Skip to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/28/2024 in all areas

  1. 4 points
    This is great news for the long term future and viability of the club. Alan Savage has done his bit so now it's time for the fans to do theirs. Be it via turning up on a Saturday, buying merchandise or anything else. Some of the things that we're hearing from Savage and on the grapevine just seem incredible. Some of the deals that the outgoing CEO committed to are quite incredible, no competent person would sign up to them unless there was a personal return or benefit via personal companies or capacities....... Messrs Morrison, Cameron and Munro should have a few questions to answer too. Namely the transfer of land around the stadium and how it came to be under their control when it was used as the basis for going concern in previous accounts. They obviously put substantial sums into the club however that was partly to cover their own incompetence. Certainly appears like some of these transactions were made to ensure they were kept right regardless of what happened. It also explains why they've been so quick to get a deal together, the true cost is less than it seems.
  2. 4 points
    Indeed. Yvonne Crook was a disaster of a CEO also.
  3. 4 points
    Well that was a surreal 20 minutes - first Alan Savage announces that we are only days away from administration on the BBC news, then at the end of the news there is an announcement that we have been saved from administration. Talk about a rollercoaster of emotions. All good though. Well done and thank you, Mr Savage.
  4. 3 points
    If ever there were any doubt about our former CEO ....
  5. 3 points
    All sounds very sensible. Alan Salvage™ still a breath of fresh air. The comment that "he would take Caley Thistle forward “on a realistic basis”, as a Championship level operation with aspirations to return to the Premiership." is EXACTLY what it should be. We can have aspirations to return to the Premiership, but first we should be a fiscally responsible championship club. If we reach the Premiership as we did before, then great, otherwise I will take boring fiscal responsibility over the cluster**** of emotions we have endured over the last few years.
  6. 3 points
    Inverness Courier article EXCLUSIVE: Alan Savage ready to go it alone as leading Caley Thistle investor - if £3 million debt deal is sealed... But Mr Savage sought to temper the expectations of supporters by warning that, if given stewardship, he would take Caley Thistle forward “on a realistic basis”, as a Championship level operation with aspirations to return to the Premiership. “The bottom line is I’m trying to put the club on an even keel. “I’ve got it under control, but it is never the done deal until the actual legal agreements are signed (with those owed loan amounts). “The bottom line is I’m trying to put the club on an even keel. “I’ve got it under control, but it is never the done deal until the actual legal agreements are signed (with those owed loan amounts). “Until I do, I’m not going to speak to any prospective buyer. “We don’t need to rush into that because I can run that football club, with local business support, and with my own cash. “Let me steady the ship and tell all the stakeholders what’s going on.” Mr Savage said there was an estimated £6-700,000 of club debt to tackle, but added: “I can cover that.” “I’m trying to go about this in a sensible and pragmatic way that reflects the football club, in balance with the city of Inverness. “Then we can go from a position of strength to say if you want to buy the football club, what are you going to do with it? How do you see it going?
  7. 2 points
    Geezo what a rollercoaster ride that was. Incredible turn around in 2 hours. Hopefully this gives the club time to rebuild for the future and we operate within our means. I hope the club sticks with the youth but sadly I think we will see them loaned out and forgotten about.
  8. 2 points
    Given that the latest set of figures presumably includes a significant windfall from the Celtic Cup Final, the scale of losses to then get us relegated is mind boggling. Reference to our friend Scot Gardiner convincing the auditors that the club was or is a going concern.....clearly his last positive act.
  9. 2 points
    The club can't sell it, it's not theirs to sell. We initiated a 99-year lease of the land when we built the stadium so likely 69-70 years left on the lease, but ultimately it is owned by the council who have rules and regulations about what can and cannot happen with it. I don't know the ins and outs, or the law, but I assume the lease could be transferred to someone else and this is what has been done to secure the loans given to the club by the directors who now "own" the lease. This is similar to what David Sutherland did. He (or Tulloch) built and "owned" the stands that were sitting on the leased land but gifted them back to the club later. I suspect that Tulloch had them on their balance sheet as fixed assets for a period of time and depreciated a percentage each year until they were basically worth nothing to them on paper. Hopefully the leaseholders can be persuaded to do something similar or take a reduced fee if they insist on getting some of their money back. One thing for sure, AS is doing something that should have been done years ago, and personally I like him telling it like it is, good or bad, and holding people accountable regardless of whether those people might get pissed off and sue him as he mentioned when talking about our former CEO.
  10. 2 points
    OOOfffffff Kudos to AS. Get them to sign over the loans and then screw them into the floor in order to compensate for their mismanagement of Gardiner. I have to take my hat off to AS ... he is conducting an absolute business recovery masterclass!
