Yngwie

Did anyone see Duncan and Munro having a few angry words in the 2nd half on Saturday? Not sure who started it.

He ought to come in for Bayne. But he may give it a few games in the dugout first to suss out the problems with the team.

I'm disappointed that we are ending up with Brewster. But at least in his first spell we were always very organised and hard to beat, and that's what we need to get back to before we can even contemplate winning with style.

Alternatively, the Pied Piper has led an angry mob of impressionable fans on a trip to Roswell.

At least you are honest!

It's incredible the number of people who think they know "what is really going on". They don't. It has always been the case in the business of football that whispers and tales emanate from sources who are not quite as reliable or informed as they claim to be, or insiders who have their own agenda or axe to grind.

It was rather embarassing when he lost out on a header to wee Gomis.

He certainly has class. The questionmarks over fitness, pace and workrate remain. He will continue to improve, but will he be better than Brewster?

Wilson was excellent when he came on today, he really got stuck in. Never seen him try so hard.

Which is perfectly fine.

I hope a few folk on here are feeling sheepish about slating the Board for not appointing someone who was never interested.

What you experienced was just NHS internal policy, very common in public sector. There are no such legal requirements.

Some will go anywhere for the sake of their career, other won't go more than 20 miles from home.

Come off it, we all know geographic remoteness is a factor for ICT. It's the reeason why we lost our best 2 captains ever, and why we have missed out on signing targets. But getting pack to the title of the thread, could the cynics please tell me when ourboard have ever let us down - from taking risks on Paterson, Robertson, brewster and Christie, to groundsharing at Pittodrie, getting the stands built, making a profit 3 years in a row..... Some people have very short memories, and I sometimes feel they would be better off supporting one of the Old Firm.

Clubs don't announce a new manager and say "Well, we didn't really want him, but ........" Our club also has a great record of conducting it's business in private and not through the media. Is it not unprofessional to announce publicly why you have rejected certain candidates? The board's discretion is being used as fuel by the grassy knoll brigade.

Yes, because discussions always start with an agent. Who knows, perhaps we enquired with the agent who told us Warnock wanted a ?250,000 salary, to bring in his own backroom team on ?100,000 each, a ?1m transfer kitty, and to only be in Inverness 2 days a week? I am disappointed we are going back to Brewster, but can't be doing with people who have chosen to crucify the board despite not knowing the facts.

If Warnock actually wanted the job, he would have applied for it, or made some kind of contact with the club?

He's been atrocious this season. Pity we don't have much in the way of cover though.

Most fans consider ICT to be bigger than any individual within it.

Warnock never actually applied for the job. The club did however proactively approach his agent, I believe.

I think Brewster will be more concerned with Rossco's very dubious form. Same goes for the rest of the defence.

I wasn't planning to travel up to the game, but now I am, just to spite SMEE. :sillywave:

I think Brewster has been there as a contingency plan throughout 2007 should Charlie need some time off. A vacancy has arisen, the club have looked at other applicants, but knowing that Brewster was an acceptable fallback position should nobody more suitable emerge. I do not doubt that the Board have made efforts, making approaches for Coyle, Lennon, and Warnock. However they were either not interested or non-starters due to financial demands or perceived lack of commitment. The Board simply want what's best for ICT, does anyone doubt that? Have they ever let us down on a big decision?

Perhaps, but I think the "silent majority" of ICT fans would agree with most of that post.

Our board have NEVER let us down on a big decision before. For that reason I will give them the benefit of the doubt.