January 18, 200917 yr Has there been any response from the board yet following the meeting of 7th January as to the concerns of the trust ?? If I remember correctly there was a timescale applied..........
January 18, 200917 yr Dear Supporters Trust, Get to feck ya moaning bestards - all feckin 20 of ya. Ya should be happy that we have a team in the SPL. Ya should be happy that a team with our budget has been in the SPL fer so long. We were a Highland League outfit only a few years ago - have you all feckin forgotten ? Just you keep on paying the entrance fees and leave the business and football side to us - We are backing our current manager to get us out of this temporary lull - Absolutely. Yours Mickey Mouse Sutherland
January 18, 200917 yr They stated clearly in yesterdays Daily Mail that they would not be responding to the trust. Grassa said he was too busy recruiting new players and anyway he could get more of a feel for the fans perspective in his regular visits to the social club. Sutherland told the supporters to live up to their name and stick to supporting the "on the field" It was down in black and white along with the other disgusting viewpoints.
January 18, 200917 yr Well done. The Trust are definitely not helping in our current situation and needed to be put in their place with their ridiculous notion of "deadline". :
January 18, 200917 yr Since the art of communication has never been your strong point I can forgive you - but why - if the Board feel that way about the Trust - do they have to rubbish and decry them otherwise. I agree that the notion of a "deadline" is ridiculous but if this club was communicating properly this would have been an open and prompt discussion. The Trust are basically figureheads who convey the concerns of their membership - The non - response is another PR disaster as they just continue to make the divide wider and wider.
January 18, 200917 yr I totally agree with The Immortal Howden Ender because if they were not as arrogant and communicated well with the support there would be no mention of DEADLINES and the board would not be hiding behind "private" comments in the national press. They should come clean and tell us in detail how they are going to deal with this turmoil and the incompetent manager. They should tell us why they have LED us to be the worst team in the division. If they can find the time to criticise the support at length in the Daily Mail then they should have time to speak top the support. THEY ARE HIDING AND THEY KNOW WHY THEY ARE HIDING. THEY ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM BUT NOT PART OF THE SOLUTION.
January 18, 200917 yr As far as the management of the team I think they have already answered that, they said Brewster would be getting funds to strenghten the team and in effect they are happy with his management of the team
January 18, 200917 yr Well done. The Trust are definitely not helping in our current situation and needed to be put in their place with their ridiculous notion of "deadline". : Unlike you most of the trust don't have their heads in the sand regarding the current state of affairs and simply want to know what is being done about it.
January 18, 200917 yr Well done. The Trust are definitely not helping in our current situation and needed to be put in their place with their ridiculous notion of "deadline". : Better to keep your mouth shut and for others to think you are an idiot, than to open your mouth and confirm it!
January 19, 200917 yr For the ICT board to not even acknowledge a request from one of its biggest shareholders is arrogance beyond belief.
January 19, 200917 yr Lest we not forget that this was not all about Craig Brewster - there were more to blame than him - some may think that scapegoating is their smokescreen - GTF.
January 19, 200917 yr Lest we not forget that this was not all about Craig Brewster - there were more to blame than him - some may think that scapegoating is their smokescreen - GTF. words of sense yet again o great oracle... :thumb04: :018:
January 19, 200917 yr Lest we not forget that this was not all about Craig Brewster - there were more to blame than him - some may think that scapegoating is their smokescreen - GTF. agreed.
Has there been any response from the board yet following the meeting of 7th January as to the concerns of the trust ?? If I remember correctly there was a timescale applied..........