https://ictfc.com/club-statement-17/

Hers's a statement by the chairman on the recommendation to refuse the planning application.  It includes a link to a video he has made with a message to the Councillors.  Clearly whether it goes ahead or not will have a significant bearing on the viability of the club.

8 hours ago, DoofersDad said:

I assume our Chairman has been quoted correctly in his letter to sponsors, otherwise the club would probably have issued a correction of some form.  What I find really disappointing is that he again makes the argument that permission should be given because the club is making such a positive use use of green space elsewhere in the City.  He was rightly criticised on this point by several Councillors at the planning meeting and yet he keeps banging on about it.  He just doesn't seem to understand the basic fact that those making the decision on a planning application need to be seen to base their decision on matters pertaining directly to the application.  Getting in a public huff about the fact that elected Councillors and Council Officials have not allowed other matters to be a factor in the decision, only further sours the relationship between Club and Council.  It is, frankly, naive and embarrassing.  The relevant and much stronger "green space" argument is that the proposal contains a commitment to plant a variety of trees and shrubs on the site which will increase both the biodiversity and the carbon capture potential of the site.

I'm afraid I don't have a lot of confidence that the decision will be reversed.  I also think it would be prudent to plan on the basis that it won't go through.  If I was a sponsor I would not be paying my sponsorship early, I would want to be holding back and seeing what the promised financial restructuring involved.

 

This is the wording of the Chairman’s letter to sponsors, with contact details removed:

I am writing to you today, firstly to thank you for your backing of our football club, and secondly to appeal to you to kindly continue that support. 

As I am sure you are aware, we have recently and very disappointingly, had planning refused by Highland Council for the installation of a 4 acre battery energy storage farm on the site of the former Fairways Golf Course, the reason given was due to loss of green space in a private green space area of 200 acres.  This is despite the fact that one of our many important and impactful Caley Thistle community projects involves the complete resurrection of a significantly larger green space adjacent to Inverness Royal Academy, which is a ten acre site that will be used as a community hub for the city and beyond, promoting physical and mental health wellbeing for thousands of people both young and old in the Highlands.

Our quest to seek planning permission for the battery farm has now been escalated to Scottish Government level and it is our strong expectation that the Highland Council’s decision will be overturned on appeal but this will take a number of months.

What this means is that we face significant pressure on our cash flow.

To that end, I am writing to all our sponsors to ask if you would be able to help us through this situation by renewing your advertising with us slightly earlier than normal.  If you are able to renew by return, it would be hugely appreciated by everyone at ICTFC and will not only help the club continue in our current form, but it will also allow us to continue the great work we do in the city and beyond, especially as we enter our 30th anniversary. 

If you can help us, we would be able to thank you for that support by offering a 15% discount on last season’s price for an early renewal.

If you can help, please contact our Commercial Director Keith Haggart, either on his email address of ——- or by mobile ——-. 

Finally, as ever, on behalf of myself, the Board of Directors and Executive team, it is a privilege to serve our football club and we thank you for being a part of the club which has represented the city so well in the last 30 years.

The 'help the club continue in its current form' is the most worrying part of that letter.

On 4/24/2024 at 5:30 PM, STFU said:

The 'help the club continue in its current form' is the most worrying part of that letter.

That’s a very fair comment.

It highlights why getting involved with the Supporters Trust is important for everyone who cares about the club.

The Trust has made it clear that it won’t invest in shares without commitments from the club, and the commitments sought will have to reflect the views of its members.

I know some are sceptical but, I’m my opinion, the recent growth in membership if the Trust and the resulting influence it can bring to bear can only be positive. 

Plans for a battery storage facility at Essich.  Blows a bit of a hole in the argument that Fairways was the only site available locally where they could get access to the grid.

It was at Fairways because that’s where the club were offered land for little or no cost, as well as it having access to the grid.

3 hours ago, STFU said:

Plans for a battery storage facility at Essich.  Blows a bit of a hole in the argument that Fairways was the only site available locally where they could get access to the grid.

I don't think they ever suggested it was the only place in existence with a connection to the grid. Just the only one that ICT could make use of. 

Interesting to hear the HC response to the one in Essich as it is 4 times the size of the Fairways one. I expect that the loss of green space in this case will be unconscionable. 