  11. 2 points
    Two 'ifs' one 'might' and one 'maybe' Conjecture you say...
  12. 1 point
    Maybe he can pay him with a couple of thousand over-ordered shirts 😉
  13. 1 point
    Interesting to compare the Courier’s coverage of this morning’s press conference with the club’ statement from Panos! Courier : The club needs, and deserves, certainty after five years of huge losses, chaos, confusion and (ex-CEO) Scot Gardiner.” ICTFC : The Club needs and deserve certainty after 5 years of huge losses, chaos and confusion. Courier : “If these entrepreneurs are prepared to deal with £150,000 of the loanees who want payment, I will deal with the £70,000 Scot Gardiner thinks he is owed.” ICTFC : Mr Savage said if these entrepreneurs deal with £150,000 of the loanees who want payment, then he will deal with the remaining £70,000.
  14. 1 point
    Indeed. Savage is blunt and straight talking which is refreshing after 7 years of being treated like mushrooms (or worse). I am sure he too has heard all the rumours doing the rounds about various things and will seek out the details of any that hold water, exposing any shady deals that may exist or have existed in the process.
  15. 1 point
    The forensic auditors reporting back on the losses
  16. 1 point
    From the club website just now: “Amicable deal has been struck that saves club from administration all stakeholders should be delighted” Alan Savage says it’s a great result and hopefully we get another one on Saturday. Interim Chairman Panos Thomas has also expressed his delighted and is hoping too for a good result on Saturday.
  17. 1 point
    As the previous chairman signed off on accounts that used car park income from the red john agreement as a reason for being a going concern then it seems a little suspect that he's now claiming ownership seperate from the club with no existing agreement that income also goes to the club. Feels very similar to the battery storage thing where the club went from being soul owner to just 1%. Seems the ceo wasn't the only one doing strange deals.
  18. 1 point
    Still have a major task to get things back on a better footing, but at least AS is leaving no stone unturned. Re the development potential of land around the stadium: "Mr Cameron and Mr Morrison now own the lease on a potentially lucrative seven acres of land surrounding the stadium." The final/ adopted version of the Inner Moray Firth Local Development Plan does allocate the land (including the car/coach parks) for a mix of uses but is heavily caveated with various requirements, which will be a significant cost to developers to address. This includes redevelopment of the site not resulting in a net decrease in parking provision (for the stadium), any compensatory parking provision being located in close proximity to the stadium, be easily accessible and have high quality active travel connections to the stadium. Not an easy task in its own right.
  19. 1 point
    As concerning as the article is, it is refreshing that AS is not sugar coating it, as well as calling out those he deems responsible (or should have been) during the tenure of our former CEO. Thank You. Talking of crowdfunding... just a reminder that our player sponsorship initiative is still open. We have secured enough to sponsor one player's main shirt and would like to get to a second (and more) if possible.
  20. 1 point
    I am slightly concerned that the agreement on the loans hasn't been legally signed off and hopeful that's what the above mentioned press conference is to confirm. Will Morrison want to give up his loans and the attached securities if there's a chance someone else is going to come in and profit from developing land around the stadium? Everything crossed.
  21. Yes, thanks Celtic1Caley3, for posting that link about Gardner's record at both Hearts and Dundee. We are well shot of him, and just in the nick of time. At least, many of us feel more comfortable about Savage being back at the helm, if only temporarily. Now we need to win a few matches and learn how to score goals again. Whether we can do that with Ferguson still here is doubtful, but I'm willing to be proved wrong. Onwards and upwards.
  22. 1 point
    I am simply highlighting a relatively cost effective manner in which Alan Savage could gain a majority stake, if that is what he is seeking.
  23. Superb article here on Scot Gardiner...https://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/24542638.inverness-struggles-scot-gardiner-come-no-surprise/
  24. 1 point
    Not to mention his disregard of the Hippocratic Oath, which he should have taken and been guided by throughout his career.
  25. 1 point
    I gave him a little longer, but it was still in 2019 so not long after he started. The club asked the fans for fundraising ideas or leads to people interested in investing. I made a speculative cast over this side of the pond and actually got a bite I didn't expect. I lined up things, got the contact info together, provided names and phone numbers to the chairman who said he would pass this to the CEO, and stepped back to let the business folks on either side do their thing. After COVID it emerged that no-one had contacted the executive on this side of the pond even for a simple conversation. It may have come to nothing, after that conversation, or it could have been the beginning of a beautiful relationship, but we will never know as it never took place. Why bother asking for ideas and leads if you are not going to follow up on them. I actually spoke to the executive after COVID and he expressed surprise at not getting a phone call. That was one of my first red flags. Another was comments reaching me about his management "style" from various people. These were both fans and (former) staff members. That kind of style is never effective in any business and more importantly not part of the ICT ethos. Absolutely. Some of the board members may think things will smooth over, and perhaps they will as ICT fans are, for the most part, pretty docile and understanding... BUT, they let this guy run the club, largely unchecked for 5 years and that demands accountability. Clearly no-one looked deeply into the books as AS discovered all sorts of issues within 24 hours, or if they did they chose to let it slide which is incompetence of the highest order, or even bordering on criminal. There is also the unforgiveable nature of how club legends have been treated over the last few years, not just this summer and that is not (entirely) down to the former CEO. You can look at Shane Sutherland as a pre-cursor to the same treatment handed out to Aaron. You read Aaron's own comments about a man who is reputedly a renowned surgeon, you look at the players who should have had testimonials and have not, you look at the fact that after relegation in May not one of these people took the bull by the horns and actually talked to players about their futures. FFS we have a club that got relegated and facing financial turmoil and you cant have the decency to discuss that with loyal employees? We can lay the blame for part of this at Duncan Ferguson who should not have f***ed off on holidays leaving players standing on the side saying "WTF?" but the board are also culpable in a large way. They are happy to receive the plaudits when things go right and sitting in the posh chairs at Hampden, equally they should be strong enough to take fierce criticism over this cluster*** It is their job to block this if they see red flags, not to embrace it and then try to justify it over a period of weeks where media and fans perform the due diligence and find out in 5 minutes why this is the worst idea in the world. Because there has been zero governance over the last 5 years (in fact, since around 2017).
  26. 1 point
    Especially good old Panos. The ‘renown’ orthopaedic sports and knee surgeon specialist that told Aaron Doran to ‘beat-it’ as the club reneged on a promise to honour delayed surgery to his knee. It says everything you need to know about this persons integrity and moral ethics going forward. Just the kind of guy that you can trust to look after the clubs future interest. Insert ‘his own’ in the last sentence where appropriate! He may be part of the ‘deals’ to accept as the club finances are re-set and I’ll accept that. But as one of the many fans that donated to let Aaron have the required surgery, P Thomas will always be a stain on the club in my opinion.
  27. 1 point
    I’m pretty sure the Board and even SG had concerns about Makwana, they aren’t actually stupid and I’m sure they all know how to use Google as much as the rest of us and would have seen the same red flags. The trouble is, what other options did they have at the time? It seems that at the time Seventy7 was either the most credible option on the table or the only show in town. If the choice was to pursue it or to go bust when the money ran out this month, they had a statutory duty to pursue it and hope that it came good. And who knows, maybe it would have done - latest Wyness Shuffle mentions a source outwith the club who suggested that Makanwa did actually have access to resources and was serious, but I still have my doubts. Bear in mind that our major shareholders and wealthy local businessmen, as well as the wider football investment community, all knew since May that we were on the very brink of administration, and every single one of them declined to step in and save the club. The club was in a desperate situation and the Board must have felt in a ‘beggars can’t be choosers’ situation in the absence of any offers better than Makanwa’s. The real issue is how we came to be in such a weak and desperate position in the first place.
  28. 1 point
    It's not just Gardiner. It cannot be repeated often enough that, if they intend to stay on, them the Board has very serious questions to answer about how they let Gardiner run the club as his private fiefdom, and especially also how they were taken in by Makwana. These questions cannot be ignored. The ideal place to ask them would be at the overdue AGM - or at an EGM if one is required if there is a takeover. This would be a chance for the Board to explain themselves and clear the air, or say "mea culpa" and stand down. Until that happens, the stink of incompetence will remain.
  29. 1 point
    The P & J piece is interesting but it's not much of a surprise really. A lot of that stuff was uncovered by fans within a couple of hours of this LinkedIn clown appearing from nowhere. Still, it shows what a shambles Gardiner has made of things that he was wowed by such an obvious fraud. Speaks volumes of his tenure at the club and, as mentioned in another post, leaves what's left of his reputation in ruins.
  30. 1 point
    I was questioning his position after 12 months of him in post. There really wasn't a business model for him being there, and along with his shocking track record, and reputation as a bit of a tyrant, I really wasn't surprised at the mess he has left. He was desperately trying to stay on even after resigning because he knew he was going to get found out. His career is in tatters now, his reputation in the gutter, and rightly so.
  31. 1 point
    A lucky escape! To read that Gardiner thought it to be an 'incredibly strong and positive proposal' just confirms his incompetence! How he was allowed to carry on running the club for 5 years is absolutely staggering! It is such a relief to see the back of him!
This leaderboard is set to London/GMT+01:00

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. : Terms of Use : Guidelines : Privacy Policy

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.