CaleyD

Boooooooooooooooooo

Hope so, but yet to have it confirmed.

^^^^^^ would be better off at Eden Court seeing Mother Goose than attending the footie I agree with Tokely the booing was a disgrace to be honest it was done by the minority but it was still hugely embarrassing, a guy that sweated blood over the years for this club should never have been disrespected in such a way and I would like to take this opportunity to appologise to him knowing that he will read this thread Dougal You'll be glad to hear....he wasn't boo'd by a minority today.

What's with all the PC "thou shall not boo an ex player" BS??? I really do worry about some of our fans....defending their right to boo own team one minute, then chastising fellow fans for booing an opponent the next!!! It's football, it's a bit of banter and no lines were crossed (as far as I heard and am concerned). Build a bridge and get over it.....just as Tokely did when he accepted our rivals money to turn out for them instead of us.

Three cheers for Leveson...got them scoundrels from the press running scared already!!!!

"Andy Murray" and "Personality" in the same sentence....you're having a giraffe!!!!

Rather amusing given his comments in The Sun about not getting caught up in the hype and concentrating on the game. Mind you, he'll probably be hoping the injuries situation doesn't improve and he actually gets a game!!!

Whether you agree with the whole Health and Safety thing or not....the fact is the ground has a safety certificate for a certain capacity and Elgin were seeking to exceed that without having it properly checked out or signed off as being fit to hold the additional capacity. The consequences of that, as has been seen all around the world over the years, could have been devastating. How did they plan to ensure that there was sufficient policing/stewarding etc if it was being surreptitiously? In saying that, I do think £25,000 for a club the size of Elgin is a bit steep....especially when faced with meeting the costs to Rangers (and I believe ESPN could still asks for costs also). The repercussions could effectively send a club like that to the wall. Far bigger clubs who've committed offences on a far bigger scale (fans causing riots at games etc) have received smaller fines....so there does seem to be a lack of parity in the level of the punishment. I just hope that whoever signed off on this has the decency to cover the cost and ensure the club don't lose out as a result of their stupidity.

AbraCaleyJagAdabra....that is all....!!!!

You can get MFR coverage on 1107am

That's assuming that it wasn't borrowed by another players Dad....thus not being driven by a Shinnie at all!!!

Cool...wonder who that is!!!

Booooooooooooooooooo

Think we need to add a "Where we work" section to profiles so we can all go round each others work and boo the feck out of people when they have a one off bad day.

If you want to listen to a decent commentary, then choose MFR....none of the snotty central belt bias you get from other commentators.

You missed the "and Friends"....we have it covered

Don't think you can put any definition on who is or is not a Legend. There will be a group of ex-players who everyone would happily attach the tag too, but probably just as many which some would think so and others not for a whole variety of reasons.

This is far from over....my thoughts on what may happen from here..... 1. HMRC will appeal. 2. Liquidators announce that if decision is upheld they will pursue those in receipt of "loans". 3. Those in receipt of "loans" think ...."sod this, I'm not coughing up"....and start to spill on the real nature of the payments. 4. FTT decision is overturned and HMRC get the outcome they want/need to now pursue others who've done the same. Make no mistake...this case was never about the HMRC getting any money from Rangers. There's far bigger fish they want to fry over the use of EBT's and Rangers is just the test case and will set the precedent.

All we have at the moment is speculation that two leagues of 12, then splitting into 3 of 8 is the plan being proposed/taken forward. The article clearly says that nobody at the meeting was willing to divulge any details. With that in mind, I'll not get too hot and bothered about it yet. All I will say is that if the SPL are not looking at a restructuring proposal that gets us away from this whole playing each other (up to) 4 times a season scenario, then they are about to get it horribly wrong.

Caley Jags Together are not "self acclaimed" in any way, shape or form. They are a group of fans...now numbering in excess of 300...with a democratically elected board. If you, or anyone else, is not satisfied with the work being done by those board members, then there's nothing whatsoever standing in the way of you coming forward and putting yourself up for election or volunteering your time to help. We haven't always got it right and we haven't always been able to achieve the things we would like...but we are at least trying. If some people put as much time and effort into helping as they put into coming on here criticising the efforts of others and making demands of them....then ICT would easily be able to achieve everything we want, and more. After all....it's not Rocket Science!!!!

Yesterdays attendance disappointed me just about as much as the result did.

You say in one breath that what players do in training doesn't count for anything....then in the next you make a case for a player who has yet to make his debut and who's performance you rank as being clearly better based on nothing more than what you have seen in what is effectively training games. How does that work?

Not ideal, but really not possible to have done anything else, IMO.

What's Gaelic for "Forever In Our Shadow"?