41 minutes ago, Fraz said:

I don't think they ever suggested it was the only place in existence with a connection to the grid. Just the only one that ICT could make use of. 

Interesting to hear the HC response to the one in Essich as it is 4 times the size of the Fairways one. I expect that the loss of green space in this case will be unconscionable. 

Good arable farmland might not be as important than green space for walking dogs or sledging 

Richest club in League One allez allez

Appeal finally submitted. 

The main, probably only reason for Herr Gardiner to stay 

But why did they wait until the 11th hour?

Perhaps to make sure they got the appeal correct?.  Doesn't alter the timescale fir hearing any appeal as assume the planning authorities would have to wait until the timescale for appeals had lapsed.

https://www.dpea.scotland.gov.uk/CaseDetails.aspx?ID=125202

 **Case Update – 05/07/2024** The case has been placed on hold pending receipt of missing documents and clarification of others

 

 

3 hours ago, Scotty said:

 **Case Update – 05/07/2024** The case has been placed on hold pending receipt of missing documents and clarification of others

 

 

Can they not get anything right? 

1 hour ago, old caley girl said:

Can they not get anything right? 

That's why we are in such a mess the people that are running our club are useless 

In a few years time this will be a comedy series on BBC I player. Who could take on the part of Scott Gardiner.

I'm sure it's all just part of the plan like the delaying of the accounts.  They just need time to have auditors look over the missing documents.

2 minutes ago, IMMORTAL HOWDEN ENDER said:

In a few years time this will be a comedy series on BBC I player. Who could take on the part of Scott Gardiner.

Ricky Gervais is the only person on the planet who could pull that off.

Does anyone know that if the appeal is upheld, ICT will benefit? 
 

I’ve read the appeal document, it seems like the applicants (?) have very good grounds here. I just can’t work out if ICT will benefit as a result. 

Yet it looks like the Planning consultant employed by the club made a lot of errors with the submitted and missing documents. The difference between the name of the applicant and appellant for starters. Other Planning consultants were available but never asked.😷

Nicola Drummond, Planning Consultant,

9 hours ago, Northern_jaggie said:

Does anyone know that if the appeal is upheld, ICT will benefit? 
 

I’ve read the appeal document, it seems like the applicants (?) have very good grounds here. I just can’t work out if ICT will benefit as a result. 

used to be a Planning Manager at Highland Council.

When the Company was set up the football club was sole shareholder.

Initial Shareholdings Name: INVERNESS THISTLE AND CALEDONIAN F.C. LIMITED Address CALEDONIAN STADIUM STADIUM ROAD INVERNESS SCOTLAND IV1 1FF Class of Shares: ORDINARY Number of shares: 1 Currency: GBP Nominal value of each share: 1 Amount unpaid: 0 Amount paid: 1

However, as you can see from Companies House an update is over due.    https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/SC732789

There is a belief that Morrison may have bought a share in the Company for £250,000. However, as things stand it looks like David Cameron may have control over the Company unless it has been restructured to allow a non ICT Director to be on it i.e. Morrison. Behind the scenes this looks as though it confused Nicola as to the applicant. 

ICT only owns 1% of the battery farm company, so on the face of it it’s not really our problem (or asset) any more. Morrison/Munro/Cameron purchased 33% each for a total of £250,000 and will be the ones who gain if the project proceeds. 
 

 

1 hour ago, Yngwie said:

ICT only owns 1% of the battery farm company, so on the face of it it’s not really our problem (or asset) any more. Morrison/Munro/Cameron purchased 33% each for a total of £250,000 and will be the ones who gain if the project proceeds. 
 

 

Protected asset in case of administration?

3 hours ago, Yngwie said:

ICT only owns 1% of the battery farm company, so on the face of it it’s not really our problem (or asset) any more. Morrison/Munro/Cameron purchased 33% each for a total of £250,000 and will be the ones who gain if the project proceeds. 
 

 

 

1 hour ago, Satan said:

Protected asset in case of administration?

Ross Morrison holds a charge over the club's share in the battery farm so there was no need to 'protect' it at the battery company level if that was the purpose.

Sadly it all feels way more like directors protecting their own interests.

It also further complicates negotiations on any investment deal thet are trying to do.