Leaderboard

Very disappointed with Alex Salmond today courting the votes of the Unionists. He said that the most important thing here was the survival of Rangers football club. Wrong Alex! The most important thing is that the tax payer gets as much money possible out of the criminals who run that business.Whether or not Rangers' survival is good or bad for Scottish football is not the issue here. Those running the club, past and present have been deliberately withholding money from the taxpayer - money which could be used for a whole raft of essential public services which are being squeezed at the moment. Carer support for the elderly, books for school kids, repairing crumbling roads, investing in the NHS - you name a worthy use of public spending and Rangers football club is stopping it happening. It is extraordinary that there is a mindset in this country that almost accepts failure to pay tax as a bit of bad luck and those who fail to pay can negotiate with the authorities to agree to pay back whatever minimal amount of their debt they can get away with. They then start again buying into a debt free company owned by their mates who bought the assets at knockdown prices. They then find new ways in which to spend money they haven't got and steal more from the taxpayer. Every asset of the club should be sold and those responsible for the theft should have their personal assets including money hidden in other companies identified to pay back as much of the debt as possible. They should be allowed nowhere near a football club again.

For the supreme Caley away day buy a carry out on Friday night, stick it in the fridge, get the 0650 train South, start drinking at 0651, find the roughest boozer in town that will beopen when you arrive circa 10am and enjoy the carnage.

We do actually have one of the better youth set-ups, run by one of the better groups of youth coaches in the league. It must be very frustrating for our coaches when they have to oversea the release of players because we simply cant afford to keep them all. We cant pay a full U-19 squad so we try and supplement them with younger players who are mere schoolkids. DD had a valid question and Oddquine answered as she sees things. DD's points were also very valid as he see's them. CD chips in with more very valid points. We can all put our tuppenceworth in based on what we know and see and none of us are wrong. I do support the point that if there was more information available regarding how things are with the youth and U-19 setups there would be little need to enter into this type of debate. The bottom line in all this is that if we want to stay in this league in the current economic climate we need to make sacrifices.

There are a lot of good points in what you say CD. I have'nt been an ST holder before due to work but, because I retire this year, I will likely go for one next season and I'd happily suffer the weather to stand in that area. I also think that a noisey north wing could generate a better atmosphere around the rest of the stadium. It may well be that many people who can afford a North stand ST cannot afford to go the bit extra to help fund this, and many others who cant justify a ST against the number of games they can attend, so I'd be inclined to suggest that, if the club agree in principle, we have some fund raising events, perhaps organised through the Supporters Trust and Club. Could we fund and fill two hundred seats in this area? I'd also suggest that, as a trade off for the funds raised, the club give the fans the wall that traverses the area for flags and banners. A red and blue brigade area to rival the evil twins as it were.

BBC Sportsound have just read out the number of employees that Rangers have. Huge numbers of folk are going to lose their jobs through no fault of their own. 20 people work in the ticket office alone. No matter how you feel about this youve gotta feel sorry for a lot of people.

If the game has yet to take place, and Rangers (or the administrators) cannot give assurances that the receipts for sales for this future fixture will be paid for then I say we should declare all tickets for the south stand void, reprint them on bright green paper (perhaps with white stripes) and sell them ourselves (or via the Portland Club) .... anyone turning up with original tickets gets turned away. simple. (in theory at least) the ticket money is not Rangers' money, it is ICT money which I think Rangers take a commission from for selling them, and which Rangers (and Celtic) requested to sell so they could control who got them amongst their support. If they are not going to pay for them, then the tickets are as good as frauds or forgeries and should be treated as such ....

My heart gave a little leap of joy every time I saw that blond haired guy greetin.I don't buy the "too big to die" argument. Dinosaurs did, and the planet adapted admirably. They are an institution only in the number of lunatics that are gathered around there right now, and deserve no intervention from the rest of us. I think that Rangers are in grave, grave danger of unravelling completely as liquidation stares them in the face. If HMRC are pursuing only what liabilities have been racked up since Whyte took over and that has led them to be unable to pay their way, people are going to be very interested in what happened to the dosh he got for selling the catering rights, what he got for Jellyfish and the unpaid PAYE for the year. What's he done with it? Given that this debacle has tarnished his reputation beyond any repair will he actually care about the aftermath or simply sit back and trouser any reasonable offer that comes for Castle Greyskull (presuming that point 1 (above) doesn't constitute illegality)You never know, it might pay for his roof.

Rory McAllister an og last night, one of three conceded by Peterhead in a 6-1 thrashing by Elgin

There were emotional scenes last night as hundreds of tearful fans held a candlelit vigil outside the home of Whitney Govan, the faded singer whose tragic demise was completed when she drowned in a bath of buckfast at the weekend. A brief announcement was made to Whitney’s mourners by Craig Shyte, the Chief Executive of her label Rangers Records, after which fans spontaneously burst into a chorus of her smash hit “I will always love to booooooo”. The singer’s rise to stadium filling stardom commenced in the 1980s, although she proudly traced her heritage as far back as 1690. After being mentored by the legendary entertainer Andy Cameron, her success seemed unstoppable, and she achieved a remarkable 9 number ones in a row. Whitney also picked up dozens of awards in her homeland, and even when the hits dried up, she continued to dominate at the MOPO awards (Music of Protestant Origin). Her huge and loyal fan base was drawn from all parts of society, from members of the royal family to sports journalists and football referees. Rangers Records are understood to be planning on cashing in on the wave of sympathy by re-releasing a compilation of the star’s greatest hits. 1. Didn’t we almost have it all? 2. I wanna dance with somebody (who has an unhealthy knowledge of Irish history) 3. Where do broken huns go? 4. How will I know (what to do with myself at weekends) Due to the unique sound and lyrics associated with Rangers Records, her particular brand of soul quickly became known as R-Soul. Live performances were renowned for the vocal backing of an enormous choir of R-Soul singers. At the height of her fame, in a move which wowed the world of showbiz, drama queen Whitney worked with one of Hollywood’s leading men, Kevin McCoistner and starred on the big screen. However, when the big screen stopped working, a riot broke out. McCoistner’s role in the movie was to protect the diva, with whom he became romantically involved, but on Saturday night there was nothing even he could do to save the star from herself. The fabulous wealth amassed by the glittering performer had been frittered away over the years on a succession of talentless session musicians, eventually leaving her unable to settle her tax bills. Craig Shyte had stepped in last year, promising to revive her career, but Whitney’s live performances deteriorated further and she ended up just another desperate crack whore controlled by a dubious pimp. Many distraught fans called yesterday for a commemorative statue to be placed in tribute at the site of the star’s home. But Rangers Records have indicated that the only lasting legacy they can afford is a bust. “Not just a little bust” a spokesman clarified, “a completely bust”.

A few users have changed names/opened new accounts over the years......some to get a "fresh start" after not starting off on the their best foot, some who were banned and now post under new identities thinking we don't know who they really are, some because they originally took usernames relating to past players/managers, some who were members of the media who's real identities were discovered etc etc

No...because it is not the employee who has broken the rules. It is the Contractor/Companies responsibility to deduct the relevant tax and pay HMRC. EBT's (Employee Benefits Trusts) work by "paying" an employee part of their salary by means of a loan. That loan is invested in a a Trust and all kinds of weird and wonderful conditions are attached to make it unlikely (although not impossible) that the loan will ever be recalled. Over and above this, employees are paid a basic wage and can borrow against the money they have invested in the Trust....the company then takes repayments for the second loan from the Trust which holds the proceeds of the first loan. By placing the Trust Offshore, they avoid payment of Income Tax & National Insurance on the EBT portion of their salary....although I believe some corporation tax liability exists on the part of the transaction done in the UK. The HMRC have disputed the legality of these schemes from the outset, rightfully claiming that they were "Disguised Remuneration", and anyone setting up such a scheme knew there was always a risk that they would be pursued for the tax that had been avoided. Legislation changed at the end of 2009 which put an end to such schemes one and for all and the pursuit of outstanding taxes begun. HMRC gave companies until December 2011 to sit down with them and agree settlement...they offered incentives for those willing to co-operate. From what I understand, Rangers FC refused that option and that is why they are now being pursued so vigorously. Why Rangers FC refused to co-operate and reach settlement is open to speculation, but I suspect it was in large part due to the fact that the moment they settled then money would be due....money which they do not have...and any repayment plan would have left Rangers owing money to HMRC and any club owing money to the Taxman is not allowed to participate in European Competitions.

Should've asked them for our share of ticket sales 3 years in advance.

Would like to see this: ---ESSON--- MEEKINGS---TOKELY---GILLET---SHINNIE ---FORAN---TANSEY--- HAYES---WINNAL---GNAKPA TADE But probably this: ---ESSON--- MEEKINGS---TOKELY---GILLET---SHINNIE FORAN---TANSEY HAYES---ROSS---SUTHERLAND ---TADE---

Sung to the tune of teddy bears picnic If you go down to ibrox today You're sure of a big surprise If you go down to ibrox today You'll never believe you're eyes Coz super ally has no cash And soon no place to sing the sash Today's the day the teddy bears have Their pitch nicked Dougal

Havent a feckin clue but I have ascertained how Terry picks the team.

Son of Rangers is no more 'outrageously unjust' that Son of Airdrie. Couldn't pay their debts. Slightly changed their name. Bought the licence out (from Clydebank) and continued playing. Can't see much of a difference there. Why is it one rule for one club and another for the rest? Indeed, if Rangers were treated like the rest of the SPL, instead of the one club (Gretna), they wouldn't even be docked any points. As for, the SPL would be more exciting coz Celtic wouldn't spend so much. As their finances decrease, so would the rest. They still have 5 to 10x the crowds of everyone else for a start, plus a worldwide following. In the face of a broke Rangers, a broke Hearts and no-one else investing, Celtic would expect Championships every season - just like Rangers did when they were the only ones spending. Scottish football has a bigger problem than Rangers going into administration. It needs root'n'branch work. A total redistribution of monies. I just can't see that happening. Despite all these tax and law experts in green telling us what administration means, I don't think any has a clue as to the machinations of why this is happening. I don't think it's anywhere as simple as 'Rangers have no money and Whyte doesn't know what he's doing'. I suspect he knows exactly where the club will be in 2 years time or so. However, I've no idea. But I'm pretty sure it won't be a league much different from what it is now. Unfortunately.

Maybe my hearing is going in my old age but I couldn't understand a frickin' word! When I was young (clap clap clap clap) I followed Ict (clap clap clap clap) ICTFC (clap clap clap clap) Is the team for me (clap clap clap clap) Doo doo doo doo ( jumping around optional) Thx for the translation, lol

Maybe my hearing is going in my old age but I couldn't understand a frickin' word! When I was young (clap clap clap clap) I followed Ict (clap clap clap clap) ICTFC (clap clap clap clap) Is the team for me (clap clap clap clap) Doo doo doo doo ( jumping around optional)