, but we’ve had so many moaning on here for him to come out and talk.

    Agreed absolutely, and I see what you are saying but, given the scepticism he has created, I would be more comfortable if what he said was based more on providing reassurance and (within the constraints of commercial confidentiality) information about his bid.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 minutes ago, Charles Bannerman said:

     given the scepticism he has created

    He hasn’t created scepticism, people have just chosen to be sceptical! He has done nothing wrong.

    • Agree 1
    • Funny 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    37 minutes ago, Yngwie said:

    He hasn’t created scepticism, people have just chosen to be sceptical! He has done nothing wrong.

    I can’t quite agree there. I think that a guy with his “credentials”, which haven’t been difficult to establish, automatically creates scepticism by even embarking on a project like this, and the manner of some of the statements he has already made have only added to that scope for scepticism.

    That said, the way the club has gone about its business of late has created such a lack of public confidence in it that any agreement it came to short of a large, gold plated financial gift would be treated with some degree of scepticism. This latter consideration isn’t, however, created directly by Mr Makwana.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    51 minutes ago, Yngwie said:

    He has done nothing wrong.

    So even if he can't say how much money he will be investing, or where it's coming from - which doesn't instil confidence - surely he can tell us about the other phenomenal developments which (he says) he has been involved in?

    From the viewpoint of the ordinary fan, I'd say that he has done nothing right either.

    And that's basically what the Companies House records for all his companies suggest.  Nothing really wrong, but nothing right either.

    An enigma.

    • Agree 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, Yngwie said:

    He hasn’t created scepticism, people have just chosen to be sceptical! He has done nothing wrong.

    People are sceptical because nobody, least of all Makwana himself, have come up with any information which suggests he is remotely capable of funding this deal or running a football club.  He seems to be basically a one man band.  

    The latest accounts filed with Companies House record Seventy7 Ventures as having an average of just 1 employee - presumably himself.  His longer established business of Enterprise Lab Ltd is listed as having 2 employees with him, as the sole director presumably being one of them.  So, he probably has someone who gives a bit of admin support and that is his business empire!

    His businesses all seem to be related to business consultancy, a subject on which he appears to have minimal experience or qualification to provide advice on.  On an admittedly brief Google search, I could find no record of him having been in a senior management role in a company.  His consultancy work seemed to focus on making videos or participating in conferences in ofter obscure places such as Albania.  It would appear that having made a presentation at a conference, he then claims to have provided consultancy services to all the companies that had a member of staff attend.

    I don't doubt that he has a fair bit of knowledge around business management theory and, in particular, related to change management, but it comes across as more of a hobby than something he has a record of successful delivery in.  Has he actually worked with companies on detailed projects of change management and documented how he produced positive change?  If he has, I didn't find any evidence of it.  If anybody has found any evidence that there is any substance behind the change management buzzwords, please share.

     

    • Agree 3
    • Well Said 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    11 hours ago, Yngwie said:

    - 2 sell out concerts in 2020 would have been very profitable but then Covid hit. That was unlucky.

    It could be argued that he was lucky Covid reduced the sale of tickets.  There was a total lack of communication between those running the concerts and those delivering them.  It was only after tickets were sold that the Concert Company and the Club realised the size of the stage that would be used.  As a result, people who were sat in the 2 most westerly sections in both the North and South stands had to be allocated new seats because otherwise they would have seen nothing of the performers.  I believe folk affected were only informed of this when they arrived at the stadium.  As it was, folk in the middle of the 2 stands only got a partial view of the stage and numerous people wrote to complain and seek a refund because of the restricted view. (They got no reply).  In addition, such was the height of the stage that those in premium seats at the front also had a very restricted view.  Many moved back to cheaper seats to get a better view.

    What would have happened had the concerts been sold out doesn't bear thinking about.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. : Terms of Use : Guidelines : Privacy Policy