What was incorrect about saying a fee had been agreed with C*unty and they hoped to have it cleared up by the end of the week?
Under the current conditions, where a player has more than 6 months remaining on a contract the club have to get permission to talk to a player, if a club says a fee has to be agreed first, then thats the way it is, whether we like it or not.
Grassa has said that our basic wage is among the lowest, but bonuses more than make up the gap with many teams. I am perfectly aware of the level of wages our players are on (with and without bonus).
OK, so we plough more money in to Youth, where does it come from? Player budget, which means an inferior team on the pitch (on lower wages than they are already on) - result = relegation = even less money. We only have X amount of money to spend, and the books have to be balanced, we can't have everything and concessions need to be made somewhere. I wouldn't argue that our Youth Development is underfunded, I just don't see where we could realistically where (from within the club) we have capacity to raise that funding. I personally know people who regularly dip in their pocket to give 10's of thousands to youth development at ICT, and will continue to do so for as long as it is needed, so I am aware of how things are.
My comment about 11 "wet behind the ears" players was an indication of where we would end up if we took money from player budget to fund Youth Coaching, as that would be where we would have to draw our team from cause we wouldn't be able to afford anything else.