Yngwie

:029:

He has a touch of class but hasn't lived up to expectations or been value for money. But if we could generate a transfer fee in the summer, it could all have been worthwhile.

For the QoS fans, this season is one big "GIRUY" to their local rivals!

Would have been more of a surprise if it did mention any!

Not sure many Rangers fans would have been watching the rerun of the reserves game this evening! I've just watched it. The overall standard was lower than I expected, but the sodden pitch wouldn't have helped. The lad Ritchie Hart looked our best prospect. Rory was very poor :007:

Spotted a young man in an ICT top in Glenrothes this evening. It had "Bayne" and "9" on the back. Anyone here? Got me thinking, have you ever seen a stranger in an ICT top somewhere you wouldn't expect?

I would guess that for most unmarried Scottish footballers the most important things are : - money - being close to their mates neither of which makes it easy for ICT.

I think it was actually 731. The 0-0 result perhaps makes our win over Gretna seem a better result than many people thought.

I don't see how anyone can complain about a player being given a trial.

I've just checked the Rangers TV schedules (something I never thought I'd say!) and the reserves game is being shown on Thursday at 5.45 and again at 8.15. I think their production team need a couple of days to edit the footage to portray a 5-0 win for them.

I'm very surprised none of the conspiracy theorists have been along to suggest that this was a stunt set up by Savage to boost Niculae's image further. :017:

All very desirable, but expensive. Wouldn't we rather spend our limited resources on keeping our good players and attracting better ones?

I would certainly imagine that the first slice of any transfer fee goes to Orion to reimburse their contribution to his wages.

Didn't realise Bayne was injured, but the manager would have still played McAllister, Wilson, or Patti up front instead if, as some would have you believe, he was so spiteful and egotistical.

Today's result will not change anyone's opinion of him. I remain unconvinced that he has the tactical nous to be a long term success with us, but much of the ill-informed criticism of other aspects of his management has been hysterical. Time will tell that the difficult Black and Wyness situations in particular were handled a lot better than he is given credit for. Off the top of my head I can recall a few criticisms on this forum in recent weeks that back-up the "who'd be a manager" theme. - he brought McAllister on - he didn't bring McAllister on early enough - he didn't play Wyness (oh, and he's a liar because he said he'd give him a chance before the end of the season) - he did play Wyness! - he hasn't freshened things up enough and given fringe players their chance - he made too many changes for the Killie game - he should be playing Hart more - why's he playing Hart when he's leaving in the summer? - he doesn't give flare players a chance - why's he even looking at Juanjo? - he's too loyal to dead wood players - What does he think he's doing dropping a legend like Wilson/Wyness/other player well past his best? - he should have informed us promptly what happened with Wyness/Black - he shouldn't be commenting publicly on dressing room matters I smile when I see posters stating confidently that they could do a better job. Stick to Football Manager! There's not a single poster on this site who could do a better job, despite what some of them confidently believe. Our fans have been spoiled with relative success for 14 years and we will have to learn to cope with bad spells a bit more rationally than we have done.

A swollen paypacket.

IMO that's the most credible version of events we've had so far, and if true confirms that Black's temporary exile was good man management by Brewster.

They might not play attractive football, but their worst result since they went into administration is 0-3. And you have to go back to October to find them losing by 4.

WTF is QFT?!

Which is less appealing to you? 1) End of season league games where there is nothing significant to play for (the battle for 9th - woo hoo!) 2) Pre-season friendlies. Uncompetitive kickarounds, but a chance to see how the team is shaping up for the new season. For me, competition, tension and entertainment are the key ingredients of football, and it's hard to be interested when you know that at least 2 of the 3 will be missing.

First win bonus for a long time should help!

Will be interesting to hear from anyone there how we played. From the radio I couldn't really gauge if we were playing well and just not converting chances, or if we were poor against an even worse team.

You are absolutely right.

Sighs of relief all round.

We achieved that, when we dropped Blackie